Click Here to Go Directly to the Story

 
 


U.S. EDITION
Full Table of Contents
Cover Story
Special Report
Up Front
Readers Report
Corrections & Clarifications
Books
Technology & You
Economic Viewpoint
Economic Trends
Industry Insider

Business Outlook
News: Analysis & Commentary
In Business This Week
Washington Outlook
International Outlook
Information Technology
Science & Technology
Developments to Watch
Media
Marketing

Economics
Social Issues
The Workplace
Finance
The Corporation
Government
BusinessWeek Investor
BusinessWeek Lifestyle
The Barker Portfolio
Inside Wall Street

Figures of the Week
Editorials


INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS
International -- European Cover Story
International -- Readers Report
International -- Asian Business
International -- European Business
International -- Finance
International -- Int'l Figures of the Week




MAY 13, 2002

GOVERNMENT
By Lorraine Woellert


Commentary: Bill Clinton Is Gone...And So Is the Buzz

 
  STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story

Related Items Table: What's Ailing the New Democrats

Political cartoonists and right-wing-conspiracy theorists aren't the only ones who miss Bill Clinton. Moderate New Democrats have been in a swoon since their leader left town. In Clinton's heyday, New Democrat think tanks churned out ideas that moved the party toward the political center through an artful fusion of conservative economics and liberal social policy. But short on leadership and new ideas, New Democrats are struggling for relevance in George W. Bush's Washington.


With liberal leaders pressuring centrists to oppose Bush on trade liberalization and tax cuts, corporate benefactors of the supposedly pro-business movement are questioning New Dems' loyalty. The big blow came on Dec. 6, when a majority of centrist Democrats in the House refused to give Bush the fast-track trade-negotiating authority that Corporate America believes will open new markets.

Most New Dems say they voted against fast track because it didn't include enough protections for U.S. workers and the environment. They blame Republicans for designing a bill that would hurt Democrats--not lead to a consensus. "The Republicans are trying to marginalize us," says Representative Adam Smith (D-Wash.), a self-proclaimed free-trade moderate. "They would much rather run against the liberal Democratic leadership."

Business reaction was fast and furious. A day after the vote, Microsoft Corp. pulled out of a Seattle fund-raiser hosted by Smith. "New Democrats really need to do some serious soul-searching," says Tim Hugo, executive director of the tech lobby CapNet. Apparently they already are. Smith predicts a better showing when the Senate sends down a more worker-friendly version of the trade bill later this spring. "A number of us who didn't support it then are very anxious to support it when it comes back," Smith says.

Moderate Dems remain caught in a political squeeze play, however. House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.), Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), and a reenergized "Fighting Al" Gore are nudging the party to the left. "There's danger that the party will backslide to interest-group politics," says Will Marshall, president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a centrist Democrat think tank.

It's also getting downright crowded in the middle. Intent on building a "New Republican" coalition, Bush is appropriating signature New Dem issues such as education and national service. That makes it easier for moderate GOPers to cut into New Dem funding sources. Claiming to be more reliably pro-business, the fledgling Republican Main Street Partnership is collecting checks from Citigroup (C ), Microsoft (MSFT ), Novell (NOVL ), and others.

In fairness to the New Dems, a certain loss of energy was inevitable after a long run in which many of their ideas, such as work-based welfare reform, became law. And proposals that were novel a decade ago, such as means testing for entitlements, today are widely embraced by members of both parties. To rebuild, New Dems are turning to fresh faces. On Apr. 17, Smith, Jim Davis (Fla.), and Ron Kind (Wis.) took the helm of the New Democrats' House coalition. They'll work with Democratic Leadership Council Chairman Senator Evan Bayh (Ind.) to regroup.

Although high-tech money isn't flowing like it used to, funding is not yet an issue. The New Democrat Network, the group's campaign fund-raising arm, took in $5.4 million for the 2000 elections and hopes to boost that by almost $2 million this cycle.

But business remains skeptical. None of the new leaders has voted with business more than 48% of the time. Yet given the closely divided Congress, corporate lobbyists can't afford to write off anybody. "We're rebuilding some of the bridges that were burned from the trade vote," says Ralph Hellman, a lobbyist for the Information Technology Industry Council.

Even if the New Democrat movement regains Corporate America's trust, it still must find new ideas--and a new leader. Contenders for that role include Senators John Edwards of North Carolina and Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut--both possible Presidential candidates in 2004. Neither seems likely to generate that old Clinton electricity.



Woellert covers Congress.



Get BusinessWeek directly on your desktop with our RSS feeds.XML

Add BusinessWeek news to your Web site with our headline feed.

Click to buy an e-print or reprint of a BusinessWeek or BusinessWeek Online story or video.

To subscribe online to BusinessWeek magazine, please click here.

Learn more, go to the BusinessWeekOnline home page

Back to Top

MAY
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. These Men Could Kill SarbOx
  2. This Year's Holiday Hit Toy: Zhu Zhu Pets
  3. America's Best Place to Raise Your Kids
  4. Picks of the Week: Intel, RIM, Wells Fargo
  5. Abercrombie & Fitch Bargains for a Rebound

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO
DJIA 10318.16 -14.28
S&P 500 1091.38 -3.52
Nasdaq 2146.04 -10.78

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker



Media Kit | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers
McGraw-Hill Cos.