Already a Bloomberg.com user?
Sign in with the same account.
Kelly Services Inc
General Motors Co
United States Steel Corp
Noelle Stary’s three-year-old marketing consultancy will see revenue of nearly $100,000 this year, yet she’s worried about the company’s survival. Stary works from a shared office in central New Jersey where she faces typical startup hurdles such as tightfisted bankers and slow-paying customers. A bigger problem, though, is that she can’t take advantage of tax incentives and labor laws that benefit larger businesses. “Every new step of growth is almost always more complicated than the step before,” says Stary, 29, a former manager at a small ad agency in Manhattan.
Stary is one of over 40 million self-employed in the U.S.—31 percent of the labor force—who form an increasingly important part of the economy. The Great Recession accelerated the trend. In December, an American Staffing Assn. survey of 10,000 employers showed the number of temporary workers assigned to companies by agencies such as Manpower (MAN) and Kelly Services (KELYA) has jumped 19 percent over the past year. By 2019 the self-employed will account for 40 percent of all American workers, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The growth of these freelancers’ businesses is stymied by our tax and labor codes. The American employment-based benefits system dates to World War II, when wage freezes made it hard for large companies to attract quality workers. To keep employees, especially skilled men, corporations such as General Motors (GM) and U.S. Steel (X) began to subsidize health-care coverage, retirement plans, and vacations—a strategy that grew after the war as unions locked in benefits with long-term contracts. This system served U.S. workers well until the 1980s, when globalization started to make large employers less dependent on full-time domestic employees.
Today, the fast-growing freelance workforce is shouldering costs and risks formerly borne by companies. The self-employed can’t get unemployment insurance or file for workman’s compensation, and they aren’t covered by most federal or state employee labor laws, leaving them little recourse beyond spending precious time and money in small claims court if they aren’t paid.
Worse, the self-employed are taxed as if they’re medium-size employers, but they can’t deduct health insurance premiums and other expenses that bigger companies can. Consultants on average earn about a third less than people in similar jobs at companies, according to the IRS, but they pay both the employer and employee shares of Social Security and Medicare—a total of 15 percent of their income. And about three-quarters of self-employed Americans work in cities that tax unincorporated businesses at an average rate of 4 percent of profits.
Health-care coverage may be the biggest roadblock. For years most freelancers were locked out because they couldn’t afford the high premiums. Now, despite its promise, the health reform law isn’t improving access to care for all Americans. Millions like Stary—who says her health-care strategy is “hoping for a year of good health”—will only have the option of paying into a health-care savings plan. Such a plan means little if the cost of care exceeds the new law’s payout ceiling of $6,000 for individuals or $11,000 for families. Stary, like most freelancers, still can’t afford health insurance.
Congress should reenact the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010. This piece of the stimulus, which expired at the end of last year, allowed freelancers to fully deduct their health premiums before assessing Social Security and Medicare tax. Then let’s amend federal labor law to cover the nonpayment of consultants so they have recourse through the Labor Dept. rather than suing in small claims court. This would level the field because it would shift the burden of proof from the freelancer to the company charged with nonpayment. And let’s encourage cities to rethink that unincorporated business tax for freelancers, at least when they’re just getting started.
Stary and the millions of self-employed shouldn’t have to struggle so hard. As these individuals represent the single greatest source of job creation today—and likely in the coming decades—supporting them will only strengthen the recovery. Easing their burdens might just help them make the leap from struggling solo businesses to healthy small employers, creating even more jobs.