? New Yahoo Mail: Wish I Liked It Better |
| HP Scandal: Now, It Leads to CEO Mark Hurd ?
September 19, 2006
Video Tagging Gets Cool
We've all tagged photos on Flickr. Next up, we'll be increasingly tagging videos in new and innovative ways. I've seen two interesting announcements on this recently. On Sept. 14, ComVu, which hosts people's mobile video blogs, unveiled its automated geotagging software that automatically records the location a cell phone video was taken at. The feature will allow for dynamic mapping: Say, you want to see what's been happening at Times Square lately. You might go to a video sharing site and, using tags, do just that.
The other cool video tagging announcement comes from Motionbox, a personal video sharing site that appears to be similar to YouTube. The outfit just introduced its deep video tagging feature, allowing users to tag favorite parts of a video so that they and others can jump directly to those parts. This feature is going to become increasingly valuable as personal videos, taken by camcorders and cell phones, get longer.
As digital video takes the market by storm, it's these kinds of capabilities that will change the face of video search. Today's video search tends to be cumbersome and ineffective. Users of most video sites, like YouTube and Google Video, end up simply checking out the videos other users liked: the top-10 list. Tagging could change that and allow for better contextual searches.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Click.TV has allowed you to tag and jump directly to parts of a video since it was introduced several months ago.
Posted by: Shel Holtz at September 20, 2006 11:46 AM
YouTube and Google Video are a joke! Even with a new way to search (such as tagging), these sites will eventually disappear. - In the future we won't be searching, by using "words." The online world of today, teems with text, still images, and silly videos. It's a flat surface, instead of a 3-D picture plane. - In the distant future, our 3-dimensional butlers will doing our searches.
Posted by: Jason at September 20, 2006 04:07 PM
ComVu’s method of using automated tagging based on location adds real value. End user tagging of video is a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t solve the problem of Folksonomy, i.e., inconsistent word choice, spelling differences, etc. End user tagging also can’t help users navigate long form content (where lots of things might happen - and be tagworthy - as opposed to a short video clip).
ClickTV does a nice job of integrating tags from multiple sources into their experience, but this doesn’t solve issues of discovering or navigating content not currently tagged. The lack of tagging by end users will be especially noticeable in content that isn’t in the “most popular” lists or content that is very current (news, sports, etc.).
In my experience (at Yahoo! and now Nexidia) tagging is just one way to tackle this issue; there are other methods of deep video search currently available. Broadcast news, for example, is one area in particular where content owners are experimenting with phonetic search to enrich the online media experience.
Posted by: Drew Lanham at September 25, 2006 02:19 PM