Posted by: Arik Hesseldahl on May 05, 2009
I’ve been waiting on this rumor for awhile, not because I have any knowledge of talks between them, but because it simply felt inevitable. As Valleywag tells it, Apple is in talks to acquire Twitter, talks which writer Owen Thomas describes as “serious.” Such a deal would have Apple paying $700 million in cash for the Web service.
Twitter is the major Web property of the moment, and so rumors about possible acquisitions aren’t a new phenomenon. Apple’s enormous pile of cash makes it a possible acquirer, meaning a rumor about such a deal was almost certain to emerge at one point or another.
I don’t know if this rumor is true, but I’m not prepared to dismiss it out of hand because it makes a great deal of sense.
Where’s the synergy, you ask?
Apple isn’t a particularly strong player on the Web — MobileMe is about the extent of it — and so Twitter would bring, among other things, a strong Web development team with a proven record for building successful products. Twitter founder Evan Williams has already sold one successful Web startup — Blogger.com — to Google.
But the real story is the iPhone. I don’t know if there are any statistics to back this up, but anecdotally I’ve noticed a lot of iPhone users tend also to be Twitter users. The Twitter client Tweetie is as of this morning ranked #32 on the list of top 100 paid iPhone applications. But the connections between the iPhone and Twitter go deeper than that.
Search the app store for the word “Twitter” and you find that not only are there a lot of Twitter clients, ranging from Tweetie to Twitterific to ZipTweet but you also notice that Twitter support is built in to an awful lot of iPhone Apps. USA Today’s iPhone app has Twitter support, for example. “Read It Later Free” does too. Several streaming radio apps let you post a link to what you’re listening to directly to your Twitter feed. “Mobile Fotos,” a photo-sharing app, supports Twitter and integrates nicely with all the major Twitter clients. I didn’t count them all, but there are lots and lot of iPhone applications that mention Twitter in their descriptions, and while some of those mentions are simply “follow us on twitter,” a great deal of them include features that integrate with Twitter in some creative manner. (If anyone knows the number, please say so in the comments.)
Apple might be seeing a trend among its applications developers that isn’t clear from the outside: If iPhone users love Twitter, then apps developers are building Twitter support into their applications. That gives you two arguments in support of an acquisition. Users love it, developers love it. Almost reason enough to bring the entire Twitter ecosystem under Apple’s control, and make it an official part of the iPhone ecosystem.
Whats the third? It’s cheap. Apple has $4.5 billion in cash plus another $20.5 billion in short term investments plus another $4.6 billion in net receivables, which all adds up to a cash hoard that’s just shy of the $30 billion mark. Paying $700 million for Twitter now would be a difficult offer to turn down for the Twitter guys, and it would give Apple control of the what’s arguably the most important Web company going right now, and thus keep it out of the hands of the likes of Google, Microsoft, and Facebook.
So while at first this seems a weird rumor — and I should be clear that I actually don’t think it is true — I’m simply not willing to completely dismiss it out of hand, because it makes a surprising amount of sense. Would Twitter be a good fit inside of Apple? That’s another question entirely.
Here’s a better scenario: Maybe Apple should invest in Twitter.
Let's see: 40% turnover rate. $0 profit. Zero announced plans to even attempt profit. Yep, sounds like a winner to me!
I don't see any synergy.
If Apple needs the development team, they can just hire the people without buying the whole company. Track record doesn't really mean much in the Internet space. Every new web project is different.
How would Twitter make money for Apple? It can't even make money for itself.
Remember the story of eBay buying Skype?
Why this makes no sense (and even less dollars and cents).
The internets (brief) history is full of trendy, failed, Hot Comodities.
In brief:
Assertion 1: Apple is 'soft' in the internet space and should acquire Twitter for the development team.
Reasons this is wrong:
1.) last I checked Apple is a device maker. All of their software is designed to enhance/promote/tie to their hardware. How does tieing up with a free webservice promote Apple hardware?
2.) Even if Apple was in the market what does the purchase get you, talent wise. The founder is already a proven 'hype and dump' developer (blogger.com sold to google). You pay him, he goes on to his next project. The dev team, who's ticket you just punched, has little incentive to stick with you.
3.) While Apple has about 20B in cash and cash equivelents, where is the ROI on twitter? It is a VC loss venture with no profit model and no plans to become profitable.
4.) Twitter isn't a 'technology', it is a web service application. With a greater than 60% churn rate (Danes number is actually the retain number, not the churn), it looks like an electronic hoola hoop to me.
A better 'fit' would have been for Apple to buy Sun Micro and step fully into the business arena. But that ship has sailed.
the whole article is related to iphone and twitter.. but how are they going to make money? i don't think it is just because twitter might increase iphone sales... it is too simple...
