A Decade of Predictions for Green Transit by 2010

The top five predictions of the past decade for what kind of green transportation the U.S. would have by 2010

By Josie Garthwaite

The last decade has been a tumultuous one for green transportation in the U.S. Take the on-again, off-again electric vehicle market. We entered the 2000s with rules in California requiring automakers to offer EVs, but by 2003, state regulators changed the rules and many automakers dropped EV initiatives and focused on gas guzzlers. But here we are nearing the end of 2009, and automakers are now investing heavily in electric vehicles, natural gas cars are gaining favor in high places, and hydrogen cars are about as far off as ever.

Here's our take on some of the most persistent predictions of the past decade for what kind of green transit we'd have by 2010. We invite you to share your own thoughts on broken promises, dead-on predictions, or what kind of Jetsons-esque transit options you once thought we'd have delivered by this point in time. To get things rolling, here's our top five.

1. Prediction: Natural gas vehicles will go mainstream. "I think our time has come, and I think we're ready [for natural gas vehicles]," T.Boone Pickens told Green Car Journal in 2005. "You might say, well, if you're talking about Monday morning, probably not. But I'm talking about the next two or three years. I think there's going to be some real changes in the use of this fuel."

How it worked out: Pickens is still touting the potential of natural gas vehicles to help wean the U.S. off imported fuels, and the tech is now getting federal attention. Legislators introduced a bill this year aimed at encouraging the development and purchasing of natural gas vehicles. But natural gas vehicles are far from mainstream, and have yet to make a real dent in the U.S. consumer market.

2. Prediction: California will finally get high-speed rail. "It could be a matter of years—not lifetimes—before Californians can zip from the Bay Area to Los Angeles on a bullet train in less than three hours…the first train could roll out of the station in 2010," the San Jose Mercury News wrote in 1999.

How it worked out: Voters approved $9.95 billion in bond funding for the long-discussed project in November 2008, but this month the High Speed Rail Authority tossed the project's route back into limbo by reneging on its approval of an environmental study for a section of the train. According to the Sacramento Bee, the latest cost estimates for the line jumped to $42.6 billion, up from the previous estimate of $33.6 billion. The new numbers take into account inflation costs expected between 2012 and 2020, when construction is—in theory—supposed to take place. We expect it could be another decade or more before California residents will see the benefits of this technology.

3. Prediction: Hydrogen cars are just around the corner. "You'll be able to buy a commercially viable hydrogen car by 2009 in the showrooms in the U.S., along with regular fossil-fuel internal-combustion cars," Jeremy Rifkin, author of The Hydrogen Economy, told Salon.com in 2002. "Those hydrogen cars will use fossil fuels to get the hydrogen, but at least it's a bridge." California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said in 2004 that he envisioned every citizen in California having access to hydrogen fuel along state highways by 2010.

How it worked out: It didn't. Still waiting.

Business Exchange

Track and share business topics across the Web.