Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Bloomberg News

GE Sues National Grid for Payment of Hudson Dredging Costs (2)

April 30, 2013

General Electric Co. sued National Grid Plc (NG/)’s Niagara Mohawk unit in federal court in New York seeking costs associated with the government-ordered environmental cleanup of the Hudson River.

The complaint seeks a declaration that National Grid, owner of Britain’s power-distribution network, is responsible for paying an “equitable share of all future response costs” that Fairfield, Connecticut-based General Electric incurs in connection with the dredging of river sediments to remove polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.

GE has incurred hundreds of millions of dollars in dredging-related costs, including millions that it wouldn’t have spent without the release of contaminated sediment and debris left behind when Niagara Mohawk, or NiMo, removed the Fort Edward Dam in 1973, GE said in its complaint filed April 26 in Albany.

“Plaintiff GE has contacted defendant NiMo regarding its contribution to the presence of hazardous substances at the site and has sought defendant’s cooperation in and contribution to the dredging project,” GE said. “Defendant has failed to cooperate with, pay for, or contribute in any way to the dredging project.”

National Grid, based in London, acquired Niagara Mohawk in January 2002 for $8.9 billion.

GE Singled Out

“We’re going to defend our position, primarily on the basis that we did not put the PCBs in the Hudson,” Steve Brady, a spokesman for National Grid, said today in a phone interview.

“If you go back through time it’s been fairly clear that the EPA singled out GE alone as being responsible for this,” Brady said, referring to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “We didn’t purchase, use or place the PCBs in the Hudson and we really think we need to protect our customers. We think it’s wrong for them to help pay for the remediation.”

Until 1977, GE operated two electrical capacitor manufacturing plants along the Hudson that caused PCBs to enter the river, according to its complaint. When it removed the Fort Edward Dam, Niagra Mohawk removed only about 200 cubic yards of sludge from behind it, leaving more than 1 million cubic yards of silt, sludge and sediment contaminated by PCBs, GE said.

The case is General Electric Co. (GE:US) v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 1:13-cv-00473, U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York (Albany).

To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Dolmetsch in New York at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

blog comments powered by Disqus