Businessweek Archives

Cable Industry Follows Liquor Model To Keep Decency Police at Bay


?? KFC Takes Back Its Middle Name. Can Big Food Make Fat Phat? |

Main

| Levi's 501 Films Make Ads Worth Watching ??

April 29, 2005

Cable Industry Follows Liquor Model To Keep Decency Police at Bay

David Kiley

In a move designed to keep the FCC from applying decency standards to cable TV, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association said its members starting June 1 will better and more frequently display ratings information--larger type size on the TV screen and appearing after every commercial break as well as at the start of the show.

Moreover, cable stations will dedicate $250 million of ad time for public-service-ads under the theme "Take Control. It's Easy." The campaign is meant to encourage parents to use the tech tools available to block inappropriate programming from youthful eyes.

Paging the liquor industry. The cable industry is following the liquor industry model for advertising on TV--infuse ads with alot of cautionary and moderate drinking messages, and run a lot of PSAs about responsible drinking. It's the right strategy. And it's ironic. Cable channels took in over $100 million last year in fresh revenue from liquor companies who are increasingly looking to TV to advertise.

But will it be enough? Morality and decency is a hot-button campaign issue with Republicans, and they are the party in power. Cleaning up cable would be a great achievement to run on for mid-term elections next year. Republican Senator Ted Stevens (Alaska) has already said the industry's response doesn't go far enough. And the FCC may not buy it either. New FCC chairman Kenneth Martin, who favors extending decency standards to cable TV, says, "I think the cable industry needs to do more to address parents?legitimate concerns."

One idea out there is to regulate the cable companies to allow households to pick and choose the stations they want on their subscription. Currently, cable stations are tiered so that people wind up with stations they don't necessarily want when they get the stations they do want. Cable companies don't like it, but it has a lot of traction in Congress to solve the decency issue and be pro-consumer at the same time.

Meantime, I predict that in a few years, ad supported video-on-demand will really take off for edgy programming like The Sopranos and The Shield.

Think of how much advertisers will like that. Instead of flawed Nielsen technology to track ratings, shows that are 100% pay-per-view will deliver 100% accurate ratings info. And if an advertiser makes my viewing of The Shield cost 50-cents instead of $1.99, I'm happy to let a few ads come through. But under that scenario, if I tape the show, and watch it later, can I still TiVo the ad?

ON the other hand...and this is where it could really get good. Imagine if pay-per-view ads were as edgy and creative as many European ads. On pay-per-view, advertisers wouldn't have to soften up and dumb down their ads for the values police. I can envision cool ads targeted to me that I wouldn't want to skip with my TiVo.

04:42 PM

marketing/social policy

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/

Why don't they stop the cable companies from charging us for stations we do not use. I have, supposedly 100 channels. I have my cliker adjusted to the 20 or 22 stations that I actually use.

Posted by: William Wholey at May 2, 2005 03:23 PM

I am just really tired of all the religious quackery channels that end up on my cable line up! I am not paying to hear their garbage and I could honestly care less for such ignorance. If I see that purple haired beast of a woman one more time while I am channel surfing I will scream!

I want the cable service that I am paying for and that is cable that educates and entertains me. I want my pick and choice of the channels that I really want not the garbage that clutters my channel line up.

It amazes me how retarded our Congress and the FCC can be when something that makes sense needs to be implemented.

Posted by: Andres at May 3, 2005 04:26 AM

Not only should we be able to choose what channels we pay for, but we should not have to put up with R and Mature rated commercials on channels such as Nick.jr at 11:00 a.m I'm trying to enjoy Blues Clues with my child and before I realize it we've seen a few seconds of a cable advertisement for another channel and they are showing bits of "Hellraiser" and other R rated films. Television is supposed to be entertainment for everyone, not a source of exasperation. We should be able to choose what we watch at all times since we are paying for the service.

Posted by: Terri at October 21, 2005 12:41 PM


Later, Baby
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

 
blog comments powered by Disqus