BusinessWeek magazine: The most-read source of global business news
SEARCH SITE

Advanced Search
Top News BW Magazine Investing Asia Europe Technology Autos Innovation Small Business B-Schools Careers BusinessWeek Channels : BW Magazine, Daily Briefing, Investing, Asia, Europe, Technology, Autos, Innovation, Small Business, B-Schools and Careers
NOVEMBER 6, 2000
COVER STORY

By: Aaron Bernstein, with Michael Shari, in Jakarta, and with Elisabeth Malkin in Guatemala City


A World of Sweatshops

Progress is slow in the drive for better conditions


Walk through Tong Yang Indonesia (TYI) shoe factory, an 8,500-worker complex of hot, dingy buildings outside Jakarta, and company president Jung Moo Young will show you all the improvements he has made in the past two years. He did so at the behest of his biggest customer, Reebok International Ltd., to allay protests by Western activists who accuse the U.S. shoemaker of using sweatshops.

Last year, Jung bought new machinery to apply a water-based solvent to glue on shoe soles instead of toulene, which may be hazardous to workers who breathe it in all day. He installed a new ventilation system after Reebok auditors found the old one inadequate. TYI bought new chairs with backs so that its young seamstresses have some support while seated at their machines--and back braces for 500 workers who do heavy lifting. In all, TYI, which has $100 million in annual sales, spent $2 million of its own money to satisfy Reebok. But to Jung's surprise, it was a sound investment. ''We should make it all back after three years,'' he says. ''The workers are more productive, and the new machinery is more efficient.''

WINDOW DRESSING. TYI's efforts show how much progress Western consumer goods companies can make in cleaning up sweatshop conditions. In the early 1990s, many companies adopted codes of conduct requiring contractors to fix harsh or abusive conditions. Based on recent visits to factories in Asia, several companies--such as Reebok ( RBK), Nike ( NKE), Liz Claiborne ( LIZ), and Mattel ( MAT)--have finally begun enforcing their codes in the past year or two.

In fact, more than a dozen companies have joined efforts to create an industrywide system for verifying that consumer goods sold in the U.S. are made under humane conditions. The most ambitious effort involves the Fair Labor Assn., which grew out of a Presidential task force of companies and human-rights groups. It plans to send outside monitors to factories worldwide to ensure that they meet minimum standards on everything from health and safety to workers' rights to join unions.

The problem is that such companies are the exceptions. Although many multinationals operate facilities in Asia and Latin America that are as well run as any in the West, far too many still buy from factories where practices are appalling--especially in such labor-intensive sectors as garments, shoes, and toys. And many companies that claim to adhere to labor codes are still in the window dressing stage.

Then there are the tougher issues that even companies such as Reebok haven't yet grappled with. How can companies respect workers' rights to collectively bargain in China, say, which bans free unions and often doesn't enforce its own labor laws, impressive as they are on paper? Nor have most Western companies improved wages, which are often below what even governments like Indonesia define as enough to support a family.

Investigators for U.S. labor and human-rights groups estimate that Asia and Latin America have thousands of sweatshops, which do everything from force employees to work 16-hour days to cheat them out of already meager wages, that make products for U.S. and European companies. ''It would be extremely generous to say that even 10% of [Western companies charged with abuses] have done anything meaningful about labor conditions,'' says S. Prakash Sethi, a Baruch College business professor who helped set up a monitoring system for Mattel at its dozen factories in China, Indonesia, Mexico, and elsewhere. Abuses may actually be proliferating. Price hikes in U.S. retail garments have lagged inflation since 1982, and Asian factory owners complain they are under intense pressure to find new ways to squeeze out costs. ''American retailers are driving down prices, which ends up squeezing labor,'' says Robert Antoshak, vice-president at garment industry consultant Werner International in Reston, Va.

When accused by activists of buying from sweatshops, brand-name marketers have tended to dismiss the claims. But there's reason to believe the activists are often right. A recent BUSINESS WEEK probe found that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. ( WMT) bought Kathie Lee Gifford handbags in a Chinese factory where guards beat workers and owners deducted up to 70% of their pay for food and lodging (BW--Oct. 2). The National Labor Committee, a New York watchdog group, first made that charge in a May report on 16 Chinese factories used by Western companies. Each broke Chinese labor laws or the buyers' own codes, it says.

Some of the U.S. companies cited in the report, including Timberland Co. ( TBL) and New Balance, say they reexamined the Chinese factories and found most of the charges to be accurate. But others, including Huffy Corp. ( HUF) and Stride Rite Corp. ( SRR), refused to discuss the subject or let BUSINESS WEEK visit their factories. Meanwhile, a yearlong study by labor experts from Harvard and four other universities found that 13 factories making collegiate logo clothing for U.S. companies in seven developing countries were guilty of nonpayment of wages, lax safety, and excessive overtime.

TIP OF THE ICEBERG. Liz Claiborne Inc.'s attempt to improve conditions at a factory in Guatemala shows how hard it is for companies to clean up sweatshops. In 1998, the U.S. apparel giant began working with the Commission for the Verification of Corporate Codes of Conduct (Coverco), a group of Guatemalan and U.S. church and humanitarian activists, to monitor one of its suppliers, identified by local sources as Choi Shin, a Korean-owned factory near Guatemala City. Liz Claiborne released Coverco's report last year but declined to give out the factory's name or let BUSINESS WEEK inside it.

