The threat by a New York regulator to suspend Standard Chartered Plc’s (STAN) banking license is stoking investor and analyst concern the business model that produced eight straight years of record profit is in jeopardy.
New York State’s Department of Financial Services this week said the London-based lender conducted $250 billion of deals with Iranian banks over seven years and processed transactions for institutions subject to U.S. economic sanctions, prompting the watchdog to threaten to withdraw the firm’s license in the state. The shares have slumped 22 percent in London since the Aug. 6 order, erasing 8 billion pounds ($12.5 billion) of market value.
“If a global bank loses its U.S. presence, that’s quite hobbling in terms of conducting international dollar transactions,” said Serena Moe, a former U.S. Treasury Department deputy chief counsel and Citigroup Inc. lawyer who’s now at law firm Wiley Rein LLP in Washington.
Standard Chartered focuses on arranging funding and providing guarantees for clients importing and exporting to Asia, a strategy described by Chief Executive Officer Peter Sands last week as “boring.” While it doesn’t have a U.S. consumer bank, the unit that processes dollar payments for clients with businesses in the U.S. and emerging markets is the seventh largest in the world.
Pretax profit at its U.S., U.K. and European division almost doubled in the first half to about $464 million, about 12 percent of the total.
“The whole business model comes under scrutiny given that Standard Chartered is basically a trading bank in Asia where the bulk of the trade is in U.S. dollars,” said Chirantan Barua, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein Research in London. Barua has had an underperform rating on the stock since at least March, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Standard Chartered yesterday denied the allegations, saying it “strongly rejects the position and portrayal of facts” made by the New York regulator. The lender said 99.9 percent of its transactions with Iran complied with U.S. Treasury regulations, and that the total value of trades that weren’t in compliance was less than $14 million. Tim Baxter, a company spokesman, declined to comment further.
The lender is unlikely to lose its banking license because the regulator’s order focuses on monetary penalties, Cormac Leech, an analyst at London-based Liberum Capital Ltd. who rates the stock a buy, wrote in a note to clients yesterday.
“It’s incredibly difficult to know what kind of impact this is going to have on Standard Chartered’s business,” said James Chappell, an analyst at Germany’s Berenberg Bank. “That uncertainty is why the shares have been hit as much as they have.”
Any limits on Standard Chartered’s U.S. dollar clearing operations would be “negative” for the company’s bond ratings, Moody’s Investors Service said yesterday in a statement.
“This business directly supports its global commercial and trade-finance franchise, and the group places a heavy strategic emphasis on transaction banking and cash-management services,” Moody’s said. The potential for closing of Standard Chartered’s New York branch also may have “broader implications” for the company’s reputation, Moody’s said.
Sands, 50, said he saw “virtue in being boring” as the lender posted an 11 percent increase in net income to $2.86 billion for the first half of 2012. The bank, which generates about 70 percent of its revenue from Asia, has had a U.S. presence since 1902. In 2008, it agreed to acquire an American Express Co. (AXP:US) bank unit for about $860 million, in part to double its business clearing dollar payments for clients.
The unit provided about 1,700 banks in 120 countries with clearing services in U.S. dollars, euros and yen at the time of the purchase. The bank clears about $195 billion a day through its Americas division, according to its website.
“It does business with American banks and used to describe itself as a bankers’ bank, organizing trade finance for Asia, so it will not be good for its global reputation to be seen to be falling out with New York regulators,” said Simon Willis, an analyst at Daniel Stewart Securities Plc (DAN) in London, who rates the bank a buy. “It’s the reputational risk.”
Standard Chartered’s New York operation had $40.8 billion of assets at the end of March, according to the New York regulator. By comparison, the parent had $624 billion in total assets at the end of June.
The New York branch plays a central role in the bank’s interactions with the Federal Reserve, which guards the stability of the U.S. financial system.
As of March 31, the New York branch had $17.7 billion in deposits held at Federal Reserve banks, according to a data filed with the National Information Center, a U.S. data repository. In November 2008, during the credit crisis, Standard Chartered used the New York branch to borrow $2.9 billion through a Fed emergency-lending program, according to a Bloomberg News examination of data obtained from the central bank under a Freedom of Information Act request.
Finance Director Richard Meddings told analysts Aug. 1 that Standard Chartered took pride in being one of the few able to provide non-U.S. clients access to dollar funding throughout the crisis.
Dollar liquidity “has become one of the more sort-of unpredictable and sort-of in-flux variables,” Meddings said. “But we are in a position to take advantage of that, because we are highly liquid in dollars. We have the trade-finance infrastructure, we have the relationships.”
Wire transfers involving Iranian banks are at the heart of Standard Chartered’s alleged misconduct. From 2001 to 2007, the bank executed 60,000 wire transfers involving $250 billion through its New York branch, according to the Department of Financial Services.
At the time, the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control required U.S. banks to identify and filter all dollar-clearing transactions involving financial institutions operating in nations facing U.S. sanctions, including Iran -- even if the transactions were handled by third-party banks. Standard Chartered flouted the rules by removing any reference to the involvement of Iranian banks from wire-transfer orders involving its New York branch, the regulator said.
Standard Chartered “had previously reported that it is conducting a review of its historical compliance and is discussing that review with U.S. enforcement agencies,” the bank said in the statement, referring to the Department of Financial Services, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and New York District Attorney.
The DFS was created in 2011 when Governor Andrew Cuomo merged the state’s banking and insurance departments into a new regulator under Benjamin Lawsky, his former chief of staff. The agency has the power to issue regulations, investigate and fine financial-services firms. It may also probe alleged criminal activity and refer its findings to the state’s attorney general for prosecution.
The lender’s top executives may now come under pressure to resign, according to Christopher Wheeler, a Mediobanca SpA analyst in London.
“This is going to prove rather tricky for the management team at Standard Chartered as they have been at the bank” for years, he said. “This has been happening while Peter Sands, Richard Meddings and Mike Rees have been in place.”
Sands was promoted to CEO in November 2006 after four years as finance director. Meddings, who replaced Sands as finance director, was previously director for governance for Africa, Middle East, Pakistan, Europe and the Americas. Since 2003, Rees has been CEO of global banking and markets, the unit that generates about three-quarters of the lender’s profit.
The bank may be fined $1.5 billion by regulators in the U.S., lose about $1 billion of revenue from its Iranian operation and a further $3 billion in market value if top executives quit, Liberum’s Leech said.
That may prompt Standard Chartered to reach an early settlement and avoid losing its license.
The problem is “what makes the stock go up from here?” Wheeler said in a Bloomberg Television interview after the plunge. “What good news can push the stock up? To get back to where it was last night they need to resolve this issue.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Gavin Finch in London at email@example.com; Howard Mustoe in London at firstname.lastname@example.org; Bradley Keoun in New York at email@example.com.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Edward Evans at firstname.lastname@example.org