Click Here to Go Directly to the Story




U.S. EDITION
Full Table of Contents
Cover Story
Special Report
Up Front
Readers Report
Corrections & Clarifications
Books
Technology & You
Economic Viewpoint
Economic Trends
Business Outlook

News: Analysis & Commentary
In Business This Week
Washington Outlook
International Business
Information Technology
The Corporation
Science & Technology
Developments to Watch
Finance
Industrial Management

Economics
Sports Business
BusinessWeek Investor
The Barker Portfolio
Inside Wall Street
Figures of the Week
Editorials


INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS
International -- Int'l Cover Story
International -- Readers Report
International -- Corrections & Clarifications
International -- Asian Business
International -- European Business
International -- Int'l Outlook
International -- Finance
International -- Int'l Figures of the Week
International -- Editorials




APRIL 15, 2002

Readers Report


  STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story

On This Page
Putting Accountability Back into Accounting

A Sweeter Assessment of Perfumania

Let's Be Fair to the Clinton Presidency

GM's Health Benefits Are Far from Perfect


Putting Accountability Back into Accounting

"The reluctant reformer" (Cover Story, Mar. 25) focused on two ways for the Securities & Exchange Commission to punish corporate executives involved in financial-statement fraud: force them to return their ill-gotten gains and bar them from serving as officers or directors.

If we truly want to get executives' attention and prevent abuses, the SEC must work more closely with federal prosecutors. Our research on approximately 200 cases of financial-statement fraud between 1987 and 1997 indicated that criminal charges were filed only 15% of the time, and we found evidence of only 27 individuals serving jail time. Even if SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt's "CEO misbehavior" plan is implemented, the penalties for committing fraud still pale in comparison to the enormous damage inflicted on the investors, employees, and other stakeholders.

Dana R. Hermanson
Director of Research
Corporate Governance Center
Kennesaw State University
Kennesaw, Ga.

Your recent editorial (Don't kill Andersen. Reform it," Mar. 25) was pathetic. How many second chances does it take before you are willing to admit that an organization that once stood for integrity and honesty is now rotten to the core? Are you prepared to hire Arthur Andersen as your auditors? I didn't think so.

Earl R. Washburn
Placerville, Calif.

What Arthur Andersen is alleged to have done is far more serious and damaging than the transgressions of Enron.

David Spirakis
New York


Back to Top

A Sweeter Assessment of Perfumania

I would like to respond to your assertion that Perfumania is a weak tenant ("The wrong time for REITs?" Finance, Mar. 11). During these difficult times, Perfumania has outperformed many other retailers while continuing to improve its stores' image, customer service, fragrance assortment, and shoppers' recognition. Perfumania finished February with sales about 14.5% above a year earlier, and we are implementing numerous improvements in order for this positive trend to continue. The company has approximately 250 stores and will be opening more in 2002 and 2003.

Jeffrey Geller
President and CEO
Perfumania
Miami


Back to Top

Let's Be Fair to the Clinton Presidency

As a longtime subscriber, I am not interested in right-wing polemics masquerading as book reviews ("A squandered Presidency?" Books, Mar. 25). Richard Dunham's review of Joe Klein's The Natural was far less informative about the book or the Clinton Presidency than it was about Dunham's (and your?) agenda to trash Clinton.

How can any responsible reviewer in a business publication possibly render a summary of this Presidency without mentioning that it included the longest sustained economic expansion in modern American history? That Clinton stood against every Republican in Congress to raise taxes in 1993, in the process reversing 12 years of Republican deficits? That the Dow Jones industrial average more than tripled during the eight years of this Presidency? Or that Clinton defied his own party to produce a significant reform of welfare?

Robert Freeman
Palo Alto, Calif.


Back to Top

GM's Health Benefits Are Far from Perfect

"Finally, skid control at GM" (The Corporation, Mar. 25), said General Motors Corp.'s money woes were caused in part by worker benefits, asserting that "GM's union workers have no co-pay for health care." As an active employee with traditional health care, I still pay 100% for doctor's office visits and required school physical exams and a co-pay for prescriptions and a portion of dental benefits, as well. These costs add up to a lot more than $0.

Gregory Burg
Wilmington, Del.




Back to Top


TODAY'S MOST POPULAR STORIES

  1. Why IKEA Is Fed Up with Russia
  2. AT&T's Designs for the Wireless Market
  3. Obama's Russian Business Plan
  4. Microsoft Defends Its Empire
  5. Pirate Bay's Weird New Business Plan

Get Free RSS Feed >>
  MARKET INFO
DJIA 8248.92 -31.82
S&P 500 892.59 -3.83
Nasdaq 1790.03 -6.49

Portfolio Service Update

Stock Lookup

Enter name or ticker



Media Kit | Special Sections | MarketPlace | Knowledge Centers
McGraw-Hill Cos.