1x1



MARCH 7, 2006
Viewpoint

By Rick Boucher


Beware of a Two-Lane Internet

Some companies' efforts may mean larger outfits with financial heft get faster-priority access on the Net. At stake is the very essence of the Web


Rick Boucher


  STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story
Reader Comments
POLL INSTANT SURVEY >>
With which of the following statements on outsourcing do you most agree?

The benefits of outsourcing to corporate America far outweigh the costs
There's an even split between the drawbacks and rewards
Any benefits are overshadowed by the loss of U.S. jobs
Unsure

VIEW POLL RESULTS >>
  PEOPLE SEARCH

Search for business contacts:

First Name :
Last Name :
Company Name :

PREMIUM SEARCH
Search by job title, geography and build a list of executive contacts

Search by Zoominfo
  Tech White Papers

In the decade since Congress last rewrote the nation's telecommunications laws, our open and accessible Internet has become a wellspring for innovation, producing the likes of Google (GOOG), Yahoo (YHOO), eBay (EBAY), Amazon (AMZN), and thousands of smaller successful e-commerce enterprises. Collectively, the services they sell at home and abroad, and the jobs they have created, are driving forces of the 21st-century economy.


Yet storm clouds are gathering, threatening to inhibit further progress. And as we prepare this year to refine our telecommunications rules once again, a measure to assure continued Internet openness and accessibility is now required.

THE SQUEEZE.  Recently, executives at some telephone companies have indicated that their business model for providing broadband service will include not only charging customers for an Internet connection but also assessing a fee on Web sites to enable their customers to reach them more quickly.

Essentially, what these executives are proposing is the creation of a two-lane Internet where larger, more established Web sites with financial resources that pay for fast-lane access will be able to squeeze out smaller, emerging Web sites.

One must ask what will happen to the next Google or Yahoo struggling in a garage today, if new, innovative companies (that must often give away their services as they strive to become established) are stuck with inferior, slow-lane Internet access, simply because they lack the resources to pay the toll-booth keepers.

FUTURE HELP?  This potential problem would be eliminated by market competition in the delivery of high-speed Internet access. But many consumers today are up against a duopoly; a single telephone company and a single cable company are the sole broadband providers in most communities. Our experience with cell phones teaches us that, in general, the true benefits of competition only occur when a market is served by three or more providers.

But that competition does not exist today. In its absence, a firm principle of network neutrality is essential. With two simple new rules, and without hurting consumers or limiting innovation, telephone companies could launch an array of new services, including high-quality multichannel television.

Under the first requirement, broadband providers would be prohibited from blocking, interfering with, or impairing the ability of Internet users to access lawful content, applications, and services on the Internet. Under the second principle, the broadband operators would be prohibited from favoring themselves or their affiliates in the allocation, use, or quality of Internet access services.

PROTECTING CHOICE.  Consistent with these rules, a broadband provider could prioritize a category of its own bits, such as video, if it also prioritized all video bits traveling over its pipes at no cost to other service providers. Internet providers could also take reasonable and nondiscriminatory steps to manage their networks for technical efficiency, to protect network security, and to prevent illegal activity.

This simple, straightforward approach would preserve consumer choice and the openness and accessibility that have been the hallmark of the Internet. Under this approach, the incubation of new Internet-based products and services will continue to thrive. With the proposed merger of AT&T (T) and BellSouth (BLS), "last-mile" Internet links will be controlled by an even smaller number of companies whose reach will span the nation. A clear rule to assure Internet openness and accessibility is, therefore, even more urgently required.

Simply put, to foster the conditions that have contributed so much to our economy and our way of life, we need to avoid a two-lane Internet, controlled by incumbents manning toll booths. That's the net on net neutrality.

Rick Boucher represents the Ninth District of Virginia in the U.S. House of Representatives. A Democrat, Boucher is the co-founder and currently a co-chair of the Congressional Internet Caucus


 READER COMMENTS



 BW MALL   SPONSORED LINKS
Buy a link now!


Get BusinessWeek directly on your desktop with our RSS feeds.XML

Add BusinessWeek news to your Web site with our headline feed.

Click to buy an e-print or reprint of a BusinessWeek or BusinessWeek Online story or video.

To subscribe online to BusinessWeek magazine, please click here.

Learn more, go to the BusinessWeekOnline home page

Back to Top
Advertising | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers

Terms of Use | Privacy Notice | Ethics Code | Contact Us

Copyright 2000- 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill Cos.

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. Oracle's Sun Deal: Oracle May Need to Loosen Its Grip
  2. Stocks: Five Market Mistakes to Avoid
  3. Picks of the Week: Berkshire, Starbucks, Cisco, MasterCard
  4. The Cars You Won't See in the U.S.
  5. Stock Picks: Starbucks, Fannie Mae, Nvidia

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker