Businessweek Archives

Test Drive: Yes, It Looks Like A Winner

Cover Story


David Cole, general manager of Microsoft Corp.'s Personal Systems Div., likes to show his visitors "horror" videos. A woman sits at a computer in Microsoft's usability lab, trying to start Write, a word-processing program in Windows. After nine agonizing minutes, a Microsoft employee finally steps in and tells her how.

Cole's goal for Windows 95 was to come up with an intuitive approach that even a novice could figure out. And his programmers have succeeded. Windows 95 isn't as elegant as Apple Computer Inc.'s Macintosh OS, and it lacks the crash-proof robustness of IBM's OS/2 and of its own big brother, Windows NT. Many Win95 features are old hat to Mac and OS/2 users.

SINGLE CLICK. Win95 is a quantum leap, however, for people who have struggled through chores such as locating a file or launching a program on Windows 3.1. Win95's "shortcuts," similar to Apple's "aliases," let you drag the icons of frequently used programs directly to the "desktop" screen so they can be launched with a click of the mouse. Win95 also has a button marked "start" in the lower left corner. Click it, and your programs are listed in a series of menus. Click once (a relief for those still trying to master double-clicking) on your choice, and it starts up.

There are tricks from OS/2, such as printing a file by simply dragging it onto a printer icon. Another is using the right mouse button to see a menu of actions relevant to what the cursor is on. And every Windows user will hail the "recycle bin"--the overdue answer to the Mac "trash can" and OS/2's "shredder."

Win95's "plug-and-play" feature could make adding a modem, printer, or network card as easy as it has always been on a Mac. If a device conforms to the standard drawn up by Microsoft, Intel Corp., and others, the system recognizes the device and helps install any support software.

Win95 finally makes multitasking--running more than one program at a time--a reality, not just a theory. To switch among programs, you simply click on one of a string of buttons on the "task bar" at the bottom of the screen. This is possible because Win95 uses memory more efficiently than creaky old MS-DOS.

You'll need plenty of memory, though. For example, one of the biggest potential benefits is Object Linking and Embedding (OLE), which allows you to exchange data among programs--automatically placing a Lotus 1-2-3 chart in a WordPerfect document, for instance. But to take full advantage of OLE, you'll want to go beyond the 4 megabytes minimum of main memory Microsoft suggests--to at least 8 and maybe 16.

POWER PLAY. Which brings us to the cost-benefit analysis. On the plus side, Win95's interface is a clear winner. (One reservation: The Explorer program, which replaces the awful File Manager, is still mysterious.) Another plus: Win95 runs nearly all programs written for MS-DOS and earlier versions of Windows. But the programs won't run better. You'll get a speed boost only with Win95 applications, starting this fall.

How quickly should you jump to Win95? If you buy a PC after August, chances are it will be the only operating system available. I would recommend replacing, rather than upgrading, anything less powerful than a 33-megahertz 486-based PC. To get your high-end 486 ready for Win95, count on spending a few hundred dollars to boost internal memory and maybe $400 for a new gigabyte hard disk. You'll need it for all those zippy programs coming next year.By Stephen H. Wildstrom in Washington

We Almost Lost the Nasdaq

(enter your email)
(enter up to 5 email addresses, separated by commas)

Max 250 characters

blog comments powered by Disqus