Click Here to Go Directly to the Story

 
 


U.S. EDITION
Full Table of Contents
Cover Story
BusinessWeek Investor -- Excellence in Fund Management
Special Report
Up Front
Editor's Memo
Readers Report
Corrections & Clarifications
Books
Technology & You
Economic Viewpoint



Industry Insider
Business Outlook
In Business This Week
Washington Outlook
International Business
Finance
Industrial Management
Sports Business
Media
Legal Affairs
The Corporation
Science & Technology
Developments to Watch
Information Technology
Dividends
The Barker Portfolio
Inside Wall Street
Figures of the Week
Editorials


INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS
International -- Readers Report
International -- Asian Business
International -- European Business
International -- Int'l Figures of the Week




MARCH 24, 2003

EDITOR'S MEMO

Skimming the Crème de la Crème

 
  STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story

When BusinessWeek started its Mutual Fund Scoreboard in 1986, we put about 400 funds through the wringer -- and only 29 received our highest rating for superior risk-adjusted total return. Earlier this year, we applied that same tough standard to a far larger universe of funds and came up with 172 equity and 102 bond funds worthy of our A rating. But even if a would-be investor focused only on those that are top-rated, that's still lots to sift through.


That's why we turned to the Global Fund Research unit at Standard & Poor's, a sister unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies. Together, we tackled the task of winnowing down that list of hundreds of top-performing funds to a handful with truly superior managers. We did it -- and awarded the managers of 10 funds the first annual Standard & Poor's/BusinessWeek Excellence in Fund Management Award.

This is a fitting time to launch these awards. We base our ratings on five-year performance, and the past five years certainly have been extraordinary -- both on the upside and downside. Managers earning an award now have had to prove their mettle through especially turbulent times.

In choosing these premier managers, we kept you, our readers, in mind. We screened out funds that were closed to new investors and ruled out those with onerous expenses. To assure comparability, we also insisted that the lead managers have been on the job for all five years.

Such restrictions cut the list to 40. Then s&p analysts Phil Edwards, Gary Arne, and Rosanne Pane, went beyond what quantitative ratings can do: They pored over fund records, interviewed portfolio managers, and debated the merits of the candidates. By that rigorous process, we selected just 10.

Some managers will be familiar to BusinessWeek readers. Others have created top-notch funds in relative obscurity. Markets and Investment Editor Mara Der Hovanesian and Personal Finance Editor Lewis Braham profile the best of the best. You can log on to BusinessWeek Online for more on these funds, including interviews with their market-savvy managers.



By Stephen B. Shepard, Editor-in-Chief


Get BusinessWeek directly on your desktop with our RSS feeds.XML

Add BusinessWeek news to your Web site with our headline feed.

Click to buy an e-print or reprint of a BusinessWeek or BusinessWeek Online story or video.

To subscribe online to BusinessWeek magazine, please click here.

Learn more, go to the BusinessWeekOnline home page

Back to Top

MARCH
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. Why Qualcomm Folded to Nokia
  2. America for Sale
  3. Nobody Loves a Three-Year-Old SUV
  4. Microsoft: What Web Strategy?
  5. Sales of Foreclosed Homes Are Up Nationwide

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO
DJIA 11370.69 +21.41
S&P 500 1257.76 +5.22
Nasdaq 2310.53 +30.42

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker



Media Kit | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers
McGraw-Hill Cos.