Coverco found a litany of problems. Choi Shin couldn't refute workers' claims that they didn't receive proper overtime payments or promised production bonuses. Workers lacked adequate protection when handling hazardous chemicals. Toilets and canteens were unsanitary. Some managers screamed at workers or pressured those who complained to resign. And many women, who comprise 88% of the plant's workers, said they were denied time off for doctors' appointments. One pregnant worker who had a note from her doctor about a high-risk pregnancy was not allowed to leave until five hours after she complained of pain. She lost the baby.

Coverco says the plant is slowly improving due to Liz Claiborne's pressure. But Choi Shin is the tip of an iceberg. ''The majority of [garment-exporting] plants have similar problems,'' says Coverco general coordinator Homero Fuentes.

The inability to form free unions means that workers often lack the leverage to make much beyond subsistence wages. The Modas Uno Korea plant in the Guatemala City suburb of Villanueva stopped paying workers on time in August and fired 22 who complained to the Labor Ministry. On Sept. 2, workers stormed the plant demanding back pay--and the company relented. Workers who stayed on said they were offered sewing machines instead of severance pay when the factory shut down in early October. ''They make you work more hours than they pay you for,'' says Albina de Perez, a fired worker who earned $25 a week at the plant. No one answered Modas' phone lines to respond to questions.

OUSTED MANAGERS. At least corporate responsibility programs seem to be showing faster progress in some countries, such as Indonesia, where suppression of labor activism has abated since the 1998 downfall of strongman President Suharto. Golden Adishoes, a run-down shoe factory near Jakarta, agreed to a host of improvements Reebok demanded as a condition for starting productioin there last summer. And the monitoring team assembled by Baruch's Sethi brought numerous changes to Mattel's two Barbie factories near Jakarta, clean and air-conditioned facilities that employ nearly 12,000 workers. Last year, Mattel removed hazardous solvents from the production process, says Tracey Rogers, manager of one Barbie factory. Mattel also began promoting workers who pass annual skills tests to higher-paying jobs. Rogers meets with 400 randomly selected workers every other week to hear their concerns. ''I'll be honest,'' says Rogers. ''This process has been good for us.''

Even Nike, the bete noir of labor activists, is finally making changes. Take Nikomas Gemilang, a sprawling, 50-building minicity near Jakarta that employs 22,500 workers making shoes for Nike and Adidas ( ADDDY). It is owned by Taiwan's Pou Chen Corp., the world's largest shoe manufacturer. At Nike's urging, Nikomas set a higher wage scale for senior workers and ousted managers who had yelled abuses at workers. The factory also improved safety and food in company dorms, which house 13,000 workers.

Pou Chen Chief Operating Officer Eric Chi says Nikomas is building a shopping mall, hospital, cinema, and a day-care center, which is needed because 85% of workers are female. ''We've heard about all this coming, and we hope conditions here will be better next year,'' says Yune, a woman in her early 20s who has worked and lived at Nikomas for five years.

Such improvements, however, are unlikely to quell Western protesters who insist multinationals exploit workers. Only a few U.S. companies submit to independent audits. And workers' pay, even if it's better than average for that country, is still pitiful considering the nearly 40% gross profit margins Nike and Reebok earn. TYI pays about 22 cents an hour, just over Indonesia's minimum wage. It gets around $13 for every pair of shoes it makes for Reebok, paying only $1 for labor. Still, TYI says that after paying for materials and overhead, its margins are just 10%. It can't just hike its price to Reebok. ''They look for suppliers who sell for the lowest price,'' says a TYI manager. ''If we aren't cheap enough, they'll go to Vietnam or somewhere else.'' The big profits go to shoe companies and retailers: The shoes typically sell for $60 to $70 a pair.

Given the huge oversupply of cheap labor in many developing nations, more widespread gains in the workplace are unlikely until workers can organize unions to demand changes--or unless there is a system to punish violators of international codes. Even under the programs set up by Nike and Mattel, they are free to sell their goods in the U.S. if it turns out they were made under abusive conditions. But their experiments do suggest that not every factory has to be a sweatshop to make the global economy work.



 BW MALL   SPONSORED LINKS
Buy a link now!

Get BusinessWeek directly on your desktop with our RSS feeds.XML

Add BusinessWeek news to your Web site with our headline feed.

Click to buy an e-print or reprint of a BusinessWeek or BusinessWeek Online story or video.

To subscribe online to BusinessWeek magazine, please click here.

Learn more, go to the BusinessWeekOnline home page
Back to Top
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. Apple's iPod Problem
  2. Detroit's New Bill: $34 Billion
  3. Auto Workers Give Up Notorious Featherbed
  4. Small Towns with Big Money
  5. Ford's Mulally Hits the Road

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO
DJIA 8591.69 +172.60
S&P 500 870.74 +21.93
Nasdaq 1492.38 +42.58

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker

Media Kit | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers
McGraw-Hill Cos.