Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Where Do the Long Term Jobless Go? Not Into Jobs. (See: My Dad)

Posted by: Mark Gimein on January 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM

On the surface, the best news in last week’s generally positive employment data was the big fall in the number of “discouraged workers”—folks who want work but have stopped looking because they don’t see any jobs. From December 2010 to December 2011, that fell by 373,000, a big 28 percent year over year drop.

Figuring out what exactly this means is no simple thing. All the old cliches about statistics are doubly true about labor force data. If you’re looking for work, you’re “unemployed.” If you’ve stopped looking, you’re “discouraged.” But if you haven’t looked in the last year at all, you’re no longer “discouraged.” You’re not counted in the labor force. So what happened to all those discouraged workers? Did they find jobs? Or drop out of the labor force altogether?

Unfortunately the best bet here is door number two. The thing about discouraged workers is that they are (by definition) not looking for jobs, so they tend not to find them. Since December, 2010, the labor force participation rate has crept down by 3/10 of a percentage point, going from 64.3 percent of the population to 64.0 percent. That sounds like a small number, but it adds up to a lot of workers: if the labor participation rate had stayed the same, 815,000 more Americans would be working. That’s more than twice the decline in the number of discouraged workers.

Derek Thompson at The Atlantic has already pointed out the falling participation ratio. Thompson thinks (or hopes?) that as the economy improves the participation rate is likely to go up. Or, says Thompson, the long-term unemployed who’ve fallen out of the workforce

will represent a kind of permanent shadow-group of people neither working nor counted as unemployed.

Alas, that sums up the actual situation pretty well. My own father never recovered from losing his job in the early 1980s. For him, as for many others, unemployment faded into an awkward and uncomfortable retirement, while my mother went to graduate school and became the primary breadwinner. I may be biased by my own family’s experience, but that seems to me to be a fairly common experience.

The economy is clearly getting better. More folks are getting jobs, and fewer are moving into the discouraged pile. Bloomberg’s Timothy Homans reported yesterday the sharp drop in the number of underemployed—those who’ve had work, but not a full-time job. Those are the people who are in a position to benefit from the improvement. For those who did not manage to hold on to a part-time job, blew through their unemployment benefits, and gave up looking, there is no clear way back. The fall in the labor force participation rate seems to confirm what a lot of folks have suspected: that the path from long-term unemployment to discouragement to permanent joblessness is a more or less one way street.

Reader Comments

Wilmer Pelfrey

January 26, 2012 11:19 PM

Great website, I really liked your entry.

Eva McDonald

March 9, 2012 2:07 PM

Great article. I think this is very important and I think many people need to know about this. Car Service

Leigh Roediger

March 12, 2012 2:15 PM

I really do think that this was great and fun to read. I have enjoyed all of this information so much. This was really great. Car service

Trudi Stauff

March 13, 2012 1:34 PM

This was a great and fun article to read. I have enjoyed this information so much. I really love this great information and I have learned so much. Data Recovery Services

Staci Tabeling

March 13, 2012 9:11 PM

Really cool article in my opinion. I have enjoyed this so much. This was really very interesting and helpful to read. art for sale

Sara Kaneo

March 16, 2012 2:12 PM

I really love this awesome and fun site. This was really great and helpful for me to read. I really have enjoyed this. Plumber Sydney

Kiara Lemus

March 20, 2012 3:43 PM

Great information to read. I really have enjoyed this so much. This was really very interesting for me to read. Payday Loans Online

Misty Romano

March 22, 2012 2:39 PM

I really do appreciate this information so much. I have enjoyed this and I have learned so much from this site. xbox 360 repairs

Lizzy Buetner

March 29, 2012 2:22 PM

I have found this to be very interesting and so much fun to read. I cant wait to read more from this awesome and fun site. venta casas medellin

Kelley Wentzell

March 31, 2012 8:58 PM

I have found this information so helpful and interesting to read. I have learned so much from this very informative site. Watch bands

Suzy Hardert

April 2, 2012 4:43 PM

Very educational article to say the least. I really do appreciate this so much. This was really great and interesting to read. Thanks - bookkeeper melbourne

Melissa Hoetger

April 3, 2012 9:44 AM

I really do think that this was such a great and fun article to read. I cant wait to read more of this very interesting information. patio umbrella

Post a comment



"The Wealth Debate" is a running discussion of wealth, poverty, the economy and income inequality in the U.S. and the world. It was started shortly after the Occupy Wall Street movement sparked a global protest about the fallout from the financial crisis and money in politics. You can reach the editors, Dan Beucke and Mark Gimein, by email, or follow BloombergNow on Twitter to keep up with posts.

Analyses or commentary in this blog are the views of the author and or commentators, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloomberg News.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!