On the domestic front, economists say Germany could revitalize its slowing economy and create jobs by embracing structural reform and liberalizing the labor market. But it's clear Schroder--known as an opportunist and a pragmatist--has no intention of tackling such sensitive issues this side of the 2002 general election. He isn't going to alienate the unions before then.Q: Will Europe in the future be a market open to competition, or will it be managed and socialized, as French Premier Lionel Jospin clearly wants?A: There's no conflict between the social-welfare state and open markets. Germany is very free-trade oriented.
That has nothing to do with the question of offering people security not only in old age, but also in times when they're out of work. A market that's as open as possible is the precondition for a successful economy, and a successful economy is the precondition to being able to pay for social security. Where the limits lie is something that must always be debated, that's clear.Q: You've put through many reforms in the last three years. What do you still want to accomplish and how quickly?A: We made two important strategic decisions: tax reform and the creation of the second pillar in the pension system, based on capital investment. That issue has been neglected for decades in Germany, and we confronted it. Next, we will create a modern immigration law.Q: Do you see any need to make Germany more attractive for foreign investors?A: We were very unattractive. But that has changed because of tax reform. We are seeing significant growth in foreign investment in Germany. We have to better explain the positive side of codetermination [in which shareholders and employees are represented almost equally on companies' supervisory boards]. This [system], especially when a company is in crisis, has an extraordinarily important and stabilizing effect. But it looks different when viewed from outside. The same problem exists when one speaks of labor-market flexibility.Q: How is your relationship with President Bush?A: We have telephoned several times [and] met in March. I found him to be a very open and well-informed person. What I found to be very pleasant is that when there are differences of opinion--for example regarding the Kyoto accord--he speaks about these just as openly as when we agree. The points of agreement are far more numerous than the differences of opinion, by the way.
As far as missile defense is concerned, a very thorough consultation process is underway. The question of feasibility, the question of cost, the question of including partners elsewhere in the world, the question of the effect of this project on arms agreements--all these issues are in discussion. One effect could be that the huge atomic arsenal created in the cold war could be reduced significantly. But it would be premature to make conclusions at this point.Q: The euro is near its lowest point ever. Is there a relationship between the euro and Europe's form of government?A: We made a decision that monetary policy will be made by an independent European Central Bank. Any debate among politicians about monetary policy is counterproductive. When one looks at the prospering European economy, there's really no reason to worry about the stability of the euro. The economic power that stands behind this currency is huge. A common currency imposes on us a duty to cooperate more on policy. Indeed, the creators of the euro envisioned it as an instrument to promote political union. Whatever the details of union may be, there's no doubt we need more policy coordination in Europe.Q: In France and some other countries, there is fear that Germany will dominate Europe.A: Germany is in favor of integration precisely because we don't want dominance. Naturally we are aware of the strength of our economy and naturally we don't want to downplay it. Why should we? We really believe our national interests are identical with European interests. And because that's so, we're fighting for more integration in Europe. No one must fear political dominance.Q: Unemployment has begun to climb again. Does that worry you?A: Any degree of unemployment worries me. It must. Our goal is to reduce the number of unemployed in Germany to 3.5 million [from 3.87 million in April] by the end of the legislative session [in summer 2002]. The prospects to achieve that goal are still good. We want to change the way we help unemployed people find jobs. We want to be faster and more goal oriented.Q: Does that mean you'll put more pressure on unemployed people to find work?A: We want to encourage those who are able to work, no question. To those who say, "We could work, we have the qualifications, but we don't want to,"...we want to say that solidarity isn't a one-way street.Q: How is your relationship with Russian President Putin, and do you believe Russia can be integrated into a security pact with Europe and the U.S.?A: If I correctly understand the goal of American policy, one wishes Russia to be a partner. My impression is that American policy speaks not of antagonism but rather partnership. As far as my relationship with President Putin is concerned, it's fine.