Posted by: Stephen Baker on June 02
I just came across this post about embargoed news releases. Quick response. I’m not the least bit interested in “embargoed” news. A news embargo, by definition, means you’re getting played (in a conspicuous way). It’s an invitation to join a herd.
No doubt it works on occasion. A beat reporter covering Microsoft or Oracle can’t afford to follow the competition on a software release. But for me, an embargoed release screams out from my inbox: “Erase me.”
The days for embargoed news are gone, made obsolete by more instantanious news coverage and communication channels. However, two exclusions still remain:
1) The exclusive... if offering an exclusive, embargoes are necessary to give proper time for supporting interviews/resarch.
2) Long-lead trade publications still rely on embargoed content... but less and less as timely news is covered online to complement print.
So feel free to delete away when you see embargoed releases... it's our job on the PR side to grab your attention with an exclusive or compelling pitch if we have a story worth the wait.
Michael Schultz
President, Message Infusion, LLC
www.messageinfusion.com
A rare gold out in the well deserved death of the embargo is the scientific press. Major journals still issue press releases under embargo. The idea is that all of the newspapers and outlets will hold back until the same time, creating a major splash for the journal.
Many journalists collude with this, probably because they see it as a way of getting their copy through the news editors.
One possibly valid use of the embargo is the release of reports that officially have to go to, say Parliament, before the great unwashed. Apart from that, it is hard to defend this practice.
In Blogspotting Senior Writer Stephen Baker and Associate Editor Heather Green take a look at how cutting-edge technologies are changing business and society. Whether its blogs or wikis, data crunching or data targeting, technology’s advances are reshaping the world that we live in.