|
|
|
|
|
BusinessWeek: November 14, 1994 |
|
|
ONLINE FEATURES
Book Reviews
BW Video
Columnists
Interactive Gallery
Newsletters
Past Covers
Philanthropy
Podcasts
Special Reports
BLOGS
The Auto Beat
Byte of the Apple
Europe Insight
Eye on Asia
Getting In
Investing Insights
The New Entrepreneur
NEXT: Innovation Tools & Trends
On Media
Technology at Work
The Tech Beat
Traveler's Check
TECHNOLOGY
Product Reviews
Tech Stats
Hands On
AUTOS
Home Page
Auto Reviews
Car Care & Safety
INNOVATION
& DESIGN Home Page Architecture Brand Equity Auto Design Game Room SMALLBIZ Smart Answers Success Stories Today's Tip FINANCE Investing: Europe Annual Reports Bloomberg BW50 SCOREBOARDS Hot Growth Companies: 2008 Mutual Funds Info Tech 100 B-SCHOOLS Undergrad Programs Rankings & Profiles |
Up Front
FANNIE MAE'S LINE IN THE SAND FANNIE MAE, AS savvy politically as it is financially, is fighting a Clinton Administration plan to boost low-income mortgage lending. The Federal National Mortgage Assn., a federally chartered private company that buys mortgages from lenders and bundles them into bonds, has called in a cavalcade of big-time pols to help. At issue is a program by Fannie to spur lending for affordable housing in urban and rural areas, to low- and moderate-income homebuyers. Fannie chief James Johnson, a former Walter Mondale aide, is upset over pressure from the Housing & Urban Development Dept. to focus on minority and low-income buyers regardless of their location. And HUD has considered making Fannie police bias by lenders, which Johnson sees as unworkable. Fannie Mae complains that the HUD plan would ignore the urban middle class, potentially prompting their exodus from cities. Johnson has enlisted the mayors of Boston, Chicago, and Oakland as well as Representatives Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) to lobby against the HUD plan. Their impact has been felt. The word is that HUD thus far has backed off on the idea of Fannie Mae as an antibias enforcer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terms of Use | Privacy Notice |