BusinessWeek Logo

Internet calls on planes: The genie is out...

Posted by: Dean Foust on August 27

portable-cell-phone-booth.jpgWhen American Airlines, in partnership with Aircell, launched its in-flight Internet service recently, it created one big restriction: Passengers couldn’t use Skype or one of the other VOIP (Internet-based) phone services. Earlier this week I blogged about how an ingenious flier had within a mere day or two of the launch, had figured out a “end run”—using Phweet, an Internet app that makes conversations and conference calls possible between Twitter friends. I know I sounded like I was off my meds that day, but I’m not exactly enthralled about the prospect of listening to other passengers prattle on to friends about whether the stylist cut their hair too short and such. In the least, the airlines should force passengers making Internet calls to wear the headgear shown here, right(photo)?

So what’s Aircell and American gonna do about Phweet? And are there other Phweet-like services out there, that will turn the airlines efforts to shut down in-flight phone calls into a mile-high game of Whac-A-Mole? And if so, what are they? (Keep reading, because I can tell you.)

I talked to a spokeswoman for Aircell last night and she said Aircell fully expected that fertile minds would find workarounds, “but I don’t think we expected someone to find a way around it in a day.” She said Aircell engineers are already …

... working hard on a fix to prevent passengers from making calls via Phweet, but without impacting the ability of other passengers to use Flash-based applications. She wouldn't provide any details of how they're trying to block Phweet for fear of giving a roadmap to the creative brains looking for end runs.

She also noted that anyone using Phweet or any similar programs in the future are violating the "terms of service," which are spelled out in one of those little boxes you always have to “agree” to, with a mouse click, to use various services. She wouldn't say what the penalty for violating the service agreement would be, but I imagine a flight attendant could threaten to cut off a violator's Internet access.

One last point: The spokeswoman said that in customer surveys conducted before the service was launched, the majority of fliers said they didn't want to be bothered by other passengers making a VOIP phone call. (That may be true, but you also have to believe the airlines are protecting their own in-flight phone services. They never tried to stop passengers from making those calls, did they?)

So can Aircell prevent passengers from making their own calls? I’m no technologist (I used to be, but then cassettes replaced eight-track tapes) but I’ve spent a fair bit of time in the past 24 hours reading every shard of information I could find, and this is an easy call--they can't stop it, except for flight attendants spotting passengers talking through a headset and busting them. And short of that, there's no other roadblock. One poster to my earlier blog suggested travelers pack "jamming" devices, but I suspect that would create even bigger problems since they'd likely interfere with the cockpit transmissions (right?). I’ll tell you what I know but I’d like for the true geeks to jump in and educate us all.

For starters, most folks think it’ll be hard for Aircell to stamp out Phweet because it’s a flash-based application and to do so would also mean preventing passengers from using any and all other Flash-based apps on the Net. What’s more, there are other services and apps like Ventrilo, TeamSpeak and (maybe) TringMe and Hamachi that do the trick as well, as well as anonymous surfing sites like Ultimate-Anonymity that could possibly enable someone to evade the airline’s proxy (though I suspect that Aircell will block customers from using these anonymous proxy sites, just as our parent McGraw-Hill does here at work.)

A poster in another forum on this issue suggested that if the practice of VOIP calls really became a problem for the airlines, they could “purposely put intermittent interruptions…to disrupt any real time data flow, such as VOIP-like connections.” Of course, that could also aggravate passengers who log into their company’s VPN to check their email, if it causes the VPN connection to break.

In another forum, a poster asks:

“Can't this also be done using an SSH tunnel? SSH tunnels have given me a loooooot of freedom at work. Unless VPN is blocked, you can VPN to your home network, VNC to your desktop, and talk away on any service you like.”

(I don’t know enough about this technology? Can anyone help here?)

