Bloomberg News

West Virginia Spill Prompts Drive for Tougher Regulations

January 14, 2014

West Virginia Spill Sparks Drive for Tougher Chemical Rules

An emergency crew tries to position booms to contain the chemical leak in the Elk River on Jan. 11, 2014 at the West Virginia American Water Company in Charleston. Photographer: Ty Wright/The Washington Post via Getty Images

A chemical spill that left 300,000 people in West Virginia unable to drink their water is reviving calls for more stringent regulation of thousands of chemical storage sites in the U.S., especially those near water supplies.

The Freedom Industries Inc. complex in Charleston that leaked was subject to a patchwork of federal and state regulations that allowed hazardous materials to be stored less than two miles upstream from a treatment facility for drinking water.

“Our legislature is in session, so the legislature should take action,” said Senator Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat. “But if they don’t, then we have to get Congress all over it.”

Related:

  • West Virginia Company Finished Merger Days Before Spill
  • West Virginia Lifts Ban After Spill Fouled Drinking Water
  • Chemical Maker Sued Over Elk River Spill

Residents in nine West Virginia counties were ordered not to drink, cook or bathe with municipal water after about 7,500 gallons of a chemical used in coal processing leaked Jan. 9 from a tank near the Elk River, upstream of a treatment plant for the West Virginia division of American Water Works Co.

Officials began lifting the ban yesterday in zones starting with Charleston, the state capital, after testing found levels of the chemical 4-methylcyclohexane methanol falling below one part per million. Federal authorities “do not anticipate any health effects from these levels,” the company said in a statement. It recommended residents flush water pipes and appliances such as ice makers to purge any of the chemical.

Restorations Begin

An estimated 35,000 residents in Charleston had water restored as of early today, West Virginia American Water said.

“We’re getting back to normal, stage by stage,” Senator Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, said today on MSNBC. “I’d say by tomorrow everything should be back up and running.”

There are potentially tens of thousands of storage tanks in communities around the U.S. filled with chlorine, natural gas and other materials and states are primarily responsible for their safety, said Sheldon Krimsky, an environmental policy professor at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts.

Federal laws should require more rigorous testing of hazardous chemicals to ensure they don’t pose health risks, Krimsky said.

“They are riding blind by saying, ‘OK, if we can get it down to one part per million that should be safe enough,’” Krimsky said in a phone interview. “They don’t really know.”

Oversight Gaps

House Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee yesterday asked Republicans to hold a hearing “to examine the regulatory gaps that this incident has exposed in the nation’s toxic chemical control laws.”

Representatives Henry Waxman of California and Paul Tonko of New York said there should be a review of why the law allowed the chemical, known as MCHM, involved in the West Virginia spill to go untested for almost 40 years.

“We should not have to wait for a major contamination event to learn the most basic information about a toxic chemical in commerce,” Waxman and Tonko wrote Representative John Shimkus, an Illinois Republican and chairman of the subcommittee.

The House energy committee is “actively monitoring the federal investigation and working to fully obtain the facts surrounding situation,” Charlotte Baker, a Republican spokeswoman, said in response to the Democrats’ letter.

Chemistry Council

House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican whose district is north of Cincinnati, said instead of more action from Congress, someone should be held accountable.

“We have enough regulations on the books, and what this administration ought to be doing is doing their jobs,” he said.

The American Chemistry Council, a Washington-based lobbying group whose members include Eastman Chemical Co. (EMN:US) and Dow Chemical Co. (DOW:US), said federal, state and local agencies should improve their coordination to ensure current laws are enforced.

“Essentially we think a good place to start would be to see if the current regulations are being followed or being implemented properly,” said Scott Jensen, a spokesman, in an e-mail. “And if not, we should focus on finding ways to improve implementation, which we think could probably be done through better coordination and communication.”

Federal authorities, including the U.S. Chemical Safety Board and the Justice Department, opened probes into the spill.

U.S. Probe

“If our investigation reveals that federal criminal laws were violated, we will move rapidly to hold the wrongdoers accountable,” Booth Goodwin, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia, said yesterday in a statement. “Our drinking water is not something you can take chances with, and this mess can never be allowed to happen again.”

The Greater Cincinnati Water Works, which serves 1.1 million people, plans to close its intakes from the Ohio River - - which is fed by the Kanawha and Elk rivers -- tonight until the spill passes, according to officials. The plant will use its two-day supply of treated water and a groundwater treatment facility as needed, the officials said.

Louisville Water Co., which is further downstream from Cincinnati, said its filtration system can handle the traces of the chemical that are expected in that area later this week, and that carbon can be used to remove the licorice smell.

Pollution Threats

While federal laws like the Safe Water Drinking Act require utilities to assess potential upstream pollution threats, it gives them little power to force fixes to minimize the risk, said Erik Olson, an attorney who specializes in water and health issues at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

He said the split in regulatory responsibilities can leave loopholes that accidents like the spill in West Virginia expose. “There is virtually no accountability here,” Olson said in a phone interview.

