Corporate America's Crunched Numbers


What do big companies really earn? Between the bear market and

prosecutions of CEOs for accounting fraud, investors badly want to know.

But they might not like one of the latest answers: less than half what

Wall Street says and about a third less than companies themselves report

under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

That's the outcome of a yearlong search to identify "core earnings"

by Standard & Poor's, like BusinessWeek a unit of The McGraw-Hill

Companies. The main reasons for the huge differences? Rigorous

accounting for stock options and pensions. Those two factors weigh

heavily enough in the core-earnings calculations to slice more than $5

and $6, respectively, off the roughly $27 per share that companies in

the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index reported as net earnings for the

12 months that ended in June. Wall Street's rose-colored numbers,

collated by Thomson First Call, put average earnings per share at around

$45 (see table below).

Naturally, not everyone is happy with S&P's downbeat numbers or the

way that they're calculated. Even before S&P published its findings on

Oct. 24, some accounting experts said its methods were inconsistent. All

the same, the numbers give investors a first glimpse of what truly clean

accounting might look like.

OVERHAUL AHEAD? For starters, the current valuations of stocks look awful. Shrinking the earnings companies report under GAAP by 31%, as S&P's core numbers do, catapults the average price-earnings multiple for the S&P 500 from a recent 33 to 48, a level likely to make stocks unattractive to many. Plus, the earnings yield on stocks falls to just 2%, or about half the yield of 10-year Treasuries.

S&P's conclusions foreshadow the possible results of an accounting

overhaul. More than 110 companies have announced since May that they

will begin expensing stock options. Already, the Financial Accounting

Standards Board, keeper of GAAP, is mulling whether to make companies

estimate options costs quarterly. Interest is also gathering for

overhauling accounting for pensions. On Oct. 21, FASB said it is looking

to refashion its code so that companies won't be able to find as many

loopholes as they do now.

But FASB's overhaul may take years. In the meantime, Wall Street

investment houses and research companies like S&P aren't waiting. David

M. Blitzer, an S&P managing director, says GAAP hides from investors the

true risk and cost to companies of their pension plans. That's becoming

crystal clear as more companies 'fess up that they need to pump cash

into the plans to make up for stock market losses.

Even if core earnings do not become a standard, Standard & Poor's

results may add fuel to the drive for accounting reform. The new numbers

underscore just how important it has become for regulators to hurry up

and set the books straight.

Two .pdf files (which require Adobe's Acrobat Reader) are available from Standard & Poor's: A Technical Bulletin that explains how S&P arrives at its core earnings number and how the current definition has been revised from the original issued in May, 2002; and a Market Review that explains in detail the results of the latest core-earnings study.

Also, BusinessWeek Online has prepared an Interactive Scoreboard showing 12-month trailing earnings as of June, 2002, for all the companies in the S&P 500. It shows both reporterd earnings and S&P core earnings for each of the S&P 500.

By David Henry in New York


Silicon Valley State of Mind
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

 
blog comments powered by Disqus