? Dunn's Done, Hurd's Not |
| Check Out Your Choices for Best of the Web ?
September 22, 2006
Growing Concerns over Click Fraud
My colleagues Brian Grow and Ben Elgin take a fascinating dive into click fraud, concluding:
A BusinessWeek investigation has revealed a thriving click-fraud underground populated by swarms of small-time players, making detection difficult. "Paid to read" rings with hundreds or thousands of members each, all of them pressing PC mice over and over in living rooms and dens around the world. In some cases, "clickbot" software generates page hits automatically and anonymously. Participants from Kentucky to China speak of making from $25 to several thousand dollars a month apiece, cash they wouldn't receive if Google and Yahoo were as successful at blocking fraud as they claim.
Google, Search, Yahoo
TrackBack URL for this entry:
For your information, there is a U.S patent pending (serial number: 360688) on a technology that explain clearly how to prevent most fraudulent clicks. Search engines are benefiting greatly of click fraud. But search engines may also be infringing on that patented method. In 2002, well before click fraud became widely reported and was a concern for Google and others, before click fraud was an issue among search engines, a serial seasoned inventor, French born Patrick Zuili and his partner thought about the problem and filed this patent in February 2003. Anyone that will be selling software or any search engines trying to prevent click fraud will likely be one way or another infringing in Zuili’s patent. Patent2 watch:
Posted by: hugo at September 23, 2006 09:02 AM
I don't know about that patent, it sounds pretty illegitimate. For now, people should just use a click fraud detection service like the one I use at www.clickprotector.com they aren't even expensive.
Posted by: Al Trammell at September 28, 2006 12:39 AM