What is Twitter? And why don't I care to know?
Strategic investment from one of the big players would make sense. Everything else is just hype.
$700m, you gotta be kidding.
For that amount of money Apple can easily double that by getting the best deals from some suppliers for their products.
The ROI for the twitter is how many years? LOL
Here are a couple of reasons why not:
1. Twitter is not profitable
2. Apple has no expertise in running this type of business.
3. Owning Twitter would put Apple in competition with other applications running on iPhone. Is the iPhone a platform or does Apple plan to compete on software applications?
Just because "they have the money" does not make it a good idea.
What business does Apple think they are in?
Companies do tend to move into adjacent markets during down-cycles, but this one is questionable.
If Apple buys Twitter I will finally have a reason to join Twitter.
Twitter's API is why this is so important. Twitter matters. Like email did back in the 80s
Twitter is the biggest waste of time I've ever encountered. How vain and stupid to think that people want to follow your every mundane activity. I would worry about Apple's stock value if they made such a bad investment. Everything I've read says that Twitter's days are numbered anyway.
While I am skeptical that Apple would make a deal like this, and it’s always silly to comment on (rumored) price tags on pre-revenue companies, I will say this; there is a logical scenario for Apple to acquire Twitter.
First off, the status update message has emerged as the ultimate social gesture, and we all know how Apple is all about driving consumer engagement.
Quantitatively speaking, it is something that Facebookers, MySpacers, tweeters, LinkedIn users do 1-10 times a day (whether they think of the activity as status updating or not).
Now, if you married the simple atomicity of the update message with the ability of the messaging client to process “payloads” like pictures, videos, songs, contacts, locative data, documents, URLs, etc., you have a recipe to turn Apple's MobileMe service into its original moniker of “Exchange for the Rest of Us,” all the while having a core messaging infrastructure that is lightweight and portable enough to run on desktops, iPods, mobile devices and TVs.
Here’s a post that I wrote, which provides a straw man analysis of what such an infrastructure might look like:
"Right Here Now" services: weaving a real-time web around status
http://bit.ly/i40h
Check it out if interested.
Cheers,
Mark
--
follow me via twitter @netgarden
This makes no sense.
As you point out, iPhone users are Twittering away. There are tons of Twitter apps. However, you give the already existing lovefest as a reason for the acquisition instead of arguing against it.
If Apple buys Twitter, what do they get out of it, beyond "Twitter, brought to you by Apple"? There's no revenue there. There aren't that many engineers there that could go and work on other projects at Apple instead of staying focused on Twitter. If Apple wants people, Apple can hire them directly.
Apple can't buy Twitter and then make it an Apple exclusive service, as that would defeat the purpose of Twitter.
It may have made sense if Twitter had revenue, or if Twitter was wildly popular, but somehow not easily accessible via Apple products and services...thus Apple could buy Twitter and bring it to their customers.
But the bottom line is that Twitter makes no money, is likely to be eclipsed by features from Facebook and others, can't be made Apple exclusive, doesn't provide any unique technology to Apple, won't bring Apple new customers, and already works well with Apple products.
Here is another suggestion to use those $700 Million - Apple will contribute iMACs in that amount for institutes which need it. It's a great social responsibility and PR and good goal. WIN-WIN Situation.
Google + Ripoffreport.com would be a pretty POWERFUL combo too!!! Perhaps it would be TOO powerful, huh?
Google + Ripoffreport.com would be a pretty POWERFUL combo too!!! Perhaps it would be TOO powerful, huh?
I think we might be losing sight of what Apple is - quite frankly - absolutely brilliant at.
Imagining what others couldn't.
While I agree that the article above is disconnected in plausible reasons (except the app developments) I do believe, and no I don't own shares although I should, is that Apple has demonstrated time and time again that they have they ability see far beyond the obvious.
I won't be surprised in the least if this rumour proves true and Twitter could do much worse than being acquired by a company known for its visionary capabilities.
With the economy likely to get worse than better any time soon, why should Apple spend any money except on things vital to it's well thought out plans? Conservative investment is a good idea and in the interest of stockholders. Maybe half a billion in gold would be smart, or buying a controling interest in IBM. Because Apple has 30 billion in relative liquid assets and even more in buildings, etc., including a bunch of brilliant innovators under contract, and NO DEBT, they could buy several giants of the industry. I don't think they would even spend pocket change on
With the economy likely to get worse than better any time soon, why should Apple spend any money except on things vital to it's well thought out plans? Conservative investment is a good idea and in the interest of stockholders. Maybe half a billion in gold would be smart, or buying a controling interest in IBM. Because Apple has 30 billion in relative liquid assets and even more in buildings, etc., including a bunch of brilliant innovators under contract, and NO DEBT, they could buy several giants of the industry, most of which have large amounts of debt. I don't think they would even spend pocket change on something like twitter.
