Already a Bloomberg.com user?
Sign in with the same account.
Job seekers wait to speak to recruiters at the "Putting America Back To Work!" job fair in New York. Photographer: Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg
June’s payroll count probably rounded out the weakest quarter for U.S. employment in more than two years, economists said before a government report today.
Employers increased staffing by 100,000 workers last month after adding 69,000 in May, the least in a year, according to the median forecast of 84 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. Company headcounts excluding government agencies may have climbed by 106,000, concluding the smallest quarterly advance since the first three months of 2010.
The estimates, albeit improvements from May, offer further evidence that hiring has shifted into a lower gear, restricting consumers’ ability to boost spending. The report may also show the jobless rate held at 8.2 percent last month, underscoring concern by some Federal Reserve policy makers that the economy isn’t growing enough to reduce unemployment.
“The labor market is struggling but healing,” said Bill Cheney, chief economist at John Hancock Financial Services Inc. in Boston. “Until we start getting job creation reliably in the 250,000 range, I will still feel like the labor market is fragile.”
The Labor Department will release the employment report at 8:30 a.m. in Washington. Forecasts for total payroll growth ranged from increases of 35,000 to 165,000.
Estimates for the unemployment rate, derived from a separate Labor Department survey of households, ranged from 8.1 percent to 8.3 percent. Joblessness has exceeded 8 percent since February 2009, the longest stretch in monthly records dating to 1948.
“What we are seeing today from an income perspective is our economy is modestly adding jobs,” Robert Hull, chief financial officer at Lowe’s Cos., the second-largest U.S. home- improvement retailer, said at a June 26 consumer conference in Boston. “That’s the good news. The bad news is it’s not sufficient to have a material impact on the unemployment rate.”
The economic and jobs outlook will probably play a major role in President Barack Obama’s bid for re-election. Obama ascribed labor market weakness in May primarily to an inadequate response by European governments to the continent’s debt crisis, saying “our biggest challenge is not here in the U.S. but the economy overseas.” Republican candidate Mitt Romney said Obama “is always quick to find someone to blame” for the weak economy.
The slowdown in both economic and employment growth prompted the Fed to take additional steps to stimulate the expansion last month. Officials said on June 20 they would buy securities to extend the maturities of assets on the bank’s balance sheet, thereby holding down longer-term interest rates.
The central bankers also lifted forecasts for joblessness, saying they anticipate the unemployment rate will average 8 percent to 8.2 percent in the fourth quarter of this year versus an April estimate of 7.8 percent to 8 percent.
“After a brighter start to the year, economic momentum has slowed in the last few months,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William C. Dudley said during a June 29 speech.
Repeating language the policy makers used when announcing the new measures, Dudley said the Fed is “prepared to take further action as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions.” The crisis in Europe and uncertainty over U.S. fiscal policy remain potential hurdles for business investment, he said.
Investors last month took heart that some progress was being made across the Atlantic. Stocks surged on June 29, capping the biggest June gain since 1999, after European leaders reached an agreement that alleviated concern banks will fail. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) climbed 4 percent last month.
At the same time, uncertainty about the government’s fiscal outlook may still be hampering hiring plans. Congress has yet to resolve the so-called fiscal cliff, which represents more than $600 billion in higher taxes and reductions in defense spending and other government programs in 2013 that will take place without action.
