BusinessWeek Logo

The Pilots' War At United

Posted by: Justin Bachman on August 11

The war between United Airlines (UAUA) and its pilots took a new turn today with the pilots renewing their call for the resignation of CEO Glenn Tilton. It’s not the first time the United branch of the Air Line Pilots Association has urged Tilton quit, but it is the first time since the airline sued ALPA and four pilots last month, alleging that a concerted action by pilots to call in sick was forcing flight cancellations. The company is seeking an injunction.

The United ALPA branch, led by Capt. Steve Wallach, a 747 pilot, has grown increasingly vocal and active in its campaign to a) force United to open contract negotiations early and b) highlight the severe operational woes plaguing an airline that once had many fans. Wallach’s ALPA bio describes his style as “smart, thorough and militant.” On Saturday, the Wall Street Journal reported on a recent letter from Wallach to the Federal Aviation Administration, warning that four recent Boeing 737 power plant failures could have been the result of weak maintenance at the company. While it’s unlikely the FAA would conclude that United’s maintenance practices are lax – the agency is charged by Congress to closely monitor said work, after all – the range of ALPA’s recent assault is quite broad. The company, naturally, was outraged by the suggestion and tactic.

The union is also enlisting passengers in its cause, through a site called Glenn Tilton Must Go. The site lists what the union calls the numerous failures besetting the company from the large (management working in their own self-interest) to the small (understaffing at United’s Orange County station). The site is collecting horror stories and has a link for people to write Tilton.

In an e-mail, United spokeswoman Jean Medina called the effort “an obvious and predictable attempt to deflect attention from ALPA’s illegal activity cited in our lawsuit, which details the organized and concerted effort to harm our customers, our employees and our performance; and is part of the union’s ongoing two-year campaign to intimidate United into reopening a contract that runs through December 2009.”

Now, of course, one could chalk much if not all of this rancor up to the dire financial straits the industry finds itself in and the resulting pain airline workers have endured in recent years. (United pilots, in fact, post on their Web site down to the day how long they have been working under their current “draconian” contract.) However, there are other observers, including BusinessWeek columnist Bob Reed, who have argued the same about Tilton (without organized labor’s specific interests in mind). To many people, it appears that United is not managed as an airline, but merely as a large company being prepped for the auction block. So, Continental alliance or no Continental alliance, maybe it would be better for all involved in this messy enterprise if UAL were to find a buyer. Like, asap. Anyone? Anyone?

Reader Comments

JP

August 11, 2008 08:49 PM

United, and for that matter all U.S. airlines, have severe service issues. My last flight back to Japan from SF I booked what was scheduled to be an ANA flight, plane and crew, it was changed last minute to United, myself and several others in business class tried to change flights because the service and food are that bad. I felt, throughout the entire flight, as if I was inconveniencing the flight attendants. When I wanted a glass of water, I had to get up to request it and was given an attitude. U.S. airlines, needs to take a lesson or two from their international counterparts, particularly ANA, JAL, Emirates, & Singapore Airlines - they know how to provide service and great food. Most importantly though they smile, what a novel idea for a flight attendant.

faahope

August 12, 2008 05:52 AM

With all the problems in the FAA I am unsure if they have the time to do anything smart like check the airlines for problems. They have so many of their own problems.
With irritating people like me haunting them about contingency plans to keep the U.S. safe. Check out faahope.com It is amazing to me that what they have on paper as contingency plans has never been practiced. I know: I am married to an air traffic controller.

exhausted UA customer

August 12, 2008 08:26 AM

I am a 1K (top-tier) customer. I agree with their message 100%. However, in disparaging Tilton by using his name for their website, the pilots no longer appear professional and credible, but merely appear spiteful and petty. This can only help the position of those on Tilton's team.

Very, very, very disappointing.

Julie Ann Brown

August 12, 2008 12:15 PM

Seriously, which “corporation" or "command economy" does the poster above (the one who questions the pilots professionalism) align themselves with?

My students would be asked to question the above post and poster. Why question it? The reason would be to increase their critical and creative thinking skills (necessary for future successful business entrepreneurs/investors/executives). Economic and personal freedom requires the analysis of powerful written words in cyberspace. In this post, there are succinct silencing punch phrases. Even though a short post, it was consciously and powerfully written. Therefore, it is a good example to note, analyze, question. Let us go deeper …

Accusing a group of individuals who hold our lives (and our loved ones) in their hands as appearing “unprofessional” in the performance of their work is not logical (especially if you are a “seasoned flyer). Why would the writer wish to create feelings of insecurity? An entire industry as well as the individual flying customer is based (however intuitively) on being safe in the sky and on the ground. When men and women go into their cockpits as professional aviators, they use all their hours of training to make us feel “intuitive safe.” Customers take for granted our pilots are going to do their job. They believe the managers who hire and work for the airlines have made good “professional” decisions for those who fly the planes (such as making their pilots feel safe in their own lives through decent wages and work rules) for their customers.

Why Is this poster trying to both discount what these individuals do for others in their life’s work? (Sorry, but I want a seasoned pilot who by law must be professionally trained to fly my family safely rather than anyone off the street who thinks the plane can be flown by anyone...NOT...)? Why try to scar them by discounting or eliminating their ability to express their freedom of speech? Authoritarian leaders do this (pedophile parents and ruthless dictators) by silencing "voices" that could stop their behavior. When a Tilton said that "morale is not his problem" and he would take away any benefits/salaries from his employees until their "were no scraps left on the table" he had every right to do as he too, was exercising his "freedom of speech."