People, don't look at the service Twitter provides, its the skills of the employees they want. Just like PA Semi. It's all about the skills.
Twitter and the iPhone really DO go well together. Twitter was built for text messaging... but iPhone adds ability to add photos and web links etc. It's well suited to the small screen, and it's meant to be an everywhere app.
Apple gets this synergy for free.
But if I'm Apple, I might want to own Twitter just to keep it out of the hands of Google, MS, etc. To gently guide it/keep it on an iPhone friendly track. Meanwhile, it could really accelerate the use of Twitter in apps by building Twitter support into the iPhone OS APIs.
For a company with Apple's bank account, Twitter is cheap.
Twitter and the iPhone really DO go well together. Twitter was built for text messaging... but iPhone adds ability to add photos and web links etc. It's well suited to the small screen, and it's meant to be an everywhere app.
Apple gets this synergy for free.
But if I'm Apple, I might want to own Twitter just to keep it out of the hands of Google, MS, etc. To gently guide it/keep it on an iPhone friendly track. Meanwhile, it could really accelerate the use of Twitter in apps by building Twitter support into the iPhone OS APIs.
For a company with Apple's bank account, Twitter is cheap.
there's a lot of people who doesn't want Apple to get Twitter.
where's my comment? i was saying many people dont want apple to acquire twitter.
The CIA seems the best fit because it's in the business of collecting info on you. The DIA too, the NSA, or any such dept. in the executive branch whose stock in trade is spying, collecting, codifying, and comparing.
Hey, an interesting scenario involving the selling of Twitter is for any of the spy agencies to approach Apple covertly, asking them to buy Twitter but then hand it over with due compensation, of course.
Citizens will then be able to continue to reveal everything about their lives -- their friends, their picadilos, hates, likes, enemies, what makes then tick -- in order to feed them an unlimited amt. personal, perhaps even corporate data of who you are. The CIA would love this turn of events.
Now, these agencies have already gotten the OK from the US Fascist Act to spy on you, and so they have nearly unlimited access to your words, but please continue to write about yourself in detail, revealing all to ease their effort.
You know...it's funny; It seems that the US Fascist Act codifies what is already happening voluntarily.
As much as the rumor mill is pushing this story, it flies in the case of common sense.
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/05/common-sense-apple-will-not-twitter.html
Apple is NOT eBay.
"But the real story is the iPhone"...and it seems that the iPhone platform is moving up the bandwidth scale towards interactive video. While this opens up plenty of new applications/users there is a serious bandwidth access issue that Apple has to overcome. Twitter will not solve that issue - quite opposite, it will create more bandwidth demand. Apple is unlikely to accept user experience degradation and will certainly do something to create a bigger bandwidth pipe access for all iPone/iPod Touch/videocon Macs. Why not just carve out the consumer residential gateway part from struggling Lucent/Alcatel and let them keep the non-consumer infrastructure business. Apples new chip platforms would be integrated into the residential gateways and all networked Apple devices and Apple has gained the DIGITAL HOME in addition to the badly needed higher bandwidth access for new applications. Once that is done Twitter & other hot digital life web applications could make sense.
Rolf Bork, BOD mediaf.com & sensitivetech.com
If Apple did buy it you would probably be limited to a single Apple approved desktop app, RT would be banned because of the DRM and would use a file format incompatible with any other web platform.
However, 'Appler', as it would be know, would look really cool and fan boys would send 'Apples' from their iPhones flaming anyone who dared criticize The Holy One or the $0.99 per 'Apple' charge
And then after we post a tweet, Apple will review it and only then post it on the Twitter site!
Is this journalism (or gossip!)?
This doesn't make any sense and the article doesn't have any valie point (maybe some journalists should go to B-school).I hope and believe Apple is a lot smarter than this and do have any strategic sense. Just bad internet gossip.
No.
Makes sense for self-promotion like a single sponsor of a charity run or sports tournament.
$700 is a cheap ad campaign to a billboard that reaches millions of people by passion and persuasion. A way to introduce it's products to the windows world with user testimonials built in. Cheers, FragerFactor
Apple isn’t going to buy twitter. Knowing Apple, they are meeting with founders of the company to ask if they can use “non public” APIs. Why? So Apple can say they have "exclusive" features for iChat. Take iChat + Tweetie for the desktop + a app for the iphone = you got "exclusive".
http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-mac/
A better use of 700 million that is more in line with their core mission ... reduce price on iMacs and MacBookPros by $500, which would break the backs of HP, Dell and probably Microsoft. A trend I see in the Microsoft world is that their developers are switching to macs and are running Parallels or VMWare. Even people inside Microsoft are doing this.
