Click Here to Go Directly to the Story




U.S. EDITION
Full Table of Contents
Cover Story
Up Front
Readers Report
Corrections & Clarifications
Books
Letter From Egypt
Technology & You
Economic Viewpoint
Economic Trends
Business Outlook

News: Analysis & Commentary
In Business This Week
Washington Outlook
International Business
International Outlook
People
Sports Business
Finance
The Corporation
Information Technology

Government
Science & Technology
Developments to Watch
The Barker Portfolio
Inside Wall Street
Figures of the Week
Editorials


INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS
International -- European Cover Story
International -- Readers Report
International -- Asian Business
International -- European Business
International -- Finance
International -- Int'l Figures of the Week
International -- Editorials




APRIL 22, 2002

Up Front
Edited by Sheridan Prasso


  STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story

On This Page
Talk Show

GM Brand Managers Get the Boot

To Get an MBA Is Glorious

Big Apple, Big Bonds--Big Pickle

Table: Will Jack Get Off Easy?

Northrop's Odd Take on Takeovers

Repaying the Loan Isn't Enough

Chart: Overwhelmed by Spam


Talk Show

"...the whole idea that we are independent from [the] banking [division] is a big lie" -- Merrill Lynch research analyst Kirsten Campbell, in an e-mail to a fellow analyst

Back to Top

CAR TALK
GM Brand Managers Get the Boot

"Brand management" is breathing its last at General Motors (GM ). In the '90s, now-departed GM North America boss Ron Zarrella hired a bunch of marketers from packaged-goods industries to boost GM's falling market share. Their task: Find a target group and tailor advertising and, occasionally, the cars to meet the group's desires. Often it resulted in such tricks as making a Pontiac Grand Prix and a Buick Regal--essentially the same car--with different styling.

Those days are over. Zarrella quit last fall, and Robert Lutz, who joined GM as vice-chairman for product development in September, is taking an ax to GM's so-called brand-management system. Over the past few months, GM has quietly sent a number of brand managers to new assignments or early retirement, thinning the ranks from 39 in 1996 to 26 now. More reductions may be coming, GM sources say.

And soon, those remaining will get a new title, possibly marketing director, the sources say. They'll no longer be part of Lutz's development team of engineers, designers, and division managers. Says one GM exec: "They never had much influence, and they'll have even less now." So much for the experiments of the '90s.

By David Welch


Back to Top

CHINA WATCH
To Get an MBA Is Glorious

As China prepares for the demands of the World Trade Organization, MBA and executive MBA programs are being launched across the country. There are 21 degree programs run jointly by Chinese and foreign universities, plus about 40 more by Chinese universities alone.

Execs at China's state-run and private companies, Chinese managers in foreign companies, and midlevel government officials--more than 4,000 people in all--have signed up in recent years. Up to 1,600 more are expected to enroll this year, paying tuitions from several thousand dollars to $40,000--often reimbursed by an employer--to study for nine months to two years. For the joint ventures, foreign institutions--including Harvard and Fordham universities and the European Union--provide much of the curriculum and faculty. Chinese universities supply the rest--and the operating license.

Now, more are opening: Washington University in St. Louis' Olin School of Business is launching one this month at Shanghai's prestigious Fudan University. The maximum 74 students are enrolled; more are on the wait list. "With the level of enthusiasm toward China and the investment being placed here by corporations from around the world, the timing is good," says Mark Wrighton, Wash U.'s chancellor. "Shanghai is a great place to be." Expect more foreign B-schools to share that sentiment soon.

By Dexter Roberts and Li Yan


Back to Top

HONCHOS
Big Apple, Big Bonds--Big Pickle

New York City mayor and billionaire mogul Michael Bloomberg has been in office for 100 days. But he's still presiding over a conflict of interest: his 80% stake in his financial-data and media company Bloomberg LP. (The mayor gave up CEO-ship when he took office.)

The conflict stems from the fact that his company's biggest clients are the same Wall Street firms that are currently vying to underwrite bond issues for New York City. Proposals were handed in on Apr. 8.

Usually, it's the mayor who picks the investment bank, along with the city comptroller. But now Bloomberg has quietly recused himself from the job. He'll let Budget Director Mark Page, along with the comptroller, do it instead, according to a mayoral spokesman.

