The Mutual Fund Scandal and You


Here's a news flash for the mutual-fund and hedge-fund industries: Investors may not be entirely up to speed on how your businesses operate (see BW Online, 9/22/03, "A Primer on the Mutual-Fund Scandal"), but they're in no mood to tolerate any hijinks that may cost them money. And they're all for tighter regulations for both types of funds -- and for stiff penalties, including jail time, for fund execs who violate those.

At least, that's the reaction of the 430 readers who took part in our Sept. 19 Reader Survey on this topic.

Some 79% of those who responded said they're somewhat or very familiar with the investigation of New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer into the misdeeds of a handful of mutual funds. Based on what they know of that investigation, some 51% said their opinion of mutual funds as an investment is "much less favorable" than before the scandal broke (though 31% said their opinion is unchanged).

INADEQUATE OVERSIGHT. Some of the latter evidently are cynics, since 80% of those who participated said they think questionable practices at mutual-fund companies are either somewhat or very prevalent, based on what they know of the Spitzer investigation.

Consequently, some 60% of those who participated think regulatory oversight of mutual funds is either somewhat or totally inadequate. And 67% of those who responded think the regulation of hedge funds, some of which may have participated in the shady practices Spitzer is investigating, is somewhat or totally inadequate. That's true even though 35% of those who responded said they aren't familiar at all with what hedge funds do.

Some 82% of those who took the survey characterized as somewhat or very significant the $115 loss Stanford University professor Eric Zitzewitz figures an investor with $10,000 in mutual-fund holdings could have suffered as a result of the shenanigans Spitzer has been uncovering. The same percentage regard as "very significant" the millions in extra income some fund companies may have reaped by cheating.

JAIL TIME, PLEASE. That explains why readers pretty much equally favor every reform that experts have suggested for mutual funds (a bare handful think no changes are needed), and why they're in favor of fines, suspended licenses, executive firings, and jail time for funds and their execs who engage in malfeasance.

Some 93% of the readers who participated said they own mutual funds. And some 84% have more than $10,000 invested in mutual funds -- including 45% who have more than $100,000 invested.

Here are the detailed results of the survey, which as always was unscientific, since anyone who wished to could participate:

Do you own mutual funds?

Option

Total

%

Yes

390

93.08 %

No

23

5.49 %

Don't Know

6

1.43 %

How familiar are you with New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's investigation into mutual fund trading practices?

Option

Total

%

Very familiar

120

28.44 %

Somewhat familiar

213

50.47 %

Not familiar at all

80

18.96 %

Not sure

9

2.13 %

Based on what you know about that investigation, would you say that your opinion of mutual funds as an investment vehicle is now:

Option

Total

%

Unchanged

129

30.79 %

Much more favorable

6

1.43 %

Much less favorable

214

51.07 %

Not sure

70

16.71 %

Based on what you know about Spitzer's investigation, do you think questionable practices at mutual-fund companies are:

Option

Total

%

Very prevalent

116

27.75 %

Somewhat prevalent

221

52.87 %

Not at all prevalent

32

7.66 %

Not sure

49

11.72 %

How much money do you have invested in mutual funds?

Option

Total

%

Less than $10,000

36

8.78 %

$10,001 to $50,000

76

18.54 %

$50,001 to $100,000

83

20.24 %

More than $100,000

183

44.63 %

None

20

4.88 %

Not sure

12

2.93 %

If your fund company is named in the investigation, how likely would you be to consider selling your shares in that company's funds?

Option

Total

%

Very likely

173

41.49 %

Somewhat likely

121

29.02 %

Neither more nor less likely

51

12.23 %

Somewhat unlikely

23

5.52 %

Not likely at all

16

3.84 %

Don't know

33

7.91 %

Would you say that the current degree of regulatory oversight of mutual funds is:

Option

Total

%

Very adequate

12

2.87 %

Somewhat adequate

55

13.16 %

Neither more nor less adequate than for other investments

72

17.22 %

Somewhat inadequate

147

35.17 %

Totally inadequate

105

25.12 %

Not sure

27

6.46 %

Hedge funds may have worked out deals with fund companies allowing them to engage in the types of trading Spitzer has challenged. How familiar are you with hedge funds and how they operate?

Option

Total

%

Very familiar

38

9.11 %

Somewhat familiar

217

52.04 %

Not familiar at all

144

34.53 %

Not sure

18

4.32 %

Based on what you know about hedge funds, would you say the current degree of regulatory oversight of them is:

Option

Total

%

Very adequate

9

2.20 %

Somewhat adequate

16

3.90 %

Neither more nor less adequate than for other investments

17

4.15 %

Somewhat inadequate

92

22.44 %

Totally inadequate

182

44.39 %

Not sure

94

22.93 %

According to Eric Zitzewitz, an assistant professor of economics at Stanford University, an investor with $10,000 in an international fund would have lost an average of $115 in 2001 as a result of the some of the practices Spitzer has uncovered. How significant do you consider such a loss to be?

Option

Total

%

Very significant

191

45.91 %

Somewhat significant

152

36.54 %

Not significant at all

65

15.63 %

Not sure

8

1.92 %

If mutual-fund companies reaped millions or tens of millions in extra income because of the trading practices Spitzer is investigating, how significant would you consider that to be?

Option

Total

%

Very significant

343

82.06 %

Somewhat significant

58

13.88 %

Not significant at all

6

1.44 %

Not sure

11

2.63 %

Of the following remedies for the practices Spitzer is investigating, which would you most favor? (Choose as many as you think would be appropriate):

Option

Total

%

No changes are needed

6

0.41 %

Replace boards at funds that have engaged in questionable practices

245

16.83 %

Require funds to disclose more information about their expenses -- including one of their biggest, the cost of trading

336

23.08 %

Require funds to reduce or eliminate certain extra fees -- such as "marketing charges" -- that they levy on shareholders

244

16.76 %

Reform sales practices, such as one where funds pay brokerage houses extra to push their products

264

18.13 %

Require funds to reveal the performance incentives created by the compensation plans of fund managers

312

21.43 %

Other

49

3.37 %

What types of penalties should regulators levy on fund companies that are found to have engaged in illegal trading practices?

Option

Total

%

Fine such companies

228

23.97 %

Suspend or revoke the registered investment company status of such companies

152

15.98 %

Force fund companies to fire key executives involved in questionable trading schemes

253

26.6 %

Fund executives convicted of illegal practices should be sent to jail

300

31.55 %

Not sure

18

1.89 %


China's Killer Profits
LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW
 
blog comments powered by Disqus