Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Th!nk Again: The Electric City Cars Return Without Ford's Help.

Posted by: David Kiley on May 05, 2008

The Norwegian electric car producer Think has reached across the Atlantic and established TH!NK North America in partnership with the leading clean-tech investors RockPort Capital Partners and Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers.
“The TH!NK city is the world’s only crash-tested and highway-certified electric vehicle and is ideal for markets such as California where we will initiate demonstration projects offering an exceptionally safe and fun car to drive,” said Jan-Olaf Willums, CEO of Think Global. “We are proud to partner with the two pioneering investors in the clean tech field and to launch TH!NK city in North America with them.”

TH!NK city is an environmental vehicle, emission free and 95 percent recyclable. It reaches a top speed of 100 km (65 miles) per hour and can drive up to 180 km (110 miles) on a single charge.

Ray Lane, a Kleiner Perkins Managing Partner and Chairman of TH!NK North America, said, “The transportation industry is undergoing its largest transformation since Henry Ford built the Model T. Today we are witnessing a seminal event – the first highway-capable electric vehicle intended for mass production, representing a big step toward a zero emission transportation industry.”

Th!nk previously made its way into the U.S. around 2000-2001 when it was in a venture with Ford Motor Co. Even though Ford chairman Bill Ford is the one with “green” running through his veins, it was then CEO jac Nasser who cut the deal with Th!nk to provide neighborhood electric cars (the golf cart-like vhicles you see in gated resorts and the like) and eventually an electric city car. Ford dealers also briefly sold Th!nk bicycles with an electric battery assist at dealerships.

Hey, those ideas were hatched back when’s stock was almost $500 per share and vendors I know were being paid with options. when Ford unloaded all the stray businesses Nasser had accumulated, like Kwik-Fit auto repair and the auto recycling (junk yards) business, the Th!nk business went along with the rest of the bath water.

Given the push for higher fuel economy and alternative powertrains today, it seems a little, or maybe alot, short sighted to have jettisoned Th!nk.

It wasn't so much that Ford didn't see any future for electric cars, it was that it couldn't make a business out of working with the Norwegians. One former Ford/Th!nk team member says the business case called for the Neighborhood cars to cost around $2,500-$3,000. They would sell for maybe $4,000 and the profit looked good. A funny thing happened. The cost actually climbed to $9,000!!!, even with a nickel battery. Yikes. That would mean charging at least $10,000 for each one to make any money. At $10,000, you are talking about a sightly used Kia Rio. I think I'd rather have the Rio unless I was trying to really impress myself and my friends.

Also, says my source, the Norwegians were tough to do business with. They aparently had no concept of outfitting any vehicles for the U.S. market tastes. In that, they behaved like Germans telling Americans they don't need cup-holders bcause we shouldn't be drinking anything while driving in the first place.

In fact, I drove a City Th!nk back then. It felt like driving an Igloo cooler with seatbelts and windshield wipers. If the Norwegians thought that car was going to capture American dollars in any great number, they were nuts.

This from a Ford spokesperson: "Ford exited the battery electric vehicle business in January 2003 with the sale of the TH!NK name and production facility to KamKorp of Switzerland. Extensive research and marketing showed that the vehicles were not economically sustainable at that time as part of a large-scale vehicle solution to global environmental problems.

The battery technology was inadequate at the time and consumer demand low - It was a technology in development not mature, not cost effective, not ready for mass production."

The Ford Th!nk partnership, while it lasted, seems a lesson in how just buying an asset doesn't assure anything. There was no work chemistry between the two companies. And while Ford may look short-sighted for punting the business back to Oslo, it's doubtful much would have come from it so long as the two sides weren't true partners.

I haven't driven the new City Th!nk yet. But perhaps Kleiner Perkins will have better luck.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Reader Comments


May 8, 2008 04:33 PM

City-Think car has dimensions that are too small to have any popular appeal in USA. This City-Think is smaller than a miniCooper. Other car companies making pure electric cars producing models with larger dimension will force out City-Think. Good try, though.


July 9, 2008 12:48 AM

Sign me up!! Actually, I am still waiting for at least a courtesy response to my properly filled out and submitted appliction for the Long Island, NY LIRR Ford Th!nk City Commuter Lease program. 5 multi-emails and a letter later, I never recieved so much as a courtesy update :-( . It's high time we move away from the 'overgrown vehicle' mentality. Either smaller autos or we're going to have to raise up the exit signs!

Sincerely SUVThis!


December 28, 2008 11:17 AM

Given the conditions that existed only 6 months ago with fuel being in the $4.00+ range I would consider the Think as an alternate transportation means to and from work and getting around town where most of the travel is anyway. I would keep my Ford '04 Mustang for longer trips but it would sure get a lot less use. Why give up that and go 100% green, isn't a two car plan worth while to at least think about? Ford needs to get back to the drawing board with the knowledge it learned on the Think, use some developed technology, and become a leader in the NEW cars of the future.


March 2, 2009 10:17 PM

Ford is goin to wish they never gave up on the ford think ! Im a manager at a moble home park and the Ford Think is the best think that has happened in a long time !! Hardly any maintanance and it keeps on running !!


March 7, 2009 12:31 AM

I think that Th!nk is the response to all who are very concerned about the responsability we have on the earth,let's be aware of any alternative we may have taking care of ourselves, the animal kingdom and the universe as our home.
I'am studing this case as a member of the IPADE in Chihuahua, Mexico. I wish this gonna be a success.


June 23, 2009 04:57 PM

The goal of the car is great but if you have any raods that are rated over 35 MPH you are out for a ticket (going too slow). I would love to have a car like this for all the running around I do as a contractor, but 25 MPH is too slow. 35 would work better.

Post a comment



Want the straight scoop on the auto industry? Detroit bureau chief David Welch , Dexter Roberts and Ian Rowley bring daily scoop, keen observations and provocative perspective on the auto business from around the globe. Read their take on such weighty issues as Detroit’s attempt at a comeback, Toyota’s quest for dominance and the search for an efficient car.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!