(Updates with Israel comment starting in fifth paragraph.)
Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are poised for a collision next week of their bids to extend or expand a payroll tax cut for workers.
House Republicans rallied yesterday behind a plan Boehner is preparing that would pair an extension of the current payroll tax cut with eased restrictions on some industrial emissions and expedited approval of an oil pipeline from Canada. Reid is focused on expanding cuts to the worker payroll tax and using a surtax on annual income exceeding $1 million to pay for it.
Both leaders agree on extending the Social Security payroll tax cut in some manner, addressing expanded unemployment benefits that will lapse at the end of the year, preventing cuts to physician reimbursements by Medicare and approving some spending reductions. Their differences over how to pay for a comprehensive package, along with some of their priorities, present procedural hurdles -- such as the need for 60 votes to avoid a filibuster -- that are tough to clear, said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, a North Dakota Democrat.
“At this moment, I don’t see the formula that gets 60 votes,” he said. “I’m still hopeful that we will.”
Representative Steve Israel of New York, the head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said the Republican approach will help Democrats politically.
“The more they pursue this extremist agenda and try and hurt the pocketbooks of the middle class in order to reward their special-interest friends, the more Republican seats will be in play,” Israel said yesterday in an interview taped for broadcast this weekend on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt.”
The House and the Senate won’t hold votes today and most lawmakers are returning to their districts for the weekend. Unless they address the payroll tax cut by Dec. 31, workers will get 2 percent less in their paychecks starting in January.
That’s a result that both parties want to avoid, said Senator Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut independent.
“It’s a classic moment of this session of Congress, which is that both parties are for something and we can’t figure out how to get it done,” he said.
The biggest fights likely will center on a Republican demand that the bill include language that would expedite the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline in Canada. The proposed TransCanada Corp. pipeline would carry oil from Canada to the U.S. The Obama administration has put off a decision on the pipeline until 2013.
President Barack Obama has said that he will reject efforts to tie approval of the pipeline to extension of a payroll tax cut. Boehner said the issue should be addressed in the package because development of the pipeline will create jobs.
‘The Keystone pipeline project would create tens of thousands of jobs immediately,’’ said Boehner, an Ohio Republican. “At a time when the American people are still asking the question ‘Where are the jobs?,’ this is a bipartisan proposal that the president ought to endorse.”
Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican, urged Obama not to use his veto authority on the pipeline issue.
“Mr. President, we will have some of your ideas in the bill, maybe it’s time for you to try some of ours,” he told reporters after the Republican meeting.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California said Republicans were “injecting poison pills” into the legislation, knowing that Obama wouldn’t sign it into law with those provisions.
While both parties are interested in continuing expanded unemployment benefits beyond their scheduled expiration at the end of the year, they are divided over the details. Over time, Republicans want to scale back how long the unemployed can claim compensation from 99 weeks to 79 weeks and eventually 59 weeks, said Representative Pat Tiberi, an Ohio Republican.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican, said yesterday that Republican leaders are still talking to members about unemployment benefits “to try to find a policy that everyone can agree on.”
Pelosi said reducing the benefits to 59 weeks would be “problematic” for her caucus.
The Republican bill also would overturn an Obama administration rule that bars states from conducting drug tests for recipients of unemployment compensation and would include income-based eligibility for food stamps, according to Representative Aaron Schock, an Illinois Republican.
Another area of potential agreement is a provision that allows the complete write-off of capital investments that Representative Charles Boustany, a Louisiana Republican, said would be included in the Republican measure. Unless Congress acts, the ability for full write-offs expires Dec. 31, and in 2012 companies could receive only 50 percent bonus depreciation.
Representative Sander Levin of Michigan, the top Democrat on the Ways and Means panel, said he could support that provision.
Both parties have expressed interest in avoiding reductions in reimbursements by Medicare that are due to begin Jan. 1. The Republican bill would prevent the cuts for two years and provide physicians with reimbursements that would be 1 percent larger than they were this year, according to Representative Phil Gingrey, a Georgia Republican who is a physician. That would cost $39 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Gingrey said Camp promised to consider longer-term fixes to the Medicare reimbursement system next year. Camp’s pledge persuaded Gingrey to back the package, Gingrey said.
Republicans will find savings, according to Gingrey, by expanding the pool of higher-income Medicare beneficiaries who would be required to pay larger premiums for Part B physician care. The plan includes income-based eligibility for the drug benefit program under Medicare Part D.
Upper-income senior citizens would pay “closer to the true cost” of the programs, Gingrey said.
The Senate yesterday blocked separate Democratic and Republican bills that would have extended or expanded the payroll tax next year. The Democratic measure, which failed to advance in a 50-48 vote, would have reduced the payroll tax to 3.1 percent next year for employees. The Republican bill, which stalled in a 22-76 vote, would have extended the payroll tax at the current 4.2 percent rate for one year.
Both bills needed 60 votes to advance. After the votes, Reid said the Republican proposal being drafted in the House wouldn’t succeed in his chamber.
“House Republicans’ bill is a partisan joke that has no chance of passing the Senate,” the Nevada Democrat said in a press release. “Instead of playing political games, Congress should work to find common ground.”
The House could vote on the Republican plan as soon as Dec. 13, Gingrey said. Its work won’t likely be completed if Democrats in the Senate block the measure, setting up possible back-and-forth maneuvering between the chambers next week.
Boehner “put enough red meat for their Tea Party folks to get it done,” said Representative Henry Cuellar, a Texas Democrat. “But on the way back, he’s going to lose a lot of those folks because they’re going to strip out things and then it’s up to the Democrats to come in and help it out.”
--With assistance from Kathleen Hunter, Alex Wayne, James Rowley and Heidi Przybyla in Washington. Editors: Jodi Schneider, Leslie Hoffecker
To contact the reporters on this story: Steven Sloan in Washington at email@example.com; Richard Rubin in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at email@example.com