Burberry's Better Half

Posted by: Charles DuBow on May 28

burberry-metal-studs-warrior-bag.jpg

The Warrior bag is carrying Burberry, instead of the other way around.

Ho ho, what’s this? Burberry Group PLC (BRBY) reported its earnings today and, lo and behold, it had a 15% gain in second-half profit. That should come as a pleasant surprise to its beleagured shareholders who saw the company’s share price sink 16% in January after it announced that it would miss it profit forecast.

The reason for Burberry’s surge was the success of its pricey Warrior bag and the opening of new stores.

The London-based company reported that net income rose to 69.1 million pounds ($136.8 million) in the six months through March from 60.3 million pounds a year earlier. Sales climbed 19% to 546.3 million pounds.

But I am still not entirely sold on the brand. CEO Angela Ahrendts said that they plan to expand more in the U.S. but, despite some good promotion from getting Sara Jessica Parker to wear the label in her new “Sex and the City” movie, I don’t think the brand is as defined as it used to be. That’s not to say it doesn’t make good clothes but I just don’t know what its brand message is. That’s important for a label like Burberry, which has so clearly distanced itself from its previous incarnations. Most of its serious competitors are pretty clearly defined. Chanel is sophisticated, Gucci is sexy, Ralph Lauren is classic, etc, etc.

Using SJP is a smart move and will probably gain it some traction in the short term but longer term it needs to capitalize on their message to consumers. Sure, they could make a big push in Asia but no Western fashion house ever did well in developing markets without first winning over its base at home, which explains their U.S. expansion plans. But given the struggling U.S. economy and the decline in luxury retailing spending, if Burberry wants to succeed here they need to get their message straight.

What do readers think? Am I way off base? Let me know.

Reader Comments

Caricouture

May 31, 2008 12:45 AM

I think Burberry does have a distinctive voice. It has achieved a very clever brand repositioning - it now represents "Englishness", a bit classic, a bit eccentric and a bit London cool, but English all the same. Considering it's an English brand, it all ties in quite nicely. It's about being individual. There are very few brands that manage to create a distinctive image out of a hotch potch of influences like this.

The brand has certainly become red hot in recent years and considering the fashion press's ongoing love affair with creative director Christopher Bailey, that's not going to change any time soon.

Ale

June 3, 2008 11:47 AM

I think Burberry has a very well defined image of the brand, especially with those who are between 30-40 y.o.
I do not think either that Gucci has a sexy image. Dior does.
Talking about Dior, I have been rumored about a new website from lvmh, which is not confirmed... do you know ? http://www.eluxior.com/
I do not think it belongs to the group though.

Thank you for your interest. This blog is no longer active.

 

About

The global market for luxury goods and services is estimated in the billions of dollars. Where should readers spend their money? Which products offer the best value? Which luxury companies are making the most profit? BusinessWeek’s Director of New Products and editor of its Lifestyle channel Charles Dubow takes you behind the gilded curtain.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!