Bloomberg News

Panetta Says Hagel Prepared for Defense Secretary Job

February 04, 2013

U.S. Defense Secretary Nominee Chuck Hagel

Chuck Hagel, nominee for U.S. secretary of defense, listens to a question during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in Washington, D.C. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Republicans grilling U.S. Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel last week focused too much on the past instead of addressing more pressing military issues, departing defense chief Leon Panetta said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“It’s pretty obvious the political knives were out for Chuck Hagel,” Panetta said in the interview, broadcast yesterday.

Hagel, a 66-year-old former Nebraska senator selected for the job by Democratic President Barack Obama, faced an onslaught of criticism from fellow Republicans during a Jan. 31 confirmation hearing. He answered questions about why he opposed the 2007 U.S. troop surge in Iraq and about his stances on nuclear arms reduction and Israel policy.

“What disappointed me is that they talked a lot about past quotes, but what about what a secretary of defense is confronting today?” Panetta said, pointing to current issues such as Afghanistan, terrorism, defense spending cuts, cyber attacks and turmoil in the Middle East. “All of the issues that confront a secretary of defense, frankly, we just did not see enough time spent on discussing those issues.”

Panetta, 74, said he is “absolutely” confident Hagel is prepared to take on the job.

General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declined to discuss whether he has confidence in a man “who could be my boss.” Hagel has “great credentials,” Dempsey said on the same NBC program. In a separate interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Dempsey said Hagel is “very thoughtful and very well prepared and very interested.”

Close Relationship

“If he’s confirmed, I’m sure that we’ll establish a very close working relationship,” Dempsey said on CNN.

Panetta, asked about military spending on NBC, said, “If Congress stands back and allows sequester to take place, I think it would really be a shameful and irresponsible act.”

“In a world of responsible politics, it should not happen,” he said.

Reduced funding for the military received renewed attention last week after a 22.2 percent drop in defense spending helped bring the growth of the nation’s gross domestic product to a minus 0.1 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter, the first contraction since the recession ended in 2009. The decline in defense purchases was the biggest since 1972, when military spending slumped in the closing years of the Vietnam War.

Civilian Employees

Automatic spending cuts that would reduce the defense budget by $45 billion this fiscal year will kick in on March 1 unless the Obama administration and Congress work to stop them. The Defense Department has said 800,000 civilian employees may have to be furloughed, losing two days per pay period.

“There’s this notion that that’s probably OK, because they’re just a bunch of white-collar bureaucrats,” yet 86 percent of those affected will be outside Washington, Dempsey said on NBC. “This will affect the entire country, and it will undermine our readiness for the next several years.”

Panetta said he couldn’t verify whether Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons.

“Every indication is they want to continue to increase their nuclear capability,” he said. “And that’s a concern. And that’s what we’re asking them to stop doing.”

Were Iran to pursue a nuclear weapon, Dempsey said on NBC, the U.S. military could “destroy their capability.”

Vice President Joe Biden said over the weekend that the U.S. is ready for direct talks about the contested nuclear program as soon as the Islamic Republic’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei makes a commitment to negotiate. U.S. and Iranian diplomats haven’t acknowledged bilateral meetings since October 2009, when they came together at a nuclear gathering in Geneva.

To contact the reporter on this story: Alexander Kowalski in New York at akowalski13@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ann Hughey at ahughey@bloomberg.net


The Good Business Issue
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW
 
blog comments powered by Disqus