If Merrill Lynch (MER ) is chosen as a city bond underwriter, there could be an even greater conflict of interest: Merrill is a 20% stakeholder in Bloomberg LP.

Meantime, the City Conflicts of Interest Board has yet to recommend how New York's businessman mayor should deal with his situation.

By Tom Lowry


Back to Top

THE LIST
Will Jack Get Off Easy?
Ex-General Electric (GE
) CEO Jack Welch--worth an estimated $680 million--no
doubt hopes his upcoming divorce won't be a drawn-out debacle like that
of colleague Gary Wendt. But even if wife Jane gets just a fraction of
his wealth, the settlement will qualify as major league.


COUPLE WHAT HE WAS WORTH* WHAT SHE GOT

CRAIG McCAW (Nextlink CEO) $2.0 At least $500 WENDY McCAW billion million in stock

DONALD TRUMP (Real estate mogul)** $1.75 $25 million, IVANA TRUMP billion including $14 million in cash

STEVEN SPIELBERG (Director) $200 $100 million AMY IRVING million

GARY WENDT (GE Capital) $100 $20 million, plus LORNA WENDT million $21,000 a month

* Approximate amounts, estimates ** Marla Maples, in a second divorce, got $2 million

Data: BusinessWeek, CNN.com, Forbes, Los Angeles Times


Back to Top

SLUGFESTS
Northrop's Odd Take on Takeovers

Northrop Grumman (NOC ), the Los Angeles defense contractor, is involved in a nasty battle to take over aerospace and auto-parts maker TRW (TRW ). And among Northrop's tactics is an assault on several unusual laws in Ohio--where TRW is based--designed to prevent hostile takeovers. In March, Northrop filed suit in federal court in Cleveland, calling the laws unconstitutional.

That's pretty ironic, says John Chevedden, a consultant and shareholder activist who has been trying for the past four years to get Northrop, maker of the B-2 stealth bomber, to drop its own antitakeover defenses. Antitakeover provisions, such as multiyear terms for board members and "poison pills" that allow existing shareholders to buy stock cheaply in the event of a hostile offer, were created in the 1980s as a way to thwart corporate raiders. In recent years, such protections have come under attack from shareholder activists, who say they are a detriment to stockholders. Studies have shown that companies without such protections have better stock market performance.

Chevedden has twice won a majority on proposals to eliminate Northrop's poison pill. But since the votes were nonbinding, Northrop hasn't complied. This year, it convinced the Securities & Exchange Commission that it didn't have to put Chevedden's poison bill proposal up for a vote again, in part because it exceeded a 500-word limit on resolutions. But Northrop shareholders will get to vote May 15 on another Chevedden proposal to wipe out a Northrop requirement that some shareholder initiatives receive 80% of the vote to pass.

Northrop spokesman Randy Belote claims the company's antitakeover provisions are common and very different from the more restrictive laws that Northrop is challenging in Ohio. Still, it seems Northrop wants to have its cake and eat it, too.

By Christopher Palmeri


Back to Top

BANK NOTES
Repaying the Loan Isn't Enough

Companies in need of short-term credit had better be prepared to offer their banks something in return--something beyond interest payments.

Half of corporate finance officers, from companies both large and small, say they are "required" or "strongly encouraged" to use their banks' other services--checking, savings, and investment accounts--if they want a loan for less than a year, according to a recent survey by the Association of Financial Professionals (AFP). That may not be new. But now, 25% say there's also pressure to use their bank for debt underwriting; 16% say the same of equity underwriting and merger advice. Without short-term financing, companies spend more cautiously and make fewer investments.

"I doubt there is a company that isn't facing this," says James Haddad, a board member at the AFP and also vice-president of corporate finance at Cadence Design Systems. Haddad's company actually cut ties with one bank had that demanded too much other business.

A 1999 act of Congress (Graham-Leach-Bliley) is partly to blame, says Jim Kaitz, the chief executive of the AFP, since it lets commercial banks offer services that were once sold only by investment banks.

By Kimberly Weisul



THE BIG PICTURE
a16mac11.gif


Back to Top


TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. America's Best Place to Raise Your Kids
  2. These Men Could Kill SarbOx
  3. This Year's Holiday Hit Toy: Zhu Zhu Pets
  4. A Big Loophole in Cap and Trade
  5. Wall Street Plays Hardball

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker



Media Kit | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers
McGraw-Hill Cos.