Bloomberg News

Tobacco Industry Spurned by U.S. High Court on Package Warnings

April 22, 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court turned away a tobacco industry challenge to a federal law that requires bigger, graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and imposes new marketing restrictions.

The justices today left intact a lower court ruling that said the 2009 measure didn’t violate the free-speech rights of tobacco companies. The cigarette makers challenging the law included Reynolds American Inc. (RAI:US)’s R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and a Lorillard Inc. (LO:US) subsidiary.

The law requires that half of the front and back panels of cigarette packages be devoted to warnings. The measure also instructed the Food and Drug Administration to develop color graphics that would become part of the warnings.

In addition, the law sets out rules governing the use of the words “light” and “low” in product descriptions and limits promotional practices including event sponsorships.

The appeal before the high court didn’t directly challenge the nine graphic images selected by the FDA to be placed on cigarette packages and advertisements. Those images included a man expelling cigarette smoke from a hole in his throat, diseased lungs and a cadaver.

A separate federal appeals court blocked the FDA’s proposed images, and the Obama administration chose to come up with a new approach rather than appeal to the Supreme Court.

The case acted on today is American Snuff v. United States, 12-521.

To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at skomarow1@bloomberg.net


Burger King's Young Buns
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

Companies Mentioned

  • RAI
    (Reynolds American Inc)
    • $56.86 USD
    • -0.43
    • -0.76%
  • LO
    (Lorillard Inc)
    • $60.73 USD
    • -0.10
    • -0.16%
Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus