Businessweek Archives

The Resignation of US Attorney Kevin Ryan: What it Could Mean for Apple


?? Apple and Apple Making Up? |

Main

| LG and Prada Team On iPhone-like KE850 Release ??

January 17, 2007

The Resignation of US Attorney Kevin Ryan: What it Could Mean for Apple

Peter Burrows

Kevin Ryan stepped down today as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California. That could potentially be relevant to Apple, because Ryan has led the government's effort to prosecute Silicon Valley companies on options-related transgressions, such as backdating. Last July, Ryan brought the first backdating indictment, against two former Brocade Communications executives. Just around that time, he also created a backdating task force . And sources say it is his office that is scrutinizing Apple's books, as well.

A spokesman for Ryan, Luke Macaulay, says Ryan has been thinking about leaving since last summer, in part because he?? got two sons heading for college. In other words, maybe he felt it was time to give up public service for a while, and head for the more lucrative private sector. But there?? also been much talk about an exodus of veteran prosecutors and others during his tenure, and criticism of his management style (check out this piece from a while back in SF Weekly). Sources tell me that Ryan, as the SF Weekly story suggests, got plenty of negative feedback in an internal review earlier this year.

And in October, DOJ headquarters in Washington sent out a panel of prosecutors from around the country to interview a dozen or so of those that had jumped ship during Ryan?? tenure. My sources say such an inquiry of former staffers is rare, and maybe unprecedented. Macaulay confirms this external review occurred, but isn?? sure how common it is. Also, he said no final report has come out of it so ??t?? too early to draw any conclusions from the evaluation.?Still, given that Ryan’s departure was a “mutually agreeable decision with Washington,” according to Macaulay, Ryan’s higher-ups were evidently concerned about something.

So what does Ryan’s departure mean for Apple? That depends on whether his replacement pursues backdating cases as aggressively as he has. As it is, Macaulay points out that Ryan has publicly said it is unlikely his office would indict more than five companies (the math is complicated: Ryan has said his office is most intently examining red flags at ten to twenty percent of twenty five of the companies now being investigated. That’s 2.5 to 5, to be exact).

That’s not a gigantic caseload, but some former government prosecutors and defense attorneys I’ve spoken with wouldn’t be surprised if it fell even more. Ryan, as the guy in charge when the backdating emerged as a full-blown scandal earlier this year, might be more invested in seeing it through than his successor might be. Even now, says one source, “the steam seems to have come out of [the DOJ’s prosecution of backdating cases) a bit.

That’s not to say the folks at Apple should be sleeping any easier. No doubt, a decision to charge Apple would create a steam whistle heard round the world, in no time flat. Still, my guess is that Ryan’s departure means the odds of criminal charges against Apple or Steve Jobs got a bit longer today.

11:10 PM

Stock Options

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/

Okay now, is something up? Carol Lam the US Attorney here in San Diego is also resigning, many here think that politics is involved. She was the one who went after Representative Duke Cunningham who is now serving a long term bribary. She focused on high stakes white collar crime more so than relatively minor offenses that fell under her purview.

See http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070117-9999-1n17lam.html

Posted by: Perry Clease at January 18, 2007 01:03 AM

I think we'd all like to see this back-dating witch hunt disappear.

Posted by: tom B at January 18, 2007 01:28 AM

"the odds of criminal charges against Apple or Steve Jobs got a bit longer today." What does that mean? "longer" Please be more specific.

Thanks,

dg

Posted by: David Garon at January 18, 2007 11:11 AM

Are you sure this isn't related to Bush's ongoing purge of US attorneys?

See http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002347.php

Posted by: Frog at January 18, 2007 12:10 PM

I wouldn't be surprised if the administration is not pleased about the fact that businessmen are being caught in scandal. Conservatives find their backing coming from this direction. They likely are frustrated that their campaign funding might dry up as a result of this.

Is that cynical? Can we think otherwise, after knowing what this administration is capable of?

Posted by: melgross at January 18, 2007 04:05 PM

You need to take off that tinfoil hat melgross. Northern California businessmen, especially those in Silicon Valley, are not Repbulican supporters. Maybe you missed the fact that Steve Jobs brought Al Gore on to the Apple Board of Directors.

Posted by: Joe at January 19, 2007 03:04 AM

Joe, there's no tinfoil hats here. There's news. The spin machine (such as Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly) loves to use the words "tinfoil hats," and none of them really report news, because they all seem to be allergic to facts.

Read the article: Feinstein claims White House using Patriot Act to oust prosecutors

http://www.kget.com/news/state/story.aspx?content_id=cddb8520-8276-443e-86b9-ccbe760149de

A question by Feinstein does not prove anything. However, those of us who follow news, rather than spin, understand that this administration is the most dishonest, most self-serving, most anti-justice administration that this country has ever had in history, bar none.

Posted by: Cougar at January 21, 2007 12:27 PM


We Almost Lost the Nasdaq
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

 
blog comments powered by Disqus