Is the poster really a "paying 1-K traveler or perhaps indeed travels "stand-by?" Why would he try to take away the credibility of a group who safely takes him/her to his destination of loved ones? Hmmm...Just the tenured professor of business in me my questioning the motivation of a "silencer..." They are the greatest threats to marketplace innovation and change and profitablity...Change however painful...is the first theory taught in Business 101...It is called the "Risk/Return" trade-off...

Julie Ann Brown MBA/MPPA

Exhausted UA customer

August 12, 2008 06:29 PM

The professor above might wish to re-read my statement, which is quite succinct and specifies support for the pilots' position. I am hardly "accusing the pilots of appearing unprofessional in the performance of their work."

Pilots, precisely because of the nature of the job, must display to the public a collective appearance of trustworthiness and dignity. Without these, the public will not fly. The issue is the use of the name of an executive for their protest website (instead of, for example, boot-out-ua-management.com). Doing so comes across as infantile rage, and thus undermines their image as professionals.

The professor might wish to read all the words, not just the ones convenient to her self-promoting agenda.

Julie Ann Brown

August 12, 2008 11:00 PM

Leadership when it fails, mirror the falling of dominoes...Dominoes that fall so fast that sadly, they have worn out any breaks that can no longer slow or stop their descent...
However, when leadership does its job well, it creates brand loyalty. This type of brand loyalty will exist both within their current and future customers and stockholders.
United Airlines “Upper Management “needs to study the management decision making at Google. The individuals at the helm of Google can teach them how to successfully manage a company. Google can also help them to learn how to create customer satisfaction for customers, employees and owners.

Google has created a feast for its customers and stockholders (vs. Tilton's "no scraps left on the table). For example, I myself was more excited at the thought I was a stockholder on the first day Google sold stock to her customers than what my future potential profitability would be... I wanted to be a part of the energy of a company that I knew would exist long after, alas, my own earthly sojourn would be done…

As I was in a state of “business bliss” through my Google stock purchase, I told others…I found that many of my colleagues and students said that even though they did not own stock in Google, they hoped that the company would succeed…Once again, it was evident that Google created brand loyalty not just in its current advocates…but those who would be in her future!

Even though I have long ago sold my Google stock (profitably I may add) I still have warm fuzzes for Google and those who "pilot" her course...

For those who hold specific United Airlines leadership positions, I hope that they have not been forever "defiled" by the leaders who have easily sold their own souls for a few pieces of silver…Hopefully, the good , the just and the true souls in power at U.A.L. will get out in time or turn “injustice” into “justice.”

As Sister Margaret Mary taught me many years ago in Business 101, “… remember that when we all are to leave from this earthy sojourn, it is the way we make those around us "feel,” that will long be remembered... “ Ultimately, whether we are stranger, family, friend, colleague, or foe, it is our legacy that will be what others remember and discuss about us...Our reputation and our story are indeed elements of our reflected immortality in those most like us…our mentors, our friends, and our family members.
Oh, poster… my agenda is to model the phrase…”If we do not stand for something...we will FALL for anything...”

Bill Swilley

August 13, 2008 09:23 AM

I am a million mile flyer with UA and was a consistent 1K flyer for many years. However, I have to agree with the author of this article; the only way to fix UA is dismantle it and sell the pieces to someone who actually knows how to run an airline.

I am no longer a 1K flyer with UA today and probably will never be a 1K flyer with them again. Their on-time performance and abysmal service will ensure that I book my flights with almost any other airline if I have a choice.

inUA

August 13, 2008 11:44 PM

Hey everyone-I work at U.A. and you are all wrong. But only because you don't work there. Not your fault. It would take a long,long time for me to tell you everything, but the first part of the problem is the consumers wanting alot of frequency at low prices and the aviation system is overburdened. Also,the schedule is set up the same nearly every day of the year and does not take into account any irregularities such as weather across the system,or general safety issues. Thousands of take offs and landings scheduled every day set up in a perfect world. But it's not a perfect world,so bad stuff happens every day. As an employee, many co-workers and I often say that all airlines should stop. Just give up trying to satisfy the consumer, and this insane competition between each other and cease altogether. We say,make everyone (us included) take a different mode of transportation. It's not worth all the insanity that happens internally or externally. Of course that won't happen but most believe and feel it's the worst industry. I have an idea to all of you complainers-stop coming to the airport. Shut up, go away, take the train, drive, walk or just stay home. We hate you ingrates with a passion. And the next time you have a complaint, don't walk right by the Captain and be a coward! Tell them how you feel-after all,they are CAPTAIN and have made a lot of money. So,try complaining to them. Stop letting them of the hook. Oh, or better yet, don't let yourself get all worked up, just don't fly anymore. Problem solved. You'll no longer be considered an ingrate. And that's exactly what you are.

Zack Rules

August 14, 2008 12:02 AM

I still don't understand how United is still struggling. They have fantastic hubs, O'Hare, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington Dulles for international flights and yet they only run a handful of international flights out of them. Delta's done a great job at taking their 767's and 757's to higher revenue international flying. Why can't UA do the same?

Dave

August 14, 2008 03:02 PM

The pilots are right on in their critique of UAL's management failures.

Another great site for United investors, analysts and the like is
UitedAirlinesInvestorAlert.com

Post a comment

 

About

BusinessWeek editors Dean Foust and Justin Bachman provide road warriors with the latest news, trends in business travel, which as most readers are aware, has all the romance of taking a school bus cross country. Come here to pick up travel news and tips or just commiserate about your latest business trip gone awry.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links


Magazine

Current Issue

BusinessWeek Cover