Posted by: Justin Bachman on June 22
The online hotel reviews business – and this is not a small market, lest you were wondering – gained a new entrant Monday with the launch of Oyster Hotel Reviews. Oyster aims to post objective reviews on some 20,000 hotels in the top 200 cities that attract leisure travelers.
The interesting part about Oyster, however, is how the company obtains its reviews: It’s hiring real reporters to “cover” hotels. Rival sites, Expedia (EXPE)-owned TripAdvisor.com and Sabre’s IgoUgo.com aggregate user-generated opinions on hotels and face periodic allegations that their systems are gamed. Oyster maintains that its reportage sets it apart. It accepts no freebies, “media rates” or payments to do reviews. It aims to be an objective editorial site, not one that sells hotel rooms or markets brands. It hires experienced writers who have worked for publications such as NPR, ESPN, Time Out New York, Radar, the Village Voice, the BBC, and Huffington Post.
“Our reporters also have the experience to actually weigh the both the upside and downside of a stay at every hotel,” the company tells users on its Web site. “We focus on conducting honest reporting and thoroughly investigating each hotel we visit.” All the photos are from the staff, too. There are links to online travel agents like Orbitz (OWW) and priceline (PCLN) to check prices and to book, which is one of the revenue streams.
The company contends that since the hotel bill is often the most expensive part of a leisure trip, travelers are far more cautious about choosing. Hotels also tend to be less of a commodified product compared to other travel businesses, and your personal background/expectations come into play far more when evaluating a hotel experience than it does when you plop down in an airplane seat or compact car. All of which means people spend more time on the research and want to know more about the experience of those who have stayed at a particular hotel. “Hotels are a product you can’t return once you’ve bought it,” says co-founder and CEO Elie Seidman, who helped start a telecom services firm, Epana Networks, in 2000. “We believe the critical thing here is to reduce their risk.”
From the perspective of turning a profit, Oyster’s business model is enough to induce apoplexy: Send a full-time reporter on a two-week trip to sample seven or eight hotels and foot the bill -- which can reach $35,000 -- in exchange for unbiased coverage of the properties. "We’re going to spend about $40 million on this before we break even,” says Seidman. He and a partner have invested some of their own funds, along with Accelerator Ventures, and recently got $6.5 million from Bain Capital Ventures. Additional fundraising is expected later this year or next.
Desperate hotels are shoveling money into marketing and advertising. The sites also sell advertising and can boast impressive claims for how long users spend clicking around reviews and hotel photos. The Expedia unit that holds Trip Advisor is now producing 11% of the entire company’s $636 million revenue. “If you can get users, it hasn’t been that difficult to monetize,” Seidman says.
Likely true. However, Oyster is incurring high costs, which it readily admits, and considers these the price of admission to a decent product. “We have the luxury of having the financial resources to do it right,” Seidman says. Yet part of the cost comes from hiring a unique breed. I know plenty of experienced, middle-aged reporters and they share certain traits: They typically like to travel, tend to be frugal with their own meager funds, if not their employers’, and toil in a career that has paid them a pittance compared to most of their college friends. (Disclosure: You can toss me into this cohort.) Many wield occupational horror stories preceding a swift job loss or employer switch. They will throw themselves into their work, particularly if it involves inspecting the swimming pools at a Four Seasons. They eat and drink with aplomb. They will order cocktails on the flight and tell the boss it was a crucial business expense. (A reasonable contention, to my mind.) In other words, send one of these people to Miami for two weeks to report on the beds, bathroom amenities and cuisine and you’ve found a perfect way to hemorrhage cash.
So yes, there’s plenty of reason for skepticism about this business venture – or even unvarnished snark. Oyster is completely counterintuitive, given the general prospects for media ventures, yet also sits poised to capitalize on the expanded marketing hotels are forced into when recessions hit. It's an interesting experiment.
This model of paying reviewers appears to work for the Spanish hotel review site Notodohoteles.com, which relies on a former hotel critic for the Spanish daily "El Pais" named Fernando Gallardo to review hotels mostly in Spain and Portugal. Readers get his take on the pros and cons of hundreds of places. Reader opinions are posted as well but it's clear which are which.
The issue is that quite clearly many of the 'reader comments' are paid bloggers, either to boost the people paying them or tear down the competition of the people paying them. In many cases its pretty obvious, but in other cases not. I booked a trip on Expedia recently and they refused to post my review; I'd been upset by a charge made to my credit card after I'd checked out, a common practice, and they refused to put this in. So I refused to change the review, but the end result was, it never got posted and so people don't know; it may have been an isolated incident or it may have been a pattern of behavior, but no-one will ever know due to 'censorship' by Expedia.
Oyster's plans are certainly ambitious. But it is worth noting that other great hotel review sites exist which do not follow the dubious review methods used by the larger aggregator sites. For example, TabletHotels.com has come up with a great system of balancing one-time independent expert reviews with travelers' subsequent hotel experiences.
No hotel can become a Tablet Hotel before undergoing a rigorous review process by one of the company's travel experts (followed-up with another review by Tablet Hotel's selection committee), and hotels are not allowed to buy their way in (ie, by offering free rooms or paying fees to be listed on the site).
Meanwhile, the Tablet Hotels Meter averages real-time customer ratings, which can only be submitted by Tablet Hotel customers who have actually stayed in the hotels, preventing outside tampering. If a hotel falls below a certain rating, it is automatically removed from the site, no matter what. And despite the effort involved, prices are competitive or even lower than on other sites. Definitely worth checking out.
Great idea...but being dumped into the supermarket checkout-like atmosphere of the big-booking companies after the civilized and high quality atmosphere of Oyster is a let-down of a large order.
For Greece, SuperbGreece.com offers descriptions and reviews of hotels, newly written, and same with photos - but also offers free expert advise to help guests make the best of choices - seems like an Oyster-deluxe for Greece!
What makes this any different then the old fashion travel writer review? Magazines and travel writers with integrity, were unannounced and never accepted free rooms so they could write honestly about a property....so what is the difference? This is a step backward because it is still one person's opinion and not a group of experiences.
This is another shot at making it big in the Hotel Review market. However, if they are really doing what they are saying then it's great for the traveler. I do firmly believe that hotel reviews should be left to travelers, instead of just one person reviews. Censorship always existed in this business. We can do with moderate censorship. Guest experiences - even if negative - should not be censored.
Isn't this something of a backward step? I thought the whole growth of social networking is down to the fact that people like to hear from other people like themselves, not professionals.
I'll still look at Tripadvisor, Skoosh or any customer review sites for hotels rather than Oyster.
This is not a smart approach. Having a one person perspective is quite useless. They will stay in one room type, at one time of the year (say Winter), perhaps the week the pool closes. They will run out of $ very quickly. Nobody's going to give them the millions they are looking for.
This could be a great way to "gather" as many informations as possible to find out about more about the hotel. So I could combine 'common' people's opinion (former guests) and professional.
BusinessWeek editors Dean Foust and Justin Bachman provide road warriors with the latest news, trends in business travel, which as most readers are aware, has all the romance of taking a school bus cross country. Come here to pick up travel news and tips or just commiserate about your latest business trip gone awry.