(Updates with excerpt from filing in third paragraph.)
Jan. 27 (Bloomberg) -- The New York Mets’ owners asked a judge to dismiss $386 million in remaining claims brought by the trustee liquidating Bernard Madoff’s firm, saying their “early faith” in Madoff was well-founded because of his reputation.
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff threw out most of trustee Irving Picard’s $1 billion in claims against the team owners. The judge said Picard must prove they were willfully blind to the convicted Ponzi schemer’s crimes if he wants to recoup money they withdrew from their Madoff accounts, the Mets owners said. Picard hasn’t proved that, and so has no case against them, they said.
“Defendants trusted their broker, Bernard L. Madoff, and never suspected him of any fraud, let alone a Ponzi scheme,” team owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz said in a court filing yesterday. Picard can’t show they believed there was “a high probability” that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme or that they took “deliberate action” to avoid seeing what was going on, they said.
The Mets owners, after losing money in the Ponzi scheme and an income stream from Madoff, have said they are trying to sell stakes in the Major League Baseball team. Picard’s claims remain a threat to their finances.
Supporting their request, Wilpon and Katz attached testimony from Arthur Friedman, a partner in their company, Sterling Equities, who handled their investments with the Madoff firm, depositing checks, making withdrawals and trying to duplicate Madoff’s investment strategy.
Under 17 hours of questioning by Picard, Friedman testified that he made, on paper, less than half of Madoff’s reported profits, though he was satisfied the strategy worked.
Friedman told Picard that he couldn’t spell the word “Ponzi” when he looked into buying insurance against investment fraud. Friedman said he never bought the insurance and was comfortable with the way Madoff did business. He said he “understood” that Madoff was on a “short list” to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Separately, Picard yesterday asked Rakoff to rule on part of his remaining claims.
Picard, a partner at law firm Baker & Hostetler LLP in New York, originally demanded $300 million in profit and $700 million in principal from Wilpon, Katz and a group of family members and related entities, saying they turned a blind eye to Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. The partners denied the allegation.
In September, Rakoff dismissed all or part of nine of 11 claims in Picard’s suit against Wilpon and Katz. He has set a March trial for the rest of the claims.
Refusing to let Picard appeal his decisions this month, Rakoff, a fan of the New York Yankees, cited a quotation usually attributed to that team’s Hall of Fame catcher, Yogi Berra.
“Whether on the ball field or in court, ‘It ain’t over till it’s over’ is both shrewd observation and sound advice,” the judge said.
The case is Picard v. Katz, 11-cv-03605, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
--With assistance from Bob Van Voris in New York. Editors: Andrew Dunn, Stephen Farr
To contact the reporter on this story: Linda Sandler in New York at firstname.lastname@example.org.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Pickering at email@example.com