Retirees with plump nest eggs are attractive targets for unscrupulous financial advisers who advise them to make unwise withdrawals. "The 'why work' pitch is epidemic," says Peter Moujay, a Pensacola (Fla.) attorney. Moujay has represented some 100 retirees of Marathon Refinery in rural Robinson, Ill., and a similar number of AT&T telephone workers out of Michigan, who were targets of such a scheme. Here's a chart outlining how long your money will last given certain withdrawal rates. In this hypothetical case, a 60-year-old retiree who made $80,000 a year and had an $800,000 retirement nest egg would be flat broke by now if he retired Jan. 1, 2000, and took 10% a year from an aggressive stock portfolio. Even assuming average returns and a diversified portfolio, a retiree taking 10% a year has little chance of having money left at age 85. (Assuming 3% increases in payouts each year to keep up with inflation.)
| Initial Withdrawal Rate | 4% | 8% | 10% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Withdrawal | $32,000 | $64,000 | $80,000 |
| Probability of Successful Retirement* (Money left at life expectancy) |
93% | 5% | 0% |
| Average Predicted Balance @ 85* (Diversified portfolio @ 7%) |
$1,539,693 | $39,403 | $1,499 |
| January 2000 Retirement, Actual Results** (Aggressive 100% stock portfolio) |
$424,081 | $91,149 | $0 |
| January 2000 Retirement, Actual Results** (Diversified 40% bond, 60% stock portfolio) |
$613,538 | $271,043 | $99,928 | * From Monte Carlo simulation based on 1,000 retirements utilizing random sequence of historical returns ** Actual performance of S&P 500, Lehman Agg. Bond Index less 1% management fee from Jan. 1, 2000, through Mar. 31, 2008 Data: Mark Congdon, The Horizon Group |
Der Hovanesian is Banking editor for BusinessWeek in New York .