Brad Trent
America is approaching 2008 with trepidation. The health of the economy is a top concern, and that uncertainty will color the outcome of the Presidential election. To find out what some smart financial minds see ahead, I talked with former General and Presidential candidate Wesley K. Clark, now chairman of New York investment bank Rodman & Renshaw (RODM); Christopher J. Ailman, chief investment officer of CalSTRS, the California teachers' pension fund that manages about $175 billion; Russell Read, the chief investment officer of CalPERS, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, which has more than $250 billion in assets; and Richard Bernstein, chief investment strategist for Merrill Lynch (MER). No one predicted a disaster in the offing, but no one said it would be pretty, either.
What will be the most important issues for America in 2008? What will people be talking about?
I think they're going to be talking about the economy because it seems pretty clear we haven't yet reached a resolution of the subprime mortgage issues. We're limping along right now as bankers and others try to understand the dimensions of the crisis in their own institutions and what its second and third order of effects are. Of course, we want to help moderate and low-income families who've been caught up in adjustable-rate mortgages and may not be able to handle upward adjustment in the rates. But we also want to help the financial community work through the issues associated with assessing the risks, finding the bottom, and then making the right adjustments to get the credit markets moving again. That's the number one order of business.
Can you handicap the election?
I think that Iraq as a prominent issue is going to decline. There is a chance always that there'll be some kind of national security challenge, and if there is, that would obviously activate the Republican base. I'm supporting Hillary Clinton. I believe she'll be the Democratic candidate. [Among Republicans, Mike] Huckabee is leading, but John McCain is coming on strong, and I've always felt that Senator McCain was likely to emerge as the Republican candidate. If it's a Clinton/McCain match-up, it'll be a very tough election.
How are you feeling about the year ahead?
Not as pessimistic as the general news media, though I think we're probably now at the darkest point of the tunnel. From here on out we actually start to digest the bad news and at least see a little light. I'd almost divide the year into thirds. The first third is going to be pretty slow. Not a recession, but slow. Second third should be nice and robust, and we can make some money. Then we get into the heated part of the Presidential election cycle, and I think the Street will have to digest a lot of information given the change in leadership.
How will that change in leadership affect the market?
The market will look ahead and try and figure out which industries will do better, which won't, depending on the leadership in the White House. That makes for more of a muddled market in the end of '08 than a raging bull market.
So if the Dems win, how does that affect your strategy?
We probably wouldn't tilt the portfolio, but it would help me make decisions about whether to overweight international stocks vs. the U.S. I'm hearing a lot of people debate whether to overweight the U.S.—CalPERS just decided to equally balance U.S. and international stocks in its portfolio for the first time. I'm not going to base my decision on whether Democrats or Republicans win the White House. What I am going to base it on is which Administration has prospects for improving some of the infrastructure in our country. Not only physical but also intellectual infrastructure. What are we doing about education? Things like that. Because that will tell you how competitive the U.S.