Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Housing Starts: Borrowing from the Future?

Posted by: Peter Coy on January 18, 2007

Don’t be overly impressed by the government’s report today that housing starts in December rose 4.5%, while permits were up 5.5% for their first increase in 11 months. The report is good news for housing, but not quite as good as it appears at first construction.jpg

Action Economics tore apart the numbers in detail and wasn’t overly impressed. Some key points:

—Housing starts were seasonally weak earlier in the year, so they had some catching up to do.
—The weather was warm and dry on the coasts, which encouraged builders to start construction on some housing ahead of schedule. So there was probably some borrowing from future months.
—The number of permits has been lower than the number of starts for three of the past four months, including December. Since permits have to come before starts, that discrepancy is a negative indicator for the level of construction starts in coming months.

Action Economics’ bottom line:

“Though most real estate indicators show stability since the June-August downsizing, the production sequence of starts, construction, and completions should continue to show downward ripple-through effects until mid-2007, as the sector digests the inventory overhang.”

Reader Comments

Paul LeJoy

January 19, 2007 10:42 PM

Irrespective of the current real estate market conditions, real estate will always remain the best investment anyone can ever make. As a matter of fact, the investment-savvy buyer can make it really big in this type of market. This is the best market to be an investor. It's unlike those days when sellers here in the San Francisco Bay Area were discriminating because of multiple bids. Nowadays, it's very common to have sellers pay for closing costs and even give the buyer money back at closing for repairs, etc. Of course, one still has to be cautious and not overbuy (i.e. buy too many properties), unless of course they are buying at ridiculously low prices. With high numbers of foreclosures, the investor has many choices and multiple ways of building a solid foundation for perennial wealth in the future.

Paul LeJoy
San Francisco Bay Area


January 24, 2007 2:09 AM

Paul's remarks are laughable. We've seen a 400% increase in foreclosures in CA and this is only the beginning of the tsunami. The hokey financing schemes that allowed prices to become disconnected from incomes are going to be regulated out of existence when the consequences of selling a mortgage to anybody who could fog a mirror become apparent and prices will be in freefall when the additional foreclosures hit, most likely an increase of 1000% to 1500% from today's levels. House prices will correct to a level where the median home in an area is 4-5 times median income for that area in CA and 2-3 times in flyover country. It always has, always will. Once this ratio is obtained, this will be the time to pick up foreclosures, not before.


January 24, 2007 2:34 AM

The actual press release at states that housing starts rose "4.5 percent ±8.8%," i.e., one cannot statistically say they rose, a minor detail not mentioned AT ALL in the Nat Assoc of Home Builder's version at and even the fairly detailed articles at financial sites like where the data is discussed and interpreted somewhat. If even the finance sites selectively report government statistics, one must turn to the blogosphere where links are provided to the actual report.

The rest of the numbers in the report are even more negative, indicating clear declines of "18.0 percent (±7.1%) below the December 2005" (i.e., a real decline) levels, but the headlines were universally that housing starts "rose" or "jumped" and the financial markets reacted as if this were true. Housing is in a historic meltdown. There is an unprecedented oversupply and there will be an unprecedented price correction, worse than that of the early 1930s. Such statistically negligent reporting continues to amaze me!

Peter Coy

January 25, 2007 2:30 PM

Point well taken. I posted a blog entry today addressing your criticism. Here's a link to it:

Paul LeJoy

August 3, 2009 4:29 AM

I believe Dave got my point wrong. The market has been beaten really badly here in the San Francisco Bay Area but not anywhere near the alarming figures Dave alludes to. No way. I was right back in 2007. If investors practice the 1% rule then they will always win. That's what's happening now in our market. Inventory levels are down and we have started seeing values in some areas cripping up as demand outstrips supply. I'd welcome Dave's comments.

Post a comment



BusinessWeek editors Chris Palmeri, Prashant Gopal and Peter Coy chronicle the highs and lows of the housing and mortgage markets on their Hot Property blog. In print and online, the Hot Property team first wrote about the potential downside of lenders pushing riskier, "option ARM" mortgages and the rise in mortgage fraud back in 2005—well ahead of many other media outlets. In 2008, Hot Property bloggers finished #1 in a ranking of the world's top 100 "most powerful property people" by the British real estate website Global edge. Hot Property was named among the 25 most influential real estate blogs of 2007 by Inman News.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!