Already a Bloomberg.com user?
Sign in with the same account.
It's unclear whether a new U.S. President would lift the 45-year trade embargo, but public opinion favors improved relations between the countries
For 45 years, Fidel Castro had a convenient scapegoat for many of the island's problems: a U.S. trade embargo that since 1962 has barred American companies and individuals from investing in or trading with Cuba.
Ask Cubans why their lives are so difficult and why store shelves are so bare, and they'll respond without hesitation what has been drummed into them by schoolteachers, local news commentators, and Fidel's speeches over the years: "It's because of the U.S. blockade."
A Tale of Many Restrictions
The Cuban government has always referred to the embargo as a "blockade," a word that has a more sinister tone than "embargo" and makes it sound as if the U.S. Navy has encircled the island to keep ships packed with goods from reaching Cuba's 11.4 million people. In fact, it's the harsh penalties for individuals and companies that do business with Cuba without special permission from the U.S. Treasury that have made the embargo effective for four decades.
Washington imposed the embargo in retaliation for Cuba's expropriation of U.S. business interests. Over the years the embargo grew in scope as American politicians and the anti-Castro Cuban American community in Miami grew frustrated by Havana's ability to withstand the economic sanctions. In 1992 the U.S. Congress approved the Cuban Democracy Act, restricting Americans from visiting the island, banning family remittances, and prohibiting foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies from doing business with Cuba. And in 1996, Congress approved the Helms-Burton Act, which allows Washington to ban entry into the U.S. of executives and major shareholders of foreign companies that do business in Cuba.
But will a new U.S. President lift the trade embargo with Cuba? When Raúl Castro was chosen as Cuba's new President on Feb. 24, Washington dismissed him as "Fidel Lite" and said he did not represent change. U.S. law stipulates that Washington may not recognize a transitional government in Cuba if it includes Fidel or Raúl Castro in the leadership ranks. So, even if the new occupant of the White House were to favor lifting the embargo, it could not be done without changing the law.
Diplomacy, with Conditions
Of the three leading Presidential candidates, only Democratic contender Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has said he would be willing to sit down and talk with Raúl Castro's government, as long as human rights are on the agenda. Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) has said she wouldn't do so until Havana starts implementing economic and political reforms, while Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) has said talks are off until Cuba begins a "transition to a free and open society" and releases all political prisoners.
For years, American politicians have been wary of crossing the powerful Cuban American lobby, especially in Florida, a key state for any national election. But polls show that sentiment among Cuban émigrés has moderated over the years, as the aging ranks of people who fled Castro's Communist rule in the early 1960s have thinned. More recent arrivals, who fled in the 1980s and 1990s because of economic hardship, favor greater people-to-people contacts and believe it makes sense to engage the Cuban leadership in talks aimed at improving life for relatives left behind.
A Gallup survey released on Feb. 27 showed that while 83% of Americans view Fidel Castro negatively, 61% favor establishing diplomatic relations with Cuba.
Representative Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the powerful House Ways & Means Committee, on Jan. 24 introduced a measure that would end the ban on travel by Americans to Cuba. Until 2004, Cuban Americans were allowed to travel only once a year to visit family in Cuba. That year, the Bush Administration cut back such visits to once every three years. New restrictions were also placed on money remittances and academic and scientific exchanges. Democrats in Congress have vowed to eliminate the restrictions imposed in 2004, in the belief that greater people-to-people contact will hasten the move toward democracy in Cuba.
A Willingness to Barter, on Both Sides
U.S. business also is lobbying for a lifting of the embargo, saying American companies could easily sell $1 billion in goods to Cuba a year, from the outset. Last year, U.S. firms sold $438 million worth of chicken, rice, wheat, corn, and other agricultural goods, as well as some forestry products—such as newsprint and thousands of wooden utility poles—to Cuba under special permits first granted in 2000 for humanitarian reasons. Even though Cuba must pay cash up front for such transactions because financing the Cuban government is not allowed under the embargo, U.S. sales of such products to Cuba have tallied $2 billion, according to the U.S.-Cuba Trade & Economic Council.
Cubans have been closely following the U.S. Presidential elections. They eagerly approach the few Americans who visit the island—under journalist visas, academic exchanges, or as tourists defying the embargo—to ask whether they think the winner will lift the decades-old blockade. William, 28, a waiter who earns around $25 a month at a government-owned hotel, says he would like to see his father and three brothers in the U.S. more than once every three years. Like many Cubans, he didn't want to reveal his last name for fear of losing his job. "What's the point in keeping the blockade in place?" he asks. "It hurts the average Cuban more than it hurts the government. We just want access to consumer goods that everyone else in the world can buy. And it's inhumane to keep us from seeing our families."
Raú:l Castro has said on three occasions over the past 18 months that he would like to talk with the next U.S. Administration to discuss ways of improving relations. "Cuba is ready and willing to sit down at any table with the U.S. government to discuss every difference we have, without preconditions," says Josefina Vidal, the Cuban Foreign Ministry's director of North American affairs. Havana used to insist that it would not talk until the embargo was lifted or until the Americans gave up their military base at Guantánamo Bay.
Our Least-Favored Communists
In recent years, Vidal says, Havana has noted an evolution of public opinion in the U.S. "We have to wait and see if the next Administration will be willing to try a different policy toward Cuba," she says. "Unprecedented sanctions have been applied to collapse the Cuban government for decades now, with no results."
Washington has managed to do business with other Communist regimes: The U.S. normalized relations with China in 1979 and lifted the trade embargo on Vietnam in 1992. While relaxation of the 2004 travel and remittance restrictions on Cuba may well be possible under a new Administration, mending relations with the world's smallest Communist country may continue to be a much tougher proposition.