More information is needed about the risks of chemicals on the market and regulators need more authority to take action, such as ordering storage tanks be placed away from water sources, said Andy Igrejas, director of Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, a Washington coalition of health and safety groups pushing for tighter rules.

“This kind of disaster really does show you what all these things really mean,” Igrejas said in a telephone interview. “We don’t know enough, and we don’t know it quickly enough, about a chemical that could cause the drinking water for 300,000 people to be taken offline.”

State Reviews

Rockefeller had said the last time the plant was inspected was in 1991, though a review of records shows the state’s Department of Environmental Protection checked the facility in 1999 and 2002 because it stored petroleum products, spokesman Tom Aluise said by phone.

The department’s division of air quality also visited the plant in April 2010 in response to a complaint by a resident nearby about a licorice odor that “leaves a bad taste in your mouth,” according to a report provided by the state. No violation was found, and the state also checked in 2012 whether an air permit was needed, Aluise said.

West Virginia doesn’t require inspection of storage tanks with chemicals such as the one that leaked, and there should be such regulations in place, said Larry Zuspan, who runs the local emergency planning committee in Charleston.

Zuspan said he didn’t know the storage tank was even there until the spill.

“For that magnitude of product that’s stored there, and where it was, it’s on a waterway, yeah, I think that’s going to require some inspections,” Zuspan, administrator of the Kanawha Putnam Emergency Planning Committee, said by phone.

State Inventory

The state is preparing an inventory of similar facilities in the state where there is no manufacturing or other activity that would require a permit, said Randy Huffman, secretary of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. Officials also will develop legislation for regulatory changes, including setbacks for facilities, he said.

“It gives you enough distance between the potential risk and the vulnerable asset to be able to go in and to respond with some kind of remediation or some kind of emergency response,” Huffman told reporters yesterday in Charleston.

Along the Kanawha River, about 14 miles downstream from the spill site, residents of the town of Nitro are beginning to come to grips with what the chemicals sitting next door mean to their safety.

Water Bottles

Closely held Freedom Industries initially trucked the chemicals from its tanks to those at a second facility it owns in Nitro, called Poca Blending. At the ramshackle grounds of Poca yesterday, where abandoned old Saabs sat fenced in at the end of a gravel drive, the sickly sweet smell of 4-methylcyclohexane methanol hung in the air.

As tanker trucks were hooked up to loading hoses, the members of the fire department of Nitro were busy up the road handing out federally shipped cases of water bottles. Jeff Elkins, Nitro’s fire chief, said he hadn’t paid much attention to what was being stored at the facility near the river -- until now.

Once the water emergency ends, “we’re going to look into it to see what they’ve got there,” Elkins said in an interview. “I’d like to know” if 4-methylcyclohexane methanol is still being stored there, he said.

To be sure, forcing chemical plants or storage facilities to move away from rivers would be no easy task. Along the Kanahwa River are chemical plants of Praxair Inc. (PX:US) and Bayer AG (BAYN) that dwarf the size and complexity of the Freedom Industries’ facility.

Aging Plant

And it isn’t just location that matters. The Freedom Industries plant in Charleston was so old that its owners were looking to shut it down before the spill, according to state officials. The Poca Blending plant in Nitro is only a decade old. “We’ve never had any trouble at Poca,” Elkins said.

The two lessons from the West Virginia spill are to be more vigilant about ensuring the structural integrity of tanks holding hazardous chemicals near bodies of water and to focus more resources on detection and monitoring, said James Salzman, a professor of law and environmental policy at Duke University.

The spill exposes a weakness in the nation’s system for guarding against contaminated water because while it’s impossible to pre-treat for every harmful chemical, there must be more emphasis on detecting unexpected contaminants, he said.

‘Soft Underbelly’

“When you get a large spill of chemicals that aren’t supposed to be there, that is a soft underbelly,” Salzman said in a telephone interview. “It’s a real challenge. In a world where public budgets are tight, you’ve got to make choices.”

The leak was detected by neighbors who smelled a licorice-like odor beginning at 8:15 a.m. on Jan. 9. State officials ordered the 14 above-ground storage tanks on the site emptied to prevent further spills.

The chemicals flowed through a hole of about an inch, Mike Dorsey, head of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection homeland security office, has said.

A message left with a plant spokeswoman seeking comment wasn’t returned.

Gary Southern, president of Freedom Industries, based in Charleston, apologized for the spill on Jan. 10 and said the company was working with state and federal officials.

To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Niquette in Columbus at mniquette@bloomberg.net; Jim Snyder in Washington at jsnyder24@bloomberg.net; Mark Drajem in Charleston, West Virginia at mdrajem@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at jmorgan97@bloomberg.net


Coke's Big Fat Problem
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

Companies Mentioned

  • EMN
    (Eastman Chemical Co)
    • $78.78 USD
    • -2.51
    • -3.19%
  • DOW
    (Dow Chemical Co/The)
    • $51.07 USD
    • -1.41
    • -2.76%
Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus