Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Images of Hitler and 9-11 Haunt Some Ads

Posted by: David Kiley on September 9, 2009


It’s and advertising paradigm. Got no money? Shock ‘em, and get the media to carry the message.

Germany’s latest AIDS-awareness commercial turns to Germany’s most evocative character—Adolph Hitler—to generate shock, disgust, loathing and, well, attention. As Time Magazine points out (remember the free media thing), “That’s the point…”

The controversial ad, released online on Sept. 3 with a run-date on TV starting today, shows a couple having steamy sex in a dimly lit room (anyone who has ever stayed in a German hotel knows that the steam comes free on TV) with menacing music playing in the background. The viewer sees only the back of the man’s head until the very end, when the camera pans to his face — to reveal that it’s the Fuhrer himself, Adolf Hitler. Then the slogan flashes across the screen: “AIDS is a mass murderer.”

The use of the worst monster of the 20th century then begs the discussion. “is it ever okay to use Hitler in an ad?” Advertising Age this week also asked the question of its readers, “Is it ever okay to use images of 9-11 in advertising?”

In the case of Hitler, I’d have to say I’d be one squeamish ad director for a non-profit or advocacy organization greenlighting the use of Hitler’s image. On the other hand, if the ad campaign is truly for a good cause (i.e. AIDS prevention), I think I would hold my nose and approve when I saw the projections of how much free media we would get that we otherwise would have to buy or beg for. If I was the CMO of a private enterprise, even Bennetton, I’d surelsy say Nein to using Hitler. There is no legitimate for-profit enterprise I can think of that would be justified in using Hitler’s image, and I wouldn’t want my brand associated with the effort. Can I imagine some start-up high-caffeine sports-drink with a $100,000 ad budget doing it? Sure. But it wouldn’t be right, and I wouldn’t consider that a legitimate ad effort…just a couple of punks trying to ride a wave and get some cheap publicity.

Then, there is 9-11 images. Frankly, eight years later, it still feel like hallowed territory to me. I don’t even approve of political candidates using the images as props. Not even Rudy Giuliani, whose role in making the actual attack worse than it might have been has always been legitimately questioned. So many people died that day, and so many heroes died that I would be the guy in the room saying…”No people. It’s just not right. Think of something else.” Just because. I know when something is a wrong idea, and using images of the burning towers is wrong to sell something on so many levels.
Back to the non-profit argument.

Is a good non-profit justified as a means to garnering attention for a good cause? Belgian magazine Humo is infamous (and that was the point of course) for doing just about the tackiest ad in this space: Other images in the campaign were also chosen to fit the tagline “reading HUMO can have serious consequences.” In one ad, for example, Saddam Hussein was so captivated by the magazine he didn’t notice that the US army was right behind him invading his little hideout. Frankly, the Hussein ad was a better idea than the 9-11 ad. But I think when you are a bunch of upstarts sitting in Antwerp or Liege, what is likely to offend Americans’ sensibilities is not your first concern.

MTV Magazine Brazil also used the Tower images, comparing deaths from Aids, famine and poverty to the deaths caused in the 911 attack.

Text next to the towers in the ad: 2863 death
Text next to the man: 40 million HIV infected in the world.
“The world united against the terrorism should do the same against AIDS”

Text next to the towers : 2863 death
Text next to the boy: 824 million undernourished people in the world
“The world united against the terrorism should do the same against hunger”

Text next to the towers: 2863 death
Text next to a boy in the ad: “630 million indigents in the world”
“The world united against the terrorism should do the same against poverty”

Again…do we grant people trying to get across a non-commercial message a special license? It’s a tough one.
Lego did a campaign with the positive end message “Rebuild it” showing the dust cloud post WTC attack as their image. The image showed two towers seemingly made from Lego bricks. The ad was credited to Saatchi & Saatchi China in 2006. The creative team responsible later said they were pushing their own creativity and came up with the idea and that their managers at Saatchi had nothing to do with it. That was the story especially after Lego managers through a fit. Hmmmmm.

Thus far, use of these images, and the Hitler image, are confined to cause-related and fringe brands and companies mostly overseas. But, the Net makes these things global.

My own opinion is that we need get hysterical. Consider the sources, and judge accordingly. And, most importantly, never forget.

Reader Comments


September 9, 2009 3:33 PM

I don't see anything wrong with this ad, it may make people think. Why is it better to have a lying president and politicians, than to show histor for what he was. Whatever happened to the slogan, "never again"? There is no politically correct in a real war, as some of you are destined to find out, unless you wake up and do what is right and not what is politically correct. Funny how history repeats itself!


September 9, 2009 4:18 PM

We need to get "hysterical" ? Maybe you're hysterical enough for all of us.
Look, nothing is going to reverse history and the images from remarkable moments will always become icons. You don't like it, don't buy their stuff. But if you want to advocate a hysterical reaction to something you personally find offensive- in order to instigate some form of censorship - you're not much better than the guy in that photo.


September 9, 2009 4:54 PM

So funny how this story just expands the issue but placing the picture in question front and center. Gotta love the media. Amazing how this article just did exactly what the non profit group was doing.


September 9, 2009 8:27 PM

screw american sensibilities.


September 9, 2009 11:46 PM

At face value, this ad appears to compare homosexuals to Hitler.

Way to fail at advertising, morons.

conspiracy realist

September 10, 2009 8:54 AM

perhaps it should read 'western governments including those which created the special cancer program which produced AIDS.' including Rumsfeld who suppresses cheaper AIDS drugs than those he owns, from reaching Africa, for example.

I would suggest the image of 9/11 can reasonably be used in relation to promoting facts surrounding 9/11, anything else would be propaganda.

Now even 6 of the 10 9/11 commissioners who were involved in the 9/11 commission report state that it is their conviction that the US government agreed to lie, and cover-up the truth regarding the events of 9/11.

the report did not even dare mention WTC7 - a classic controlled demolition - in the words of Dr Paul Craig Roberts - former assistant secretary of treasury under Reagan has said - 'I was trained in engineering... I can tell when a building is being blown apart explosives - any fool can watch those films and see that those buildings are not collapsing - their being blown up.'

Time to wake up and reinvestigate 9/11, now.

conspiracy realist

September 10, 2009 9:03 AM

so almost three thousand died in the twin towers. most of the victims families believe it was an inside job.

millions have died from AIDS.

how many innocent civilians have those who 'united against terrorism' killed? how many have our media - who lie about evidence of WMD in Iraq killed?

those who wage the 'war on terrorism' actually wage THE 'war of terrorism' - we are quickly becoming united against our own overtly criminal governments. killing thousands is not acceptable in the USA - OR ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD.


September 11, 2009 3:34 AM

"Ability has nothing to do with opportunity."
-Napoleon Bonaparte


September 11, 2009 3:56 PM

this is dumb there is no reason to post such a dumb picture you guys are eww!


September 12, 2009 7:08 AM

There are many problematic aspects of this advertising campaign. Nazism and the global HIV epidemic have nothing in common and suggesting the opposite is dangerous. More information here:

Rodolpho Loureiro

September 25, 2009 8:35 AM

Yonah, maybe I might've missed something, but how does this ad compare homosexuals to Hitler?

Post a comment



News, opinions, inflammatory meanderings and occasional ravings about the world of advertising, marketing and media. By marketing editor Burt Helm, Innovation Editor Helen Walters, and senior correspondent Michael Arndt.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!