Businessweek Archives

Oil: A reader responds


? The debate over oil prices |

Main

| The stolen-election myth ?

November 15, 2004

Oil: A reader responds

Some interesting points from reader Curtis D. Horne, CPL, the head of Houston-based petroleum consultant Curtis D. Horne & Associates. He writes:

"While I would probably agree with Tim Evans' view that oil is unlikely to reach to $100 per barrel, or at least not stay there for very long if it does, I might dispute some of his reasoning.

"As for oil companies finding more oil than they use each year to maintain stock prices, they appear to be doing so if you look at increases in their proven reserves. However, many of those increases are the result of buying production from other companies, or even acquiring the company outright. The increase in proven reserves resulting from new drilling has decreased annually for some time now.

"As for oil companies making money in the 1980s at $12.00 a barrel, I think you will find that that price, when adjusted for inflation, would have to be much higher today.

"The real reason oil prices may not increase much further is the improvement in oil field technology, both in finding potential production through new seismic techniques and producing more and more hydrocarbons from existing reservoirs."

12:48 PM

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/114


Tim Cook's Reboot
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW
 
blog comments powered by Disqus