BusinessWeek Logo

When the Luxury Party Stopped

Posted by: Charles DuBow on September 29

Despite the biggest one day drop in the Dow since 1987, tonight in Manhattan restaurants will still be full, Town Cars will still be waiting by the curb and Champagne bottles will still be uncorked. But maybe there will be fewer orders of truffles and more of chicken, some people might take a cab instead, and the Champagne may be by the glass instead of the bottle.

During the recent economic boom New Yorkers of many different backgrounds and incomes have become so used to luxuries of all kinds that they tend to regard them as a matter of course. In much of the rest of the country, however, people rarely dine out, a limo is strictly for weddings and prom night, and Champagne is often eschewed in favor of beer. Yet in Manhattan and its siser cities—San Francisco, Washington, Shanghai, Chicago, London, Moscow, et al—the lingua franca is American Express.

And on this night when the market fell nearly 780 points and is flirting with slipping below 10,000, amidst the whirl of cocktail parties and dinners at Nobu many New Yorkers should not be blamed for hearing a little voice in the back of their head whispering: “This is about to all change.”

Tomorrow stores like Hermes, Tiffany and Louis Vuitton will open their doors and customers will still come in. These customers may not buy as extravagantly as they once did and some may not return at all. For some people, there is never a time not to think about luxury, because for them the line between luxury and necessity has blurred completely. For others, it may just seem in bad taste to spend at a time when so many are pulling in their horns. And, of course, there will be those who simply can no longer afford it, any of it.

The luxury business will continue. Expensive shoes, handbags, wristwatches and wines will still be made and consumed. But not in the same way, not after today for a while. Companies such as Richemont and LVMH will be forced to adjust their profit targets and sales people around the world will lose their jobs as stores close.

In years to come people will look back upon this period as a golden age of sorts, when so many felt so rich for so many of the wrong reasons. In a way, it’s not all bad—except of course for those who will lose their jobs—because it had to stop somewhere. Parties can’t last forever, wine bottles empty. For the luxury business, it will be a time to retool, to rethink what they do. Some companies will disappear—but then again some always will. Like a forest after a fire sweeps through it, things may look pretty black for a while but before too long new buds will emerge and old oaks will flower again. When that happens, we won’t take luxury for granted anymore. At least not at first.

Reader Comments

Rajpal

September 30, 2008 08:39 AM

A lot of artificial wealth was created in all parts of the world creating more artificial jobs! All has to come to end someday! Maybe it is today ....

LAO

September 30, 2008 09:47 AM

With average retail pay at $10/hr (that would be $20,000/yr), and about half of employees reportedly relying on a spouse's health insurance, one can't help but wonder whether some of these jobs simply fund unnecessary consumption.

However, each of those jobs also generates nearly $20,000/yr in state and local sales taxes, even more in high end retail. This could turn into a loss that all of us will feel.

sam

September 30, 2008 10:02 AM

Class Warfare is now on the menu.

Sarah @ Salescoop

May 28, 2009 12:09 AM

Even with the recession, I often wondered how it was that the life in Manhattan still seemed the same. I completely agree that "the line between luxury and necessity has blurred completely". When that change that is inevitable in the luxury industry takes place, I would believe that the field of internet and the new social medias will be a great part of it. In a sense, I think this step was a necessary one, so that the industry could evolve into something bigger.

Steven W.

June 22, 2009 03:48 PM

I feel that the luxury market is still very strong. I know the numbers are down due to the recession, but I feel the main reason we don't hear as much is the "rich and famous" are not bragging like in past years. Maybe they're not trying to step on the low "self-esteme" of the "common folk".

Joy B

July 24, 2009 03:59 PM

Yes, even the most gilded of luxury companies are feeling gutted by this recession.

Agree that retooling and refocusing is mandatory. Luxury brands extended too far afield.

At Fahrenheit 212, we think luxury companies need to re-ink the boundaries between Absolute and Prestige brands and innovate within them. Narrow and deep is the new black.

Read more on this in "Luxury's 2010 Innovation Collection" here: http://tinyurl.com/lzmg66

Post a comment

 

About

The global market for luxury goods and services is estimated in the billions of dollars. Where should readers spend their money? Which products offer the best value? Which luxury companies are making the most profit? BusinessWeek’s Director of New Products and editor of its Lifestyle channel Charles Dubow takes you behind the gilded curtain.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links