Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Companies & Industries

Lululemon Strikes a Familiar Pose: Foot in Mouth

Lululemon Pants Don't Work for Some Women: Founder Play

The workout never seems to end for the Lululemon (LULU) corporate communications team. Just as they finished cleaning up the PR mess that came from its see-through pants kerfuffle and the resignation announcement of their chief executive officer, founder Chip Wilson implied that plus-size people should shop elsewhere.

Feel the burn.

Wilson’s exact words? “Quite frankly, some women’s bodies just actually don’t work. … It’s about the rubbing through the thighs, [and] how much pressure is there.” This was before Wilson said he’s “too wealthy” to take the reins again at the company he founded.

Wilson quickly backtracked when asked if the some women shouldn’t wear the company’s pants. “No, I think they can, I just think it’s how you use them.”

We get it: Lululemon is an aspirational brand for customers. Its products promise to make one’s butt look good, and in doing so, the company may see some reputational downside in having its pants (Groove Pant, $98) on people who frequent fast-food joints more often than yoga class.

Such strategy does have the obvious drawback: 35 percent of U.S. adults are obese. One would think a $10.1 billion company ostensibly devoted to health and fitness could find a way to inspire that market, or at least not insult it outright.

Even if Lululemon is set on ignoring one-third of its potential customers, it would be wise to be quiet about it. We can imagine the corporate communications training now: “Avoid the terms ‘thighs’ and ‘rubbing,’ or any combination thereof. ‘Ebitda’ and ‘namaste’ are fine.”

Stock is an associate editor for Twitter: @kylestock

blog comments powered by Disqus