Click Here to Go Directly to the Story

 
 


U.S. EDITION
Full Table of Contents
Cover Story
Editor's Memo
Up Front
Readers Report
Corrections & Clarifications
Books
Technology & You
Economic Viewpoint
Business Outlook
News: Analysis & Commentary



In Business This Week
Washington Outlook
International Business
International Outlook
Finance
Information Technology
Science & Technology
Developments to Watch
Economics
Marketing
The Corporation
People
Social Issues
BusinessWeek Investor
Dividends
The Barker Portfolio
Inside Wall Street
Figures of the Week
Editorials


INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS
International -- Readers Report
International -- Asian Business
International -- European Business
International -- Finance
International -- Int'l Figures of the Week




MARCH 10, 2003

THE BARKER PORTFOLIO

Next Level: A Grim Fairy Tale

 
By Robert Barker
Robert Barker

  STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story

Related Items
The Barker Portfolio Archive

Once upon a time, let's say 1999, there was a big, warm, and fuzzy bear of an American corporation. It was not only rich, but smart, too. Its very name bespoke quality. Envied though it was, the company reached still higher, striving to set the very benchmark for "a global corporate citizen dedicated to ethical business practices." It was Motorola (MOT ).


While lumbering one day through the technoforest, Motorola came upon a tiny cub of a company. Next Level Communications (NXTV ) was its name. A maker of fancy boxes able to turn a phone company's slim copper wires into broadband pipes carrying not just voices but e-mails and even movies, Next Level looked like a treasure. "The hidden jewel," Motorola called it. So, after seeing Next Level sell stock to public investors at $20 a share, Motorola used its shares to buy an 80% stake in Next Level. It put one of its veterans in charge and secured control of Next Level's board. Swiftly, the stock price sprouted to $202. Motorola looked rich and smart indeed.

Few saw, however, that thunderclouds had gathered over the technoforest. The rain soon fell--and fell. In the deluge, Next Level's key customer, Qwest Communications, nearly drowned. Sales washed away. Red ink bubbled up. Cash ran short again and again, so Next Level kept asking Motorola for more. Motorola gave its little cub enough to stay alive, but barely. When Next Level found other new and willing investors, Motorola turned thumbs down. Each time it gave cash, it took a deeper stake in Next Level.

Suddenly, last summer, Motorola's visage grew grim. Had its jewel turned to glass? Months passed as it mulled its options. Should it keep feeding Next Level until it could find a buyer for its stake, now nearly 90%? Or should it buy off minority shareholders and fold Next Level into Motorola? It queried the company on its prospects for growth. It sought the expert opinions of outsiders. It ciphered the odds first this way and then that. As the winter bore down, Motorola grew quiet and at last made up its mind: It still didn't want others to give Next Level fresh cash. Yet it wanted Next Level to survive. It wanted, finally, Next Level all for itself.

So, one rainy Sunday in January, a messenger from Motorola brought Next Level the news. Motorola would offer to buy minority investors' shares for $1.04 each. To some, this price might seem generous. Only days before, a Next Level share had fetched but 90 cents at market. Yet that was not how other investors, who promptly bid up the shares above $1.20, saw the offer. They instead called it unfair, coercive, a squeeze-out, a freeze-out, a blatant insider trading scheme--in other words, none of the terms usually reserved for corporate citizens dedicated to ethical business practices.

Today, lawyers are swarming and buzzing around Next Level. Motorola pleads it's only striking what is ultimately the best balance for Next Level's entire ecosystem of investors, creditors, customers, employees, and even the broadband-via-copper technology itself. Minority shareholders, plus Next Level's independent directors, complain that on the contrary, Motorola has backed them into a corner: Accept a lowball bid or watch as Motorola lets Next Level collapse.

Now, even the dumbest bunny in the forest might see their point. How can Motorola, without talking to its fellow investors, set a buyout price that's high enough for them yet low enough to suit itself? Negotiating seems the least an enlightened parent might do. After all, who but Motorola can be held accountable for Next Level's suffering? Under Motorola, Next Level lost $385 million.

One of these fine days, Motorola may stumble back toward its goal of good corporate citizenship. In any event, as every fable must, this one ends with a moral: Never--no matter how it tempts you--never, ever buy stock in a company that is majority controlled by another company. For the parent is a bear, and you are but one tick on its cub.



By Robert Barker


Get BusinessWeek directly on your desktop with our RSS feeds.XML

Add BusinessWeek news to your Web site with our headline feed.

Click to buy an e-print or reprint of a BusinessWeek or BusinessWeek Online story or video.

To subscribe online to BusinessWeek magazine, please click here.

Learn more, go to the BusinessWeekOnline home page

Back to Top

MARCH
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. Why Google Is Buying AdMob
  2. Kraft: Is Cadbury the Missing Global Ingredient?
  3. EA-Playfish: Social Gaming Deals Gain Buzz
  4. The Global Innovation Migration
  5. Why This Real Estate Bust Is Different

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO
DJIA 10226.94 0.00
S&P 500 1093.08 0.00
Nasdaq 2154.06 0.00

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker



Media Kit | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers
McGraw-Hill Cos.