Businessweek Archives

Patient's Bill Of Rights: Business Gets Out The Scalpel


Washington Outlook

PATIENT'S BILL OF RIGHTS: BUSINESS GETS OUT THE SCALPEL

When Corporate America launched a massive lobbying blitz to block sweeping regulation of managed-care plans in late January, it looked like a loser. HMOs and other employer health plans were on the run as consumers, doctors, and pols cast them as the villains in a new world of bare-bones medicine. The public mood was clear down at the cineplex as audiences cheered Helen Hunt's character in As Good As It Gets when she blasted an HMO doctor for limiting her child's treatment.

But in a few short weeks, corporate forces have staged a remarkable comeback. Through skillful politicking, business has stalled the rush to impose new rules on health care. While Congress is still likely to enact a patient's bill of rights this year, the final package will be much more to employers' liking.

That's no mean feat. President Clinton's version of the patient's bill of rights gets plenty of applause for its call for easier access to specialists and treatments. And a physician-friendly Republican alternative that's even tougher on HMOs has 216 House sponsors.

"INTIMIDATED." To stem the tide, business lobbyists argue that the GOP bill, the Patient Access to Responsible Care Act (PARCA), would undermine the managed-care networks that have halted the double-digit medical inflation of the 1980s. PARCA's backers--a coalition of medical and consumer groups--maintain that the measure would raise costs by no more than 2.6%. But actuaries Milliman & Robertson Inc. conclude that the bill would hike premiums by 23%. A boost that large would induce 46% of small companies to drop health insurance, according to a poll released on Feb. 24 by the business-backed Health Benefits Coalition.

Those figures may be self-serving, but companies are using them to chip away at PARCA's support. They've teamed up with Senate GOP Whip Don Nickles (R-Okla.) and House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Tex.), who were furious that Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato (R-N.Y.) and 90 Republican House members--all up for reelection this fall--backed the measure. Now, two GOP co-sponsors have dropped out, and "many, many others have told us privately that they wish they hadn't signed on," says small-business lobbyist Dan Danner. Business, laments a Senate Democratic staffer, "has intimidated" Republicans sympathetic to HMO reform.

Corporate America still faces a formidable foe: Bill Clinton. His bill of rights would require health plans to give members detailed information about physicians, hospitals, and claims processing. It would mandate external appeal boards when health plans deny coverage. The package also would make it easier for patients to see specialists and to win payment for emergency-room visits even when they're false alarms. On Feb. 20, Clinton ordered that his rules apply to health plans covering 87 million federal employees, veterans, and Medicare and Medicaid recipients.

But business won't willingly follow suit. It sees the bill of rights as part of a Clinton plan to win what he couldn't get in 1994--sweeping health-care reform--one step at a time. The Business Roundtable wants a purchasers' coalition of large employers--excluding insurance, HMOs, and drug companies--to draft patient-protection rules that companies would pledge to meet voluntarily.

That won't satisfy politicians eager to ride the tide of HMO resentment. The Dems plan to make patient rights a centerpiece of their fall campaigns. And a GOP strategist concedes that such legislation "is a political imperative." With both parties aboard, some version seems bound to pass. Business may have defused the anti-HMO explosion--but it won't escape unscathed.EDITED BY OWEN ULLMANN By Mike McNamee, with Richard S. DunhamReturn to top

THE PAXON SHOCKER

Seven months after surviving a coup attempt, Speaker Newt Gingrich is rapidly consolidating his once-shaky hold on the House. Latest good news for Newt: the surprise retirement of Representative Bill Paxon (R-N.Y.) on Feb. 25.

His departure will remove the No.1 threat to Gingrich's leadership. Paxon had been working to topple Newt's top lieutenant, House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Tex.). Paxon, who lost his leadership post after meeting with the coup plotters, says he wants to spend more time with wife, Susan Molinari, and family. Molinari left the House last year to become a news anchor. "The priority of family must now take precedence," said Paxon. "I will never run for office again, never, not even for dog warden." Another reason: Armey--with Newt's help--is likely to keep his post after the elections.

Gingrich can now focus on plotting '98 House races and his 2000 Presidential bid. "With Paxon off the horizon, there's no immediate threat," notes congressional analyst Charles Cook.

Except from his own image: Gingrich remains hugely unpopular, though focusing on issues such as better schools has helped. And, says Republican pollster Whit Ayres, "He has been very smart to keep his mouth shut on the Clinton scandals."

Inside the House GOP, Newt is stronger than at anytime since the 1995-96 government shutdowns, though conservative dissidents vow to keep up pressure. Says one GOP strategist: "Newt doesn't have to watch his back at every turn--just at every other turn."By Richard S. Dunham EDITED BY OWEN ULLMANNReturn to top


Toyota's Hydrogen Man
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW
 
blog comments powered by Disqus