BannerExperiment.com + Apple would make a good deal?!
maybe apple was spying on twitter gathering information keeping the enemy at bay or maybe they really will buy them. it seems like they have about 25,000 developers on their side now working for them so it doesn't seem likely. they will just come out with iFollow in a few months i think.
Are you looking for Model Toys? Do you know where to buy Model Kits and Model Aircraft? Here we recommend you a good online store to buy Model Ships & Model Boats, Model Military as well, it is a good chance to buy because Model Tank and Model Cars For Sale! This store has all the toys including Model Motorcycle and Scale Model Toys. What's more in there you can find Christmas Gifts even Model Transformers! a Cosplay Shop too, it sells Cosplay Costumes Naruto and Cosplay Mantle, as well as Cosplay T-shirts.
Nothing is able to fulfill, as long as confidence.Snow boots originated in Australia ugg boots sale about Australia cheap ugg boots leather boots date back to 1978, called a young Australian winter boots surfing Brian Smith took part of a sheep leather discount ugg boots to America. In the past years, the Australian cheap uggs used in New Zealand the uggs on sale, however, sewing sheep with business mind is the young man bold attempt to the Australian australia ugg boots traditional products to the United States.At that time, he took a few double ugg boots 2010 sheep with full of passion.
"Gucci Bags" by discount gucci handbags was founded in 30 BC. In Florence, he opened the first store to launch a series of iconic products, including the famous bamboo bag. gucci shoulder bag from renowned international fashion industry. As time goes by, this well-known clothing store has been given a luxurious, sexy, modern qualitygucci purses. It is the ultimate in modern luxury of making. In 1970, the brand began to getinvolved gucci bags discount industry. Since then, it is introduced, such as: Envy perfume, Eau De Toilette, Gucci Handbags Sale, and later introduced Envy me2 perfume sexy, charismatic fragrance.
Tiffany is one of the most copied designs in the world. They are copied and imitated for two reasons, the first Tiffany jewellery being to try and trick people. A slightly more innocent use is to be sold to people which cannot afford to buy the real thing Tiffany Charms. Imitation Tiffany Bracelet can still look the part but doesn?t have the heavy price tag. Tiffany Rings is considered as the best jewelry designer around which is why many celebrities are proud to be seen wearing beautiful pieces of tiffany jewelry. shamwow Actually there are quite a few tiffany silver jewelry knock offs around.
Gamers ought to know cabal alz if they really like to play this game. All gamers want to buy cabal gold to promote their character level easily, more cabal online alz they own, more items they can buy in game. While we provide you cabal online gold, surely you can get them at cheap prices.
Industrial design patent Canada Our clients include some of the world’s most sophisticated and influential high-tech multinational, American and Canadian companies. They trust us to draft and prosecute their patent applications, and to manage the portfolio for these applications worldwide.
I more or less agree with you.
[url=http://www.vipuggstores.com/]classic ugg boots[/url] have become very popular among women and men all over the world. As a fashion statement,
[url=http://www.vipuggstores.com/ugg-5818-classic-tall-boots.html ]ugg boots uk[/url] is a great choice for people who want to give their boots an edge.
you have my vote.
[url=http://www.chiflatiron4u.com]chi flat iron[/url] is the Best For Hair Straightening and it will make your hair most good-looking and you will be high-handed of.
Oh, I agree with you. A [url=http://www.topghdmart.com]ghd hair iron[/url] Can Make It Easy To Style Your Hair.
[url=http://www.topghdmart.com/special-ghd-hair-iron/ghd-kiss-pink-mk-iv-hair-straightener-and-lip-glosses-set-limited-edition-for-2008.html ]ghd hair straightener[/url] will make your hair get it looking its best.
I more or less agree with you.
[url=http://www.vipuggstores.com/]classic ugg boots[/url] have become very popular among women and men all over the world. As a fashion statement,
[url=http://www.vipuggstores.com/ugg-5818-classic-tall-boots.html ]ugg boots uk[/url] is a great choice for people who want to give their boots an edge.
you have my vote.
[url=http://www.chiflatiron4u.com]chi flat iron[/url] is the Best For Hair Straightening and it will make your hair most good-looking and you will be high-handed of.
Oh, I agree with you. A [url=http://www.topghdmart.com]ghd hair iron[/url] Can Make It Easy To Style Your Hair.