Bloomberg Survey
================================================================
Nonfarm Private Manu Unemploy
Payrolls Payrolls Payrolls Rate
,000’s ,000’s ,000’s %
================================================================
Date of Release 07/06 07/06 07/06 07/06
Observation Period June June June June
----------------------------------------------------------------
Median 100 106 8 8.2%
Average 97 109 8 8.2%
High Forecast 165 175 17 8.3%
Low Forecast 35 45 -3 8.1%
Number of Participants 84 43 21 80
Previous 69 82 12 8.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------
4CAST 80 95 --- 8.3%
ABN Amro 90 100 --- 8.2%
Action Economics 100 105 5 8.2%
Aletti Gestielle 115 --- --- 8.2%
Ameriprise Financial 80 87 4 8.2%
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi 120 130 --- 8.2%
Bantleon Bank AG 90 --- --- 8.2%
Barclays 75 85 --- 8.2%
Bayerische Landesbank 125 --- --- 8.1%
BBVA 90 100 8 8.2%
BMO Capital Markets 80 --- --- 8.2%
BNP Paribas 85 --- --- 8.2%
BofA Merrill Lynch 100 110 --- 8.2%
Briefing.com 100 110 --- 8.1%
Capital Economics 125 --- --- 8.1%
CIBC World Markets 110 --- --- 8.2%
Citi 110 120 15 8.2%
ClearView Economics 90 100 0 8.3%
Comerica 110 --- --- 8.2%
Commerzbank AG 80 --- --- 8.2%
Credit Agricole CIB 100 --- --- 8.2%
Credit Suisse 100 110 --- 8.2%
Daiwa Securities America 135 --- --- 8.2%
Danske Bank 80 90 --- 8.2%
DekaBank 95 --- --- 8.2%
Desjardins Group 85 --- --- 8.2%
Deutsche Bank Securities 75 90 --- 8.2%
Deutsche Postbank AG 80 --- --- 8.2%
Exane 60 --- --- 8.2%
First Trust Advisors 120 130 4 8.2%
FTN Financial 80 90 --- 8.2%
Goldman, Sachs & Co. 125 --- --- 8.2%
Helaba 100 --- --- 8.2%
High Frequency Economics 150 --- --- 8.2%
HSBC Markets 115 127 7 8.2%
Hugh Johnson Advisors 88 106 10 8.2%
IDEAglobal 115 130 15 8.2%
IHS Global Insight 75 --- --- 8.2%
Informa Global Markets 65 --- -3 8.2%
ING Financial Markets 125 140 10 8.2%
Insight Economics 100 --- --- 8.2%
Intesa Sanpaulo 90 --- --- 8.2%
Iur Capital 45 --- --- 8.2%
J.P. Morgan Chase 85 --- --- 8.3%
Janney Montgomery Scott 70 85 8 8.2%
Jefferies & Co. 95 99 15 8.2%
JH Cohn 50 --- --- ---
John Hancock Financial 127 --- --- 8.2%
Landesbank Berlin 50 --- --- 8.1%
Landesbank BW 100 --- --- 8.2%
LCA Consultores 140 --- --- ---
Maria Fiorini Ramirez 85 95 --- ---
Market Securities 102 --- --- 8.2%
MET Capital Advisors 72 --- --- 8.2%
Modal Asset --- 132 --- ---
Moody’s Analytics 125 130 10 8.2%
Morgan Stanley & Co. 110 120 15 8.2%
National Bank Financial 80 --- --- 8.2%
Natixis 85 --- --- 8.2%
Nomura Securities 80 90 5 8.2%
Nord/LB 100 --- 10 8.2%
OSK Group/DMG 90 --- --- 8.2%
Paragon Research 110 --- --- 8.2%
Pierpont Securities 110 125 --- 8.2%
PineBridge Investments 115 --- --- 8.2%
PNC Bank 135 145 5 8.2%
Prestige Economics 35 45 --- 8.1%
Raiffeisenbank International 140 150 --- 8.2%
Raymond James 100 115 --- 8.2%
RBC Capital Markets 75 85 --- 8.2%
RBS Securities 110 120 --- 8.2%
Renaissance Macro Research 105 115 --- 8.2%
Scotiabank 75 --- --- 8.2%
SMBC Nikko Securities 100 100 --- 8.2%
Societe Generale 80 90 --- 8.1%
Southern Polytechnic State 120 --- --- ---
Standard Chartered 85 95 --- 8.2%
Stone & McCarthy Research 165 175 17 8.1%
TD Securities 100 110 0 8.3%
UBS 85 100 --- 8.2%
UniCredit Research 100 --- --- 8.2%
University of Maryland 81 89 5 8.3%
Wells Fargo & Co. 106 --- --- 8.3%
Westpac Banking Co. 130 --- --- 8.2%
Wrightson ICAP 100 110 --- 8.2%
================================================================
To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Kowalski in Washington at akowalski13@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net