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/

Reader Comments

Z1atan

August 27, 2008 05:46 PM

Agreed, you cannot block everything. No matter what they choose to do, a knowledgeable user will find a way around the implementation. The only way to efficiently restrict users from accessing unwanted services is by stopping service. The same way optimally stopping virus threats is disabling your internet connection.

Sledgehammer

August 27, 2008 05:55 PM

I suggest the flight attendants have the option of requesting an air marshall just shoot the VOIP violators! It's not like the marshalls have been overly busy busting terrorists in the last 5 years. Problem solved.

But seriously, the terms of service violation might be addressed on the airline ticket. Violators can be banned from future flights on the airline. The airlines have reduced available seats as well as the number of flights, so the available seats, along with the hassles involved would tend to encourage fliers to follow the rules. Make it punitively risky to make the call and most people will comply. The rest can take a bus or stay home.

So Long, Sucker

August 27, 2008 07:46 PM

Good call Sledgehammer! Even better, just boot them from the flight (while in the air). Wonder if that floating seat cushion will slow the fall?

CarefulWhatYouWishFor

August 27, 2008 08:29 PM

Having someone in the next seat talking on the phone would be very annoying. The airlines need to be careful with their business travelers though. Hassle people about phone calls on flights too much and they may decide to keep the calls and skip the flights. Video chat, Lotus Sametime, and video conferencing mean more time working, less time sitting in airports or on planes and being home every night.

sean

August 27, 2008 10:41 PM

but airlines, I think at this point, need customers. or am I wrong?

AAh8r

August 27, 2008 11:33 PM

Sure you can stop it! Add an intentional 200-300ms of latency, and the quality of VOIP will be terrible at best. QoS will do this for specific types of network traffic so as to not effect everything. If you try to defeat QoS with VPN, I bet your latency will rise above the level of usability. Think about it, you are establishing an encrypted tunnel to your house, and then you have to add on the normal latency associated with the call. If Aircell provides a low latency enough connection to do that, then they can stand to intentionally add some without anyone else noticing.

Jim A

August 28, 2008 08:12 AM

As mentioned above, ff the network does periodic breaks in the link, the data piece will resend and the voice connection would eventually be untenable.
I love the guy who just shoot the person

ricochet

August 28, 2008 08:48 AM

I would imagine that there could be a way to shut off service if you knew who was connected and using voip, but that would be hard to do, especially by the flight attendants.

A better way I think is to have a surcharge of perhaps $50 if the person is found to be using voice. It won't stop it, but at least there's a disincentive. Systems such as Row 44, Voyant, or SkyThing.com may have the ability to do that.

huck2isu2

August 28, 2008 09:31 AM

I think they should not attempt to make VOIP calls not allowed, just say if you want to make calls they they should have to sit in a more expensive section of the plane with all of the other people who are making calls, that way they don't disturb the family travelers.

On the point of banning those users from future flights is a bad idea, airlines can't afford to ban anyone, especially the high paying business men, the ones who are most likely going to be the ones needing to make the calls in the first place.

I do on a side note, think the phone booth head cover (photo above) is a good idea, and should be implemented all over the world, especially in restaurants.

Silent Flyer

September 2, 2008 12:09 PM

There used to be smoking sections on planes (Man, I'm old if I remember that). We could replace them with Cell Phone sections. Seal them off and suck the air out of them...

Dizzle

May 12, 2009 12:46 PM

How is making a VOIP call any different for someone on a plane than talking to the passenger next to you? Both are at approx. the same volume, and usually the conversation with other passengers last longer. So what's the big deal? I say let them call home.

Besides that, if you're on an international flight, wouldn't you WANT your passengers to be able to call home? Seems like a no brainer to me...

Post a comment

 

About

BusinessWeek editors Dean Foust and Justin Bachman provide road warriors with the latest news, trends in business travel, which as most readers are aware, has all the romance of taking a school bus cross country. Come here to pick up travel news and tips or just commiserate about your latest business trip gone awry.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links


Magazine

Current Issue

BusinessWeek Cover