|
|
|
ONLINE FEATURES
Book Reviews
BW Video
Columnists
Interactive Gallery
Newsletters
Past Covers
Philanthropy
Podcasts
Special Reports
BLOGS
Auto Beat
Bangalore Tigers
Blogspotting
Brand New Day
Byte of the Apple
Economics Unbound
Eye on Asia
Fine On Media
Green Biz
Hot Property
Investing Insights
Management IQ
NEXT: Innovation
NussbaumOnDesign
Tech Beat
Working Parents
TECHNOLOGY
J.D. Power Ratings
Product Reviews
Tech Stats
Wildstrom: Tech Maven
AUTOS
Home Page
Auto Reviews
Classic Cars
Car Care & Safety
Hybrids
INNOVATION
& DESIGN Home Page Architecture Brand Equity Auto Design Game Room SMALLBIZ Smart Answers Success Stories Today's Tip INVESTING Investing: Europe Annual Reports BW 50 S&P Picks & Pans Stock Screeners Free S&P Stock Report SCOREBOARDS Hot Growth 100 Mutual Funds Info Tech 100 S&P 500 B-SCHOOLS Undergrad Programs MBA Blogs MBA Profiles MBA Rankings Who's Hiring Grads |
DECEMBER 26, 2005
Oxford: A Winner -- Or An Also Ran? Your lengthy examination of Oxford University ("Shaking Up Oxford," European Edition Cover Story and European Business, Asian Edition, Dec. 5) gets on to shaky ground in places. Certainly the description of Oxford as being in "genteel decline" is belied by the facts. No visitor to Oxford can be unaware of the scale of the university's continuing expansion. New facilities will help to support a rapidly growing externally funded research portfolio (which currently contains more than 2,500 active projects) and a staff and student population from more than 100 different nations. One major project concerns the re-housing of Oxford's unique library and book resources. Your claim that "opposition is brewing" to this project is simply not the case. Congregation, the university's parliament, recently approved major proposals to build a new book depository, and plans are now being finalized for the $46.9 million state-of-the-art facility David Holmes Registrar University Offices Oxford, England This article fails to recognize one of the crucial reasons that American universities have done so well: their openness to foreign scholars. At Harvard University, the unwritten rule underlying tenure is that if there is anyone anywhere in the world who is better than the person under consideration (and willing to move to Harvard), tenure should be denied. Openness is behind the success of universities in California and elsewhere in the international rankings. Not till British universities make a fundamental shift in the way they recruit overseas faculty will they reach the U.S. level. Furthermore, your table of endowments is misleading. Both the University of California at Berkeley and Stanford University have endowments smaller than Oxford's, yet these two institutions are better respected than Oxford in sciences and technology. Dhiraj K. Pradhan University of Bristol Bristol, England How Taiwan Can Protect The Interest Of Its Islanders In Matt Kovac's "Why Taiwan's voters are fed up with Chen" (Global Outlook, Dec. 5), there are two points that need to be clarified: First, Taiwan's China-bound investment policy that has been in effect since November, 2001, has been "proactive liberalization with effective management." The point is to coordinate relaxation measures with systematic assessments to enhance the security of Taiwan's overall economy. Second, in a recent Mainland Affairs Council survey, more than 85% of respondents said the first priority of exchanges between any Taiwanese political party and China is that the exchanges be in Taiwan's overall interests. Both Taiwan and China share the responsibility for improving ties between their two countries. China insists on unifying Taiwan under the "one country, two systems" formula, and it kept World Health Organization experts from visiting Taiwan during the SARS period. The ruling party in Taiwan must protect the interests of 23 million people. Larry Hsieh Deputy Director Kwang Hwa Information & Culture Center Hong Kong | |