Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg News

Wells Fargo Needs to Answer for Bad Home Loans, U.S. Says (1)

May 13, 2014

Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC:US)’s $5 billion payment two years ago in a national mortgage settlement was for loan servicing abuses, and the bank still needs to answer for making bad government-insured loans, a U.S. Justice Department lawyer told a federal appeals court.

The court should reject the bank’s arguments that the national agreement limits new claims, department attorney Lindsey Powell said. Wells Fargo’s attempt to fend off a New York lawsuit alleging reckless loan origination mischaracterizes issues it raises as covered by the national settlement, Powell told a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals today in Washington.

“All of the loans at issue in that case contain material violations” of underwriting standards and other mortgage regulations and are fair game for the government, Powell said.

Douglas Baruch, an attorney for Wells Fargo, disputed Powell’s assertion, arguing that the government’s case relies on compliance reports to federal agencies for which the bank received immunity from further suits.

“They’re seeking to impose liability on Wells Fargo based solely on annual certifications,” Baruch said.

He urged the panel to order U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer, who is overseeing the national settlement, to reconsider her ruling that it doesn’t offer protection against the allegations in the New York case, filed in October 2012.

Harm’s Cause

The judges repeatedly questioned the lawyers in an effort to determine how much harm resulted from misconduct in processing individual loans and how much resulted from reliance on fraudulent Wells Fargo compliance reports, in which the bank told the government it had safeguards in place to properly run a program for Federal Housing Administration-insured loans.

Lawyers for Wells Fargo, the most profitable bank in the U.S. last year, said in court papers that the New York suit was a “brazen attempt” to impose “massive fraud liability” only six months after it agreed to payments in the national accord.

Wells Fargo was one of five banks that agreed in 2012 to the $25 billion nationwide settlement with the Justice Department over mortgage wrongdoing that included botched foreclosures. The FHA then took additional action against four of the banks, including Wells Fargo, for related housing-crisis wrongdoing.

Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. decided to settle those matters. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo chose to fight.

The case in Washington is U.S. v. Bank of America, 13-5112, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Washington).

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Zajac in Washington at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at Charles Carter, Andrew Dunn

blog comments powered by Disqus