Businessweek Archives

Web 2.0: What's in a Number?


?? Measuring Amazon's Not-So-Long Tail |

Main

| First Phase of E-Rate Program Clean-up Nearly Complete ??

August 08, 2005

Web 2.0: What's in a Number?

Rob Hof

Tim Bray, Sun Microsystems' director of Web technologies, hates the term Web 2.0, saying it's vacuous marketing hype. It's true that the term is pretty amorphous, and it has become a catch-all for just about every recent Web technology. But Tim O'Reilly, whose publishing company runs the Web 2.0 conference, makes an impassioned defense that goes beyond mere self-interest. He notes that the term has helped define a new generation of technologies whose social nature differs qualitatively from the broadcast-oriented first generation of Web technologies.

Me, I'd call it the Power of Us, as BW's recent cover story put it. Even though I think it's more descriptive, I realize that doesn't have quite the geeky elegance of Web 2.0, so I suspect mine will remain the minor leagues of memedom.

In any case, Web developer Danny Ayers, in the comments on Tim's post, points to what seems to me the best thoughts about what Web 2.0 really means, from entrepreneur and developer Ian Davis:

Web 2.0 is an attitude not a technology. It?? about enabling and encouraging participation through open applications and services. By open I mean technically open with appropriate APIs but also, more importantly, socially open, with rights granted to use the content in new and exciting contexts. Of course the web has always been about participation, and would be nothing without it. It?? single greatest achievement, the networked hyperlink, encouraged participation from the start. Somehow, through the late nineties, the web lost contact with its roots and selfish interests took hold. This is why I think the Web 2.0 label is cunning: semantically it links us back to that original web and the ideals it championed, but at the same time it implies regeneration with a new version. Technology has moved on and it?? important that the social face of the web keeps pace.

Well said.

07:39 PM

Power of Us, Social Media, Web 2.0

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Web 2.0: What's in a Number?:

?? What?? in a name? Web2.0 from Texas Venture Capital Blog

Sam Ruby detailed the discussion Tim Bray and Tim O??eilly are having regarding the use of the term Web2.0.?Sam indicates, "I’m with Tim O’Reilly in that the term Web 2.0 is as relevant today as the term P2P was in 2001.&n... [Read More]

Tracked on August 8, 2005 10:38 PM

Don’t worry about the name, worry that so many folks have no idea what you are talking about… from Texas Venture Capital Blog

I have been intriqued by all of the back and forth comments regarding what to call the current state of the Internet. For me, Web 2.0 is fine, but for many of you the name is not working. I will give you a hint - no one (not a statisticall... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 10:04 PM

Thinking about this Web 2.0 thing from Thinking about the Future

Web 2.0 is a term that has been growing in popularity for some time, but discussion of it erupted recently when Tim Bray of Sun posted an attack on its use. Tim O'Reilly responded, Tim Bray responded to his [Read More]

Tracked on August 11, 2005 10:09 AM

I definitely agree with Ian that web 2.0 has nothing to do with technology, as most of the technology used is existing stuff. As a company in China in the business of web 2.0-related websites, I often have to explain to my traditional media clients what web 2.0 is and how they can embrace and try to catch up with the web portals as a source of news. This is what I told China Mobile in a recent meeting: In words, web 2.0 does not seem exciting (e.g., blogs) but it's after experiencing it that you know what's special.

Posted by: edwyn chan at August 12, 2005 11:36 AM


Soul Searcher
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

 
blog comments powered by Disqus