| Label |
Who's Behind It |
What It Measures |
Drawbacks |
Its Take on HP
|
| EnergyStar |
Energy Dept., Environmental Protection Agency |
Power consumption |
Doesn't cover recycling or toxic materials |
16 notebooks and 1 desktop meet requirements as of July 30
|
| RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive) |
European Union, Britain |
Use of lead, cadmium, mercury, and other toxic chemicals |
Doesn't cover power consumption |
EPEAT-certified machines meet RoHS requirements (see below)
|
| EPEAT |
Green Electronics Council, PC manufacturers |
Incorporates RoHS and EnergyStar; adds recycling guidelines; issues gold, silver, and bronze ratings |
Often doesn't cover consumer PCs |
25 desktop/workstations, 23 notebook/tablet PCs qualify for some rating; almost all attain silver status, with one gold
|
| Greenpeace Guide to Greener Electronics |
Greenpeace International |
Toxic materials; recycling programs |
Doesn't consider power consumption |
Scores 5.3 points out of 10, placing it in 11th place behind Apple (AAPL) and ahead of Panasonic
|
| EcoLabel |
European Union |
Manufacturing practices; toxic materials; energy consumption; noise; recycling |
Hasn't gained traction for PCs |
HP products not covered
|
| EcoLogo |
Canadian government |
Manufacturing practices; toxic materials; energy consumption; noise; recycling |
Hasn't gained traction for PCs; more widely applied to printers |
Several printers qualify
|
| Blue Angel |
German government |
Incorporates EnergyStar; use of heavy metals, dyes; noise; emissions; ergonomic design; recycling |
Last updated June, 2006 |
Five PCs met standard as of 2004 |
Sources: Energy Dept.; Environmental Protection Agency; European Union; EPEAT; Greenpeace; the governments of Britain, Canada, and Germany; Hewlett-Packard.