Would Anyone Pay for MySpace Music?
What could MySpace deliver that people would pay for? Neither charging to hear music that used to be free nor crippling the free service by taking away music from people's playlists are very good options—and it violates the 10 commandments of freemium. Building a premium ad-free desktop, browser-based, or mobile service would merely put MySpace in more direct competition with Spotify—which is having its own troubles satisfying content owners—and other music subscription services that are still seeing more experimentation than customer traction. And for a company that has already admitted it has long stopped innovating, MySpace would have to overtake more nimble competitors to draw users to a paid music service while overcoming the perception that it's a messy-but-free one.
Asked if MySpace Music is nearing profitability, Miller told Ali: "On an operating basis, it's getting there, but no, because of the payments to the music companies," adding that he considers a paid model "something to look at." Fourteen months after MySpace Music's launch, with the four major labels on board as equity partners, time appears to be running out for its free, ad-supported model. It's worth revisiting Om's remarks from back then:
"If this works, then that is a good statement for the future of the music business. And if it doesn't, then it tells where the industry is going. In other words, this is a must-win move for the record labels, which are increasingly looking hapless and, well, unable to deal with change."
Also from the GigaOM network:
Netflix Is the iPod of Broadband
Palm Pre Sales in "Substantial Decline": Analyst
For Xcel Energy Customers, Microsoft's Hohm Is Now Live!
Practical H1N1 Prevention Strategies for Web Workers
Microsoft Admits, Then Denies, Copying Mac OS X