Already a Bloomberg.com user?
Sign in with the same account.
(Updates with comment from seventh paragraph.)
Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Developing nations led by China and India pledged they’d work toward an agreement that would limit their fossil fuel emissions for the first time, the biggest advance in the fight against global warming in 14 years.
Envoys from more than 190 nations also extended the Kyoto Protocol, the only ratified treaty limiting greenhouse gases. They will develop document with “legal force” by 2015 that would curb pollution for all nations, according to a text adopted today in Durban, South Africa.
The move breaks a division enshrined in the United Nations- led discussions since 1992 that allowed the poorest nations to ng industrial nations to clean up the atmosphere. That rift prescape commitments on burning coal and oil while requirievented the U.S. from ratifying Kyoto, which is the heart of the international effort to protect the environment.
“Historic is the word,” Grenadian ambassador Dessima Williams, lead negotiator for a coalition of 42 island nations, said in an interview. “The idea that we got everybody to agree to take some form of legal commitment is a major outcome.”
The talks dragged more than 28 hours past their scheduled Dec. 9 finish as a division emerged between a coalition of more than 120 nations backing a road map to a legally-binding deal and China and India, which sought weaker language on the eventual legal form of the pact. It was the longest meeting since the climate talks began in 1992.
Delegates slept in the corridors as the talks teetered on the brink of collapse after the European Union, 42 island nations and 48 of the poorest states said they couldn’t accept a watered-down deal. India refused to sign an agreement that would bind it to an unwritten treaty and threaten its economy.
“India will never be intimidated by threats,” India’s Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan said in a passionate speech to delegates this morning. “How do I give a blank check and give a legally-binding agreement to sign away the rights of 1.2 billion people?”
The dispute exploded at a 3 a.m. and was defused when the EU agreed to substitute language calling for a treaty with “legal force” instead of a “legal instrument.” The latter construction echoed the 1995 Berlin Mandate that set the course for delegates adopting Kyoto two years later.
“This is a breakthrough decision,” said Tomasz Chruszczow, the envoy from Poland, which holds the rotating presidency of the European Union. “Efforts to fight climate change will be made by all countries, not only the EU. This won’t happen right now, but a process has been started.”
The U.S. initially suggested the “legal instrument” words and backed the compromise, saying it was important to keep the package of Durban measures on track. Environmental groups said the words may let nations wiggle out of commitments.
“This weak compromise is a victory for the fossil industry, which is successfully controlling the U.S. government not agreeing to a legally binding protocol,” said Martin Kaiser, who analysis international climate policy for Greenpeace.
Delegates who were mainly national environment ministers agreed to work toward bringing the next treaty into effect from 2020. That proposal allowed the EU almost alone to say it would make further commitments under Kyoto.
Boost for CDM
Extending Kyoto supports the Clean Development Mechanism, a pillar of the global carbon market that came out of the treaty. Prices of CDM certificates issued have fallen 54 percent in the past year as the weaker economy cut demand for the offsets and concern mounted about the continuation of the program.
Diplomats scaled back ambitions for this year’s meeting and didn’t fix new commitments for doubling pledges to curtail greenhouse gases by 2020, a measure the UN Environment Program says is needed to keep global warming from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) since industrialization. That infuriated the blocs of Latin American and island nations.
“We all know this is a very bad agreement that will need more work,” Claudia Salerno, the Venezuelan envoy who helped derail a decision at the talks in Copenhagen two years ago, said during the debate last night. “We need to stop this farce of lack of shame.”
Emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels hit a record last year, and 2011 is on track to be the 11th warmest ever. Glaciers are retreating from Tibet to the Alps and Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, and sea levels are rising, causing concern among island nations at risk of disappearing.
“The ambition of the package is extremely low,” Nicaraguan minister Paul Oquist Kelley said in an interview. “It says this is a critical problem that’s time urgent, so let’s do something about it in 10 years. You have low ambition, low urgency. We’re ignoring what’s happening before our eyes.”
The meeting also:
--Adopted an instrument governing a “Green Climate Fund,” which is aimed at helping channel as much as $100 billion a year in aid by 2020 to developing nations. The text didn’t answer exactly where the money will come from or when.
--Agreed measures on protecting forests, inviting nations by March 5 to submit views on how to finance those programs.
--Developed an “Adaptation Committee” that will help developing nations cope with the impact of climate change. It set out where its directors will come from.
--Suggested ways to streamline technology transfer to developing nations and ways to build the skills and capacity for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in those countries.
--Established guidelines and procedures for nations reporting their greenhouse gas emissions to the UN.
The most contentious political issue was extending the Kyoto agreement, which required industrial nations to cut fossil fuel emissions 5 percent from 1990 levels through 2012. Canada, Russia and Japan ruled out signing up to new commitments. The pact will cover about 15 percent of global emissions.
This year’s meeting sets out a plan for the envoys to adopt a new treaty limiting fossil fuel emissions for all nations, requiring developing nations to take on the same sort of restrictions the European Union has adopted with Kyoto. The 27- nation bloc that did the most to limit carbon dioxide since Kyoto was agreed in 1997, demanded in exchange for extending the protocol that all nations make a political statement indicating when they’d join in reductions.
That required China and India to drop their resistance to taking on the sorts of targets, a victory for the U.S. which has pressed for the shift for more than a decade. Republicans in Washington have stalled President Barack Obama’s climate legislation noting that China and India have become two of the three biggest polluters since Kyoto was agreed.
“This is a significant package, I think a very significant package,” Todd Stern, the lead U.S. envoy at the talks, said during the debate last night.
--With assistance from Andres R. Martinez and Ewa Krukowska in Durban, South Africa. Editor: Reed Landberg
To contact the reporters on this story: Kim Chipman in Durban, South Africa at firstname.lastname@example.org; Alex Morales in Durban, South Africa at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reed Landberg at firstname.lastname@example.org