Posted by: Chris Palmeri on May 14
On the same day the RealtyTrac reports that the nation’s foreclosure filings surged 65% in April to 243,353, Reuters has this wild tale of one man responsible for nine of those foreclosures.
Shawn Forgaad, software product manager from Santa Cruz, Calif., says he speculated in a major way during the boom, buying nine houses with Pay Option or negative amortizion loans. Now his house of cards is crashing down.
One out of every 519 homes nationally received a foreclosure filing in April, RealtyTrac figures. Some 53,000 were repossessed. The country, meanwhile, marches on to what could be one million foreclosures for the entire year. Washington debates what to do to fix the mess.
California cities account for six of the ten U.S. markets with the highest foreclosure rates. Forgaad, the speculator, says he’s learned his lesson and is moving his family to lower-cost North Carolina where they can start fresh.
"On the surface it looks like total devastation but it's just the opposite,” Forgaad told Reuters. “I'm confident our lives will be much, much richer as a result."
Posted by: Chris Palmeri on May 13
Well even with the housing market’s collapse and the stock market’s tumble at least some people are still rich. That’s according to the latest data from the market research firm TNS.
The number of households with over $1 million in net worth outside of their primary residence increased 5.9% last year to an estimated 9.9 million nationwide. The mean age of these millionaires is 66. Their average net worth is $4.6 million.
Some 75% of them owned stocks. About 60% said their approach to investing hasn’t changed much. As the book The Millionaire Next Door pointed out a few years ago, most people get rich not by speculating, just by earning decent money, spending less than they earn, and socking away the difference.
New York is the metro area with the highest number of millionaires. There are 661,000 in the New York metro area, almost 10% of the population. Here’s the full top ten city list:
New York, 661,000 millionaires
Los Angeles 376,000
Chicago 343,000
Washington 264,000
Philadelphia, 232,000
Dallas 190,000
Boston 185,000
Miami 180,000
Detroit 178,000
San Francisco 178,000
We'll see what happens this year.
Posted by: Prashant Gopal on May 13
It must be be getting tough for the National Association of Realtors to put a positive spin on the real estate market when prices in most of the more than 150 metro areas that it monitors are down and, in many cases, way, way down.
But the group and its optimistic chief economist Lawrence Yun appear to be up for the challenge, judging from the May 13 first quarter home price press release with the title: “Mixed Home Price Performance Continues in Metro Areas, One-Third Show Gains.”
A better title might have been: "Two-Thirds of Metro Areas See Price Drops as the NAR Reports the Largest Quarterly Home Price Decline Since it Began Releasing Price Data in 1982."
The median home price for single-family homes fell 7.7% in the first quarter compared to a year earlier. The Sacramento metro area first-quarter median home price dropped a startling 29%. The median home price in Lansing, Mich. fell 27%. And in Sarasota, Fla. the median price declined 22%. Eight metro areas saw price drops of more than 20%. Only three metros saw increases of more than 10%.
But the press release skips over the big declines in California, Nevada, Florida, Arizona and Tennessee metros and notes, instead, that Binghamton, N.Y. median prices rose 11.8% from a year ago, prices in Peoria, Ill. jumped 10.4% and Spartanburg, S.C. home values leaped 10.1%.
Yun says that slowing sales in high-price areas is dragging down the national median home price and “the numbers don’t tell the whole story.”
Posted by: Chris Palmeri on May 08
Figuring out a solution to the foreclosure crisis is turning out to be a divisive issue. Nobody wants to see people get kicked out of their home, but as my wife said reading the paper yesterday “Can I get a reduction in my mortgage too?”
Congress is presently debating Rep. Barney Frank’s proposal and others to offer federal funds to restructure home loans. The Bush Administration says its against such a widespread bailout. FreedomWorks, a Libertarian non-profit with former House majority leader Dick Armey at its head, is busy drumming up opposition to such a bailout. Their AngryRenter.com Web site says its generated 44,000 emails from folks protesting the bailout to the White House.
They’ve got a funny video as well, telling the story of one guy (Bob) who bought more house than he could afford and a woman (Sally) who saved her pennies in the hopes she could buy a home down the road. “Tax Sally to bail out Bob?” the video asks. It’s what the site calls “Mortgage Loan Welfare.”
Posted by: Chris Palmeri on May 08
Everyone knows the price of foreclosure on home owners. They lose a place to live, their credit rating, whatever down payment they made, their hopes, their dreams.
New numbers from ratings agency Standard & Poors spells out the cost to mortgage investors. For the 2006 vintage of subprime loans it’s about 19% of the loan amounts outstanding.
How do they get those numbers? S&P figures an astonishing 42% of the loans made that year to borrowers with bad credit will go into foreclosure. Then it calculates that about 45% of the amount owed on those loans will be lost. Here’s the breakdown on that: 19% is lost due to the decline in the market value of the home. That’s about a $40,000 loss on a typical loan of $210,000.
Then there is the 26% lost to the costs of foreclosure. It can take a year or more to go through the whole process from when a borrower stops paying to when the house is finally sold and the lender recoups whatever money it can. There’s 13.6% of the loan amount lost in interest payments. About 3% of the home value the lender has to pay in property taxes. There’s 1% in legal fees, 6% to real estate agents, about 3% of the loan spent on home maintenance.
Nobody wins.