[url=http://www.topghdmart.com/special-ghd-hair-iron/ghd-kiss-pink-mk-iv-hair-straightener-and-lip-glosses-set-limited-edition-for-2008.html ]ghd hair straightener[/url] will make your hair get it looking its best.
kamas dofussynonyms: How do we want playstation network cardspsn cardeverquest2 platinumeq 2 platit really describe what silkroad online goldsro goldrunes of magic goldthe Franks as the manufacturer provides rom goldguild wars ecto
one day i went shopping outside,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most they are Your website is really good Thank you for the information christian louboutin shoes christian louboutin shoes links of london charm bracelet links of london charm bracelet christian louboutin boots christian louboutin boots christian louboutin sandals christian louboutin sandals christian louboutin peep toe christian louboutin peep toe louboutin shoes louboutin shoes christian louboutin pumps christian louboutin pumps christian louboutin heels christian louboutin heels Thank you for the information
To establish a new effective method,tiffany jewelry,Welcome to read following news:I like it!links of london,tiffany jewelry sale.
Nike Dunk
Nike shoes
Nike Air Max
Nike Dunk
nike shoes
Puma Shoes
UGG Boots
Adidas Shoes
Supra Shoes
Nike Shoes
oil paintings
air jordan shoes
Nike Dunk
Nike shoes
Nike Air Max
Nike Dunk
nike shoes
Puma Shoes
UGG Boots
Adidas Shoes
Supra Shoes
Nike Shoes
oil paintings
air jordan shoes
I had never see a blog batter than this blog, I like this blog very very much.By the way, do you like my products: solar street lights, street lights, street lighting
louboutin knockoffsThe Ritz line offers abercrombie clothessmall clutch bags Tiffany Jewelry on salecovered entirely with Swarovski Crystalsclassic tall boots. Because they comejerseys wholesale in a range of styles - from classic designs hocky Jerseysto contemporary fashion statementsJimmy Choo Shoes - they work for a range of womenAlexander McQueen Shoes. They run from $700 to $750Abercrombie Women Sweater. These classic bags Abercrombie Men Poloscome in solid colorsTiffany & Co. Earrings that let the design Tiffany & Co. Money Clipsand crystals shineUGG Australia Womens Metallic. The contemporary bags UGG Australia Women's Sandraalso feature crystalsUGG Australia Adirondack, but they are used to createAbercrombie Women Hoodies modern symbols such as a handgunUGG Australia Ultra Tall, skull and crossbonesHandbags Designer, and an anchorLeather Handbags. All of the Ritz bags closePrada Handbags with a crystal encrustedDolce & Gabbana handbags, gold-toned push-lockChristian Dior handbags. The bags are lined in supple leatherJimmy Choo handbags and most have a detachable shoulder chainMiu Miu handbags. All bags from this collection come with a plushVersace handbags , drawstring bag for storagecheap shoes. They measure about 5 inches wide by 3 inches high and 1inches deep.
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Bag-White 201292
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Handbag-Black 163805
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Satchel Bag-Apricot&Red
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Leather Shopping Bag-Silver
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Shopping Bag-Apricot 181491
Famous Gucci Canvas With Cowhide Shopping Bag-Apricot 181491
ed hardy
cheap ed hardy
ed hardy sale
ed hardy uk
ed hardy clothing
ed hardy for sale
cheap ed hardy clothing
ed hardy clothing sale
ed hardy mens
cheap ed hardy mens
ed hardy mens active wear
ed hardy mens t-shirt
We welcome you to visit our website http://www.jordanmvp.com.There you can find many different kinds of cheap Air Jordan Shoes .We are a wholesaler of the Air Jordan Shoes . Here we can offfer you traditional Air Jordan 1 shoes , beautiful Air Jordan 2 shoes and some other cheap Air Jordan Shoes , such as Air Jordan 10 , Air Jordan 23 and others .Both are in its superior quality .Also we can offer you with our best services for discount jordan shoes. It is a good chance for you to buy now .Nowadays ,we published a new kind of Air Jordan ,that is the Air Jordan Force line .They are so good that when you see it , you will like it and are willing to own one . Like the Air Jordan Force 3 , colorful Air Jordan Force 4 ,you may never miss it .Especially now Air Jordan Force 5 are released in today market .And the Air Jordan Force 6 will be released recently . So do not miss the chance to get it .Hope hear from you soon .Thank you !
A blog on the daily doings of Apple and the many companies in its orbit, with insight and analysis by two longtime Apple-watchers BusinessWeek Senior Writer Peter Burrows and BusinessWeek.com Senior Technology Writer Arik Hesseldahl.
Leave us a voice